Help me understand Republican women in their 30s and 40s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Cite the specific language! Cite the specific language!"

LOL. Men dressed as women are chasing their "sorority sisters" around with their erections and men dressed as women are raping people in women's prisons. Liberal judges are approving of this and making it happen based on their interpretation of the law. Who cares about citing language when this is already the defacto law of the land under the current regime.

Indeed. Who cares about citing language. You’ll just stick with your alternative facts, amirite?

The PP essentially claimed that Joe Biden's EO language gives men the absolute right to prance around buck naked in front of women in their changing rooms with erect penises. I asked for the specific language that did this. The PP couldn't provide any such language from Joe Biden's EOs to back it up. Just some order that resulted from some right wing anti-trans extremists shopping a lawsuit in a court run by a Trump-appointed judge that, like the PP, also "interpreted" (meaning, pretended) the language was there when it wasn't. Those are the facts, not the alternative facts. Don't like it, then show me the language from the EO, because that's the only place that the fact of the claim of Biden's language can actually come from. If you can't show me any such actual language from the EO then you're the one peddling alternative facts. And so far you've consistently failed to do so.

Yes. I was pointing out to the pp that when it was clear there is no language backing up his/her assertion, his/her response was essentially the citation doesn’t matter. Because s/he just “knows it’s true”.

The EO doesn’t say what s/he is claiming. I agree with you!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Cite the specific language! Cite the specific language!"

LOL. Men dressed as women are chasing their "sorority sisters" around with their erections and men dressed as women are raping people in women's prisons. Liberal judges are approving of this and making it happen based on their interpretation of the law. Who cares about citing language when this is already the defacto law of the land under the current regime.

Indeed. Who cares about citing language. You’ll just stick with your alternative facts, amirite?

Liar

https://genevievegluck.substack.com/p/kappa-kappa-gamma-women-lose-last

https://slatereport.com/news/horrific-ordeal-of-female-inmate-who-says-she-was-raped-in-prison-by-bearded-62-trans-cellmate-who-then-perversely-claimed-to-be-the-victim/

https://www.foxnews.com/us/third-strike-trans-rape-suspect-prompts-rebellion-against-ca-law-after-attack-womens-prison

https://www.nysun.com/article/oklahoma-pedophile-changes-pronouns-to-she-her-after-receiving-life-sentence-to-federal-prison

So now we're changing the subject from womens athletic changing rooms to womens prisons. Which has absolutely NOTHING to do with Biden's Title IX EOs. Sure sign of a failed argument, changing the subject like that.

The bigger takeaway is that women are unhappy with biological men invading their space - whether it's Lia Thomas at Penn or their cellmate in prison. Like it or not, it's a political issue now.

Why is it a sudden political issue now? Athletics have had protocols in place for decades to deal with unfair competition, whether doping or otherwise. They already have the tools, but some of the orgs are being stupid about it. Claiming it's somehow Joe Biden's fault because of non-existent language in an EO doesn't really cut it. Are there transwomen on the US Olympics team? No. Nor are there transwomen in many many other areas of womens sports. People want to claim that Joe Biden ordered some kind of massive tectonic shift in the area of transwomen in sports but that simply isn't materializing to be true in the vast majority of how womens sports are being run. Likewise, prisons have had protocols in place for decades to deal with prisoners who pose a threat to other prisoners. How is anything different now somehow suddenly Joe Biden's fault?

Again, people keep repeating asking for evidence of actual Biden EO language saying where men can swing their dingalings in womens spaces and consistently there has been a total fail to produce any such language.

As such I think this isn't really anything real in terms of Biden policy and instead is just largely being contrived by right wing anti-trans activists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Cite the specific language! Cite the specific language!"

LOL. Men dressed as women are chasing their "sorority sisters" around with their erections and men dressed as women are raping people in women's prisons. Liberal judges are approving of this and making it happen based on their interpretation of the law. Who cares about citing language when this is already the defacto law of the land under the current regime.

Indeed. Who cares about citing language. You’ll just stick with your alternative facts, amirite?

