Help me understand Republican women in their 30s and 40s

[Anonymous]

"Cite the specific language! Cite the specific language!"

LOL. Men dressed as women are chasing their "sorority sisters" around with their erections and men dressed as women are raping people in women's prisons. Liberal judges are approving of this and making it happen based on their interpretation of the law. Who cares about citing language when this is already the defacto law of the land under the current regime.

[Anonymous]

https://www.newsweek.com/judge-sides-trans-sorority-member-accused-inappropriate-erection-1822852

https://www.yahoo.com/news/3rd-strike-trans-rape-suspect-080011578.html

Tremaine Carroll, 51, is an incarcerated biological male who identifies as a woman and faces two charges of forcible rape. Carroll was the public face of a campaign to support California law SB 132, which allows transgender prisoners to be housed in a facility consistent with their gender identity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"Cite the specific language! Cite the specific language!"

LOL. Men dressed as women are chasing their "sorority sisters" around with their erections and men dressed as women are raping people in women's prisons. Liberal judges are approving of this and making it happen based on their interpretation of the law. Who cares about citing language when this is already the defacto law of the land under the current regime.

Indeed. Who cares about citing language. You’ll just stick with your alternative facts, amirite?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Cite the specific language! Cite the specific language!"

LOL. Men dressed as women are chasing their "sorority sisters" around with their erections and men dressed as women are raping people in women's prisons. Liberal judges are approving of this and making it happen based on their interpretation of the law. Who cares about citing language when this is already the defacto law of the land under the current regime.

Indeed. Who cares about citing language. You’ll just stick with your alternative facts, amirite?

Liar

https://genevievegluck.substack.com/p/kappa-kappa-gamma-women-lose-last

https://slatereport.com/news/horrific-ordeal-of-female-inmate-who-says-she-was-raped-in-prison-by-bearded-62-trans-cellmate-who-then-perversely-claimed-to-be-the-victim/

https://www.foxnews.com/us/third-strike-trans-rape-suspect-prompts-rebellion-against-ca-law-after-attack-womens-prison

https://www.nysun.com/article/oklahoma-pedophile-changes-pronouns-to-she-her-after-receiving-life-sentence-to-federal-prison

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Residents in Democratic-voting states." Huh. That's an odd way to put it. Why not just say Democrats? Unless...

Looking into it...Ah, yes indeed, it turns out that this formulation was a deliberate attempt to obscure the reality that, yes, Republicans live longer Democrats. (This shouldn't be that surprising because life expectancy is correlated with income and attractiveness.)

Here's Dr. Fauci's agency again, confirming that Republicans live longer:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37874332/

It's kind of funny that Democrats ignore the science and falsely imagine that they are richer, better-looking, and longer-lived on average than Republicans.

I am a hard core democrat, live in a deep blue area and have to agree that Republican women are better looking.

Do you have a fetish for women who have double chins and wear Duck Dynasty trucker hats?

Recognizing beauty does not equal to a fetish, you pervert.

"Yes, you too can put on an extra 40 pounds, buy some camo gear and be recognized as a beauty!"
Great sales pitch. Notify Madison Avenue!

You're comparing upper income democratic women to lower income Republican women. If you do a like/like comparison of classes, Republican women tend to dress and behave in more typically feminine ways, which men find more alluring. I used to live in a very blue state and now live in a red state. There is much greater pressure in a red state to look beautiful and fashionable.

You compare pro-palestine protesters defacing statues and mentally unwell men with erect penises in women's changing rooms to everyday Democrats, which is ABSOLUTELY NOT a like/like or even remotely legitimate comparison. If you don't like having unfair comparisons dished out at you then maybe you need to stop doing it yourself.

Unfortunately the Biden administration enshrined those penises in there by changing Title 9. I'm a Dem and I'm extremely embarrassed by some of the far left insanity our party has aligned with recently.

Enough already. I will give you that there are 2, maybe 3 folks that will vote on this issue but that is it. Discuss something else for a change.

I disagree strongly. Plenty of people, men and women don’t want men playing women’s sports or changing in women’s locker rooms.

We are aware. Ok. Maybe there are 4 of you.

Polling indicates most Americans don’t want men in women’s prisons and sports teams.

So yeah, 4 of us, or most of America

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So Republican women are transphobic and vote accordingly. That seems to be the takeaway here. No matter what issue is raised on this thread, the GOP poster turn it pack to transgenderism every single time.

That is your business but you should know that transgenderism is quite rare and you are letting a very rare phenomenon control your one vote.

It quite rare for males to believe that they are females, yet we have removed women’s right to single sex spaces in order accommodate this exceedingly rare phenomenon.

I wonder why it’s all women who must compromise and not the very rare male phenomenon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:.07% of the female US population is playing a college sport yearly. I’m not saying they don’t matter, I’m just talking figures.
.7% of the female US population is imprisoned, with women having a 1% chance of incarceration over their lifetime. That is a big increase over the last 25 years, but it’s still a very small percentage of American women.