Liar

https://genevievegluck.substack.com/p/kappa-kappa-gamma-women-lose-last

https://slatereport.com/news/horrific-ordeal-of-female-inmate-who-says-she-was-raped-in-prison-by-bearded-62-trans-cellmate-who-then-perversely-claimed-to-be-the-victim/

https://www.foxnews.com/us/third-strike-trans-rape-suspect-prompts-rebellion-against-ca-law-after-attack-womens-prison

https://www.nysun.com/article/oklahoma-pedophile-changes-pronouns-to-she-her-after-receiving-life-sentence-to-federal-prison

So now we're changing the subject from womens athletic changing rooms to womens prisons. Which has absolutely NOTHING to do with Biden's Title IX EOs. Sure sign of a failed argument, changing the subject like that.

The bigger takeaway is that women are unhappy with biological men invading their space - whether it's Lia Thomas at Penn or their cellmate in prison. Like it or not, it's a political issue now.

Why is it a sudden political issue now? Athletics have had protocols in place for decades to deal with unfair competition, whether doping or otherwise. They already have the tools, but some of the orgs are being stupid about it. Claiming it's somehow Joe Biden's fault because of non-existent language in an EO doesn't really cut it. Are there transwomen on the US Olympics team? No. Nor are there transwomen in many many other areas of womens sports. People want to claim that Joe Biden ordered some kind of massive tectonic shift in the area of transwomen in sports but that simply isn't materializing to be true in the vast majority of how womens sports are being run. Likewise, prisons have had protocols in place for decades to deal with prisoners who pose a threat to other prisoners. How is anything different now somehow suddenly Joe Biden's fault?

Again, people keep repeating asking for evidence of actual Biden EO language saying where men can swing their dingalings in womens spaces and consistently there has been a total fail to produce any such language.

As such I think this isn't really anything real in terms of Biden policy and instead is just largely being contrived by right wing anti-trans activists.

Because it's a good narrative. Just like women having third term abortions for the fun of it. They're not real issues that genuinely affect 99 percent of women. But Democrats always seem to go with the most extreme positions. And Republicans are going to town with it because Democrats are refusing to advocate for basic common sense, particularly with trans issues in regards to sports, prisons, puberty blockers, surgery etc. Easy issue for Republicans to rile things up.

[Anonymous]

It's left wing pro trans activists contriving things. Like access to women's sororities, women's prisons, children's classrooms, etc.

It's working! With or without Joe Biden himself, men ARE swinging their dingalings in women's spaces, and liberal judges are helping them do it.

You go, girl! Swing that thing!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's left wing pro trans activists contriving things. Like access to women's sororities, women's prisons, children's classrooms, etc.

It's working! With or without Joe Biden himself, men ARE swinging their dingalings in women's spaces, and liberal judges are helping them do it.

You go, girl! Swing that thing!

+1. I could not care less about trans people being trans. You want to chop off your body parts and change your name? Knock yourself out.

What I do care about is when men enter women’s sports, prisons, and locker rooms.

So if you keep males out of women’s spaces, then it’s a non issue. I wonder why Dems are pushing so hard on this issue?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's left wing pro trans activists contriving things. Like access to women's sororities, women's prisons, children's classrooms, etc.

It's working! With or without Joe Biden himself, men ARE swinging their dingalings in women's spaces, and liberal judges are helping them do it.

You go, girl! Swing that thing!

+1. I could not care less about trans people being trans. You want to chop off your body parts and change your name? Knock yourself out.

What I do care about is when men enter women’s sports, prisons, and locker rooms.

So if you keep males out of women’s spaces, then it’s a non issue. I wonder why Dems are pushing so hard on this issue?

Because dems have brains and are human. Unlike the GOP party of pedos. Don's spiritual advisor raped a 12 year old. Mike & Sarah Huckabee love them Duggars to death. GOP party of idiots for following a fat orange two bit conman from flushing who literally started an illegal teen modeling agancy where was your outrage then?????? State of NY had to close it down but GOP party of pedos loved that illegal teen modeling agency.....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's left wing pro trans activists contriving things. Like access to women's sororities, women's prisons, children's classrooms, etc.

It's working! With or without Joe Biden himself, men ARE swinging their dingalings in women's spaces, and liberal judges are helping them do it.

You go, girl! Swing that thing!

+1. I could not care less about trans people being trans. You want to chop off your body parts and change your name? Knock yourself out.

What I do care about is when men enter women’s sports, prisons, and locker rooms.

So if you keep males out of women’s spaces, then it’s a non issue. I wonder why Dems are pushing so hard on this issue?

Because dems have brains and are human. Unlike the GOP party of pedos. Don's spiritual advisor raped a 12 year old. Mike & Sarah Huckabee love them Duggars to death. GOP party of idiots for following a fat orange two bit conman from flushing who literally started an illegal teen modeling agancy where was your outrage then?????? State of NY had to close it down but GOP party of pedos loved that illegal teen modeling agency.....

So much deflection in one post.

All sex offenders should be in prison, GOP or Dem.

Including men who expose themselves to women, even if they are pretending to be women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Cite the specific language! Cite the specific language!"

LOL. Men dressed as women are chasing their "sorority sisters" around with their erections and men dressed as women are raping people in women's prisons. Liberal judges are approving of this and making it happen based on their interpretation of the law. Who cares about citing language when this is already the defacto law of the land under the current regime.

Indeed. Who cares about citing language. You’ll just stick with your alternative facts, amirite?

Liar

https://genevievegluck.substack.com/p/kappa-kappa-gamma-women-lose-last

https://slatereport.com/news/horrific-ordeal-of-female-inmate-who-says-she-was-raped-in-prison-by-bearded-62-trans-cellmate-who-then-perversely-claimed-to-be-the-victim/

https://www.foxnews.com/us/third-strike-trans-rape-suspect-prompts-rebellion-against-ca-law-after-attack-womens-prison

https://www.nysun.com/article/oklahoma-pedophile-changes-pronouns-to-she-her-after-receiving-life-sentence-to-federal-prison

So now we're changing the subject from womens athletic changing rooms to womens prisons. Which has absolutely NOTHING to do with Biden's Title IX EOs. Sure sign of a failed argument, changing the subject like that.

The bigger takeaway is that women are unhappy with biological men invading their space - whether it's Lia Thomas at Penn or their cellmate in prison. Like it or not, it's a political issue now.

Why is it a sudden political issue now? Athletics have had protocols in place for decades to deal with unfair competition, whether doping or otherwise. They already have the tools, but some of the orgs are being stupid about it. Claiming it's somehow Joe Biden's fault because of non-existent language in an EO doesn't really cut it. Are there transwomen on the US Olympics team? No. Nor are there transwomen in many many other areas of womens sports. People want to claim that Joe Biden ordered some kind of massive tectonic shift in the area of transwomen in sports but that simply isn't materializing to be true in the vast majority of how womens sports are being run. Likewise, prisons have had protocols in place for decades to deal with prisoners who pose a threat to other prisoners. How is anything different now somehow suddenly Joe Biden's fault?

Again, people keep repeating asking for evidence of actual Biden EO language saying where men can swing their dingalings in womens spaces and consistently there has been a total fail to produce any such language.

As such I think this isn't really anything real in terms of Biden policy and instead is just largely being contrived by right wing anti-trans activists.

Because he’s trying to change Title IX.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Cite the specific language! Cite the specific language!"

LOL. Men dressed as women are chasing their "sorority sisters" around with their erections and men dressed as women are raping people in women's prisons. Liberal judges are approving of this and making it happen based on their interpretation of the law. Who cares about citing language when this is already the defacto law of the land under the current regime.

Indeed. Who cares about citing language. You’ll just stick with your alternative facts, amirite?

Liar

https://genevievegluck.substack.com/p/kappa-kappa-gamma-women-lose-last

https://slatereport.com/news/horrific-ordeal-of-female-inmate-who-says-she-was-raped-in-prison-by-bearded-62-trans-cellmate-who-then-perversely-claimed-to-be-the-victim/

https://www.foxnews.com/us/third-strike-trans-rape-suspect-prompts-rebellion-against-ca-law-after-attack-womens-prison

https://www.nysun.com/article/oklahoma-pedophile-changes-pronouns-to-she-her-after-receiving-life-sentence-to-federal-prison

So now we're changing the subject from womens athletic changing rooms to womens prisons. Which has absolutely NOTHING to do with Biden's Title IX EOs. Sure sign of a failed argument, changing the subject like that.