56% of American women have a child in their lifetime. That doesn’t include women who get pregnant but don’t end up having a child for whatever reason. And pregnancy is dangerous. Pregnancy can kill you.

so ultimately Republican women are just not good a judging risk.
They’ve got their reasons, they just aren’t good ones.
And when you show them numbers it doesn’t matter.
It is what it is.

You’re a disgusting bottom feeder to suggest that it’s all right to cede safety in girls sports and the safety of female prisoners because a nasty subgroup of men demand it. You’re also a complete idiot not to see how evil and hateful democrats are to force women to accept male fetishists in female spaces, sports and medicine in return for abortion.

“Wah! I get so mad when people point out the ridiculous math of stupid convictions! Why can’t women just quietly die in childbirth and let me remain an ignoramus in peace!”
It’s ok girl.
Stay dumb. It’s fine.

Ah, you must be one of the “trans women” who prowl this board harassing women who aren’t on board with your agenda. One can always tell a man by how he mansplains women and isn’t intellectually up to grasping simple concerns women face. My abortion rights won’t come at the cost of vulnerable women dealing with your lantern jaw and erect penis in women’s domestic violence shelters or my daughter being denied access to the fair competition that builds girls’ self-esteem. No woman is expendable to me because I’m not a LARPing man like you.

How many transwomen are competing in the 2024 Olympics?

What's that? None?

Just the sound of some loon yelling about erect penises in the background here

I don’t want to vote for people who devalue me. Neither Democrats or Republicans. All of your gaslighting doesn’t change that.

If I'm gaslighting then tell me how many trans women are competing in the 2024 Olympics. If the number is not zero, I will apologize to you. If it IS zero, you can apologize to ME.

What? Man, you are crazy. Why on earth do you think fundamentally rewriting sex-based rights is limited to the 2024 Olympics? What on earth does the Olympics have to do with anything?

Why on earth do you think fundamentally everyone should make transwomen the biggest existential threat on the planet, around which we need to base our next vote, ignoring every other issue on the planet?

And did you go out and buy that portable faraday cage yet? Given the average American woman has a statistically higher chance of being struck by lightning than being beaten in sports by a transwoman...

Why are you so obsessed with putting women in cages? Revealing.

Sorry hon, this is your own logic at work, given you believe that the whole country should be as hysterical about transwomen as you are and you pushing the need to regulate the lives of transwomen the top national priority and basis for elections, because a woman might have to compete in sports against a transwoman, how do you reconcile that with the fact that the likelihood of the average American woman actually having to compete in sports against a transwoman IS LOWER THAN her likelihood of being struck by lightning. A faraday cage protects against electrical discharge.

It has absolutely nothing to do with "wanting to put women in cages," you utter twit. But do keep going on, making yourself look like a deranged fool all the more.

Sorry brah, but you will never a woman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Cite the specific language! Cite the specific language!"

LOL. Men dressed as women are chasing their "sorority sisters" around with their erections and men dressed as women are raping people in women's prisons. Liberal judges are approving of this and making it happen based on their interpretation of the law. Who cares about citing language when this is already the defacto law of the land under the current regime.

Indeed. Who cares about citing language. You’ll just stick with your alternative facts, amirite?

The PP essentially claimed that Joe Biden's EO language gives men the absolute right to prance around buck naked in front of women in their changing rooms with erect penises. I asked for the specific language that did this. The PP couldn't provide any such language from Joe Biden's EOs to back it up. Just some order that resulted from some right wing anti-trans extremists shopping a lawsuit in a court run by a Trump-appointed judge that, like the PP, also "interpreted" (meaning, pretended) the language was there when it wasn't. Those are the facts, not the alternative facts. Don't like it, then show me the language from the EO, because that's the only place that the fact of the claim of Biden's language can actually come from. If you can't show me any such actual language from the EO then you're the one peddling alternative facts. And so far you've consistently failed to do so.

[Anonymous]

"And it is the same with every issue. Deny the existence of transgenderism. Deny election results. Deny climate change. Deny the crime rate dropping. Deny that trump trashed the border bill. Deny deny deny. deny the existence of things that are actually real. GOP is the party of gaslighting."

This is the problem in a nutshell. We Democrats enthusiastically adopt propaganda messages from government and media, convert them in our brains into "scientific facts," and then angrily adopt a censorious totalitarian view that anyone who disagrees with us is "bad" or "lying."

Pro tip: If we get most of our beliefs from politicians, propagandists, and peers, we shouldn't be so sure of the accuracy of our beliefs. And we should be even less sure that these beliefs make us more intelligent or more moral than people who disagree with us.

Catastrophic Global Warming is a long-term future prediction made by a computer model. A prediction, not the result of a science experiment. There is a lot of debate about the predictions, the proposed ameliorations, and the cost of those ameliorations. To frame such a complex issue as "We believe the proper things and the rival political party denies them" is embarrassingly simplistic self-flattery.

The 2020 election was decided by 100,000 votes out of 155 million. 0.07%. To eke out that victory, we needed dramatic changes to voting procedures, an extra 25 million votes beyond any previous election, and an extra week of counting. This was an unusual election, our system is far from bulletproof, and election fraud does exist (and people regularly get criminally convicted of it). Are we really winning any hearts and minds by insisting that mentioning election irregularities is some kind of crazy "denial" of the "reality" of flawless elections?

"Trump trashed the border bill." This is a cute little talking point we used to win a news cycle. But even I can admit that Trump was tougher on the border than Biden. I like Biden because he's more compassionate to migrants. How can I now claim Biden wants to slam the door on migrants but Trump is standing in his way? Sorry, but on this one I think it's our side doing the gaslighting.

Anyway, this is what we have come to. We read establishment news that favors our party, we believe it deeply (or pretend to believe it, cynically) and we tell ourselves that those who disagree are "dumb" "deniers" for not reciting our political talking points as if they were scientific facts.

We give ourselves 100% credit for being correct and morally right on every issue, and we give our neighbors 0% credit for even having brains. We tell ourselves that the other half of the country is wrong about everything and is motivated solely by racist hate.

If I'm honest with myself, I don't think my Democratic parents and grandparents would be too impressed by our priorities, our beliefs, our overconfidence in them, or the disrespect we show our neighbors for their differing opinions.

Back in the day, we were smarter, more humble, more charitable, and more neighborly. We never used to call our neighbors "deniers" and we never used to call for them to be censored for daring to disagree with us.

If we want our party to keep leading the country, we're going to have to be a little less disrespectful toward the people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Cite the specific language! Cite the specific language!"

LOL. Men dressed as women are chasing their "sorority sisters" around with their erections and men dressed as women are raping people in women's prisons. Liberal judges are approving of this and making it happen based on their interpretation of the law. Who cares about citing language when this is already the defacto law of the land under the current regime.

Indeed. Who cares about citing language. You’ll just stick with your alternative facts, amirite?

Liar

https://genevievegluck.substack.com/p/kappa-kappa-gamma-women-lose-last

https://slatereport.com/news/horrific-ordeal-of-female-inmate-who-says-she-was-raped-in-prison-by-bearded-62-trans-cellmate-who-then-perversely-claimed-to-be-the-victim/

https://www.foxnews.com/us/third-strike-trans-rape-suspect-prompts-rebellion-against-ca-law-after-attack-womens-prison

https://www.nysun.com/article/oklahoma-pedophile-changes-pronouns-to-she-her-after-receiving-life-sentence-to-federal-prison

So now we're changing the subject from womens athletic changing rooms to womens prisons. Which has absolutely NOTHING to do with Biden's Title IX EOs. Sure sign of a failed argument, changing the subject like that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:.07% of the female US population is playing a college sport yearly. I’m not saying they don’t matter, I’m just talking figures.
.7% of the female US population is imprisoned, with women having a 1% chance of incarceration over their lifetime. That is a big increase over the last 25 years, but it’s still a very small percentage of American women.

56% of American women have a child in their lifetime. That doesn’t include women who get pregnant but don’t end up having a child for whatever reason. And pregnancy is dangerous. Pregnancy can kill you.

so ultimately Republican women are just not good a judging risk.
They’ve got their reasons, they just aren’t good ones.
And when you show them numbers it doesn’t matter.
It is what it is.

You’re a disgusting bottom feeder to suggest that it’s all right to cede safety in girls sports and the safety of female prisoners because a nasty subgroup of men demand it. You’re also a complete idiot not to see how evil and hateful democrats are to force women to accept male fetishists in female spaces, sports and medicine in return for abortion.

“Wah! I get so mad when people point out the ridiculous math of stupid convictions! Why can’t women just quietly die in childbirth and let me remain an ignoramus in peace!”
It’s ok girl.
Stay dumb. It’s fine.

Ah, you must be one of the “trans women” who prowl this board harassing women who aren’t on board with your agenda. One can always tell a man by how he mansplains women and isn’t intellectually up to grasping simple concerns women face. My abortion rights won’t come at the cost of vulnerable women dealing with your lantern jaw and erect penis in women’s domestic violence shelters or my daughter being denied access to the fair competition that builds girls’ self-esteem. No woman is expendable to me because I’m not a LARPing man like you.

How many transwomen are competing in the 2024 Olympics?

What's that? None?

Just the sound of some loon yelling about erect penises in the background here

I don’t want to vote for people who devalue me. Neither Democrats or Republicans. All of your gaslighting doesn’t change that.

If I'm gaslighting then tell me how many trans women are competing in the 2024 Olympics. If the number is not zero, I will apologize to you. If it IS zero, you can apologize to ME.

What? Man, you are crazy. Why on earth do you think fundamentally