The bigger takeaway is that women are unhappy with biological men invading their space - whether it's Lia Thomas at Penn or their cellmate in prison. Like it or not, it's a political issue now.

Why is it a sudden political issue now? Athletics have had protocols in place for decades to deal with unfair competition, whether doping or otherwise. They already have the tools, but some of the orgs are being stupid about it. Claiming it's somehow Joe Biden's fault because of non-existent language in an EO doesn't really cut it. Are there transwomen on the US Olympics team? No. Nor are there transwomen in many many other areas of womens sports. People want to claim that Joe Biden ordered some kind of massive tectonic shift in the area of transwomen in sports but that simply isn't materializing to be true in the vast majority of how womens sports are being run. Likewise, prisons have had protocols in place for decades to deal with prisoners who pose a threat to other prisoners. How is anything different now somehow suddenly Joe Biden's fault?

Again, people keep repeating asking for evidence of actual Biden EO language saying where men can swing their dingalings in womens spaces and consistently there has been a total fail to produce any such language.

As such I think this isn't really anything real in terms of Biden policy and instead is just largely being contrived by right wing anti-trans activists.

Sorry, same PP, but also which area of sports has no transwomen competitors? Thx!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's left wing pro trans activists contriving things. Like access to women's sororities, women's prisons, children's classrooms, etc.

It's working! With or without Joe Biden himself, men ARE swinging their dingalings in women's spaces, and liberal judges are helping them do it.

You go, girl! Swing that thing!

+1. I could not care less about trans people being trans. You want to chop off your body parts and change your name? Knock yourself out.

What I do care about is when men enter women’s sports, prisons, and locker rooms.

So if you keep males out of women’s spaces, then it’s a non issue. I wonder why Dems are pushing so hard on this issue?

Because dems have brains and are human. Unlike the GOP party of pedos. Don's spiritual advisor raped a 12 year old. Mike & Sarah Huckabee love them Duggars to death. GOP party of idiots for following a fat orange two bit conman from flushing who literally started an illegal teen modeling agancy where was your outrage then?????? State of NY had to close it down but GOP party of pedos loved that illegal teen modeling agency.....

Also trans billionaire and millionaire $ and pharma $. And most people still believe that transwomen mostly cut off their d?cks so they aren’t grossed out yet.
The more we “listen to trans people”, the more ridiculous we learn it is.

[Anonymous]

https://x.com/Howlingmutant0/status/1788154761453162696

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's left wing pro trans activists contriving things. Like access to women's sororities, women's prisons, children's classrooms, etc.

It's working! With or without Joe Biden himself, men ARE swinging their dingalings in women's spaces, and liberal judges are helping them do it.

You go, girl! Swing that thing!

+1. I could not care less about trans people being trans. You want to chop off your body parts and change your name? Knock yourself out.

What I do care about is when men enter women’s sports, prisons, and locker rooms.

So if you keep males out of women’s spaces, then it’s a non issue. I wonder why Dems are pushing so hard on this issue?

Because dems have brains and are human. Unlike the GOP party of pedos. Don's spiritual advisor raped a 12 year old. Mike & Sarah Huckabee love them Duggars to death. GOP party of idiots for following a fat orange two bit conman from flushing who literally started an illegal teen modeling agancy where was your outrage then?????? State of NY had to close it down but GOP party of pedos loved that illegal teen modeling agency.....

So much deflection in one post.

All sex offenders should be in prison, GOP or Dem.

Including men who expose themselves to women, even if they are pretending to be women.

+1,000,000,000

[Anonymous]

We have made a lot of progress on the trans rights agenda in this administration

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-58974627.amp

And you haters can please refrain from telling Admiral Levine she has to chop off her body parts, thank you very much.

[Anonymous]

It’s not a crime to “expose yourself” while innocently getting changed in the locker room that fits your gender identity. Not all women’s genitals look the same. Calling for punishment for basic clothes changing behavior is irresponsible. And it would never stand up in court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We have made a lot of progress on the trans rights agenda in this administration

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-58974627.amp

And you haters can please refrain from telling Admiral Levine she has to chop off her body parts, thank you very much.

So what makes Levine “trans” then? It’s not getting rid of male genitalia, so what defines being “trans”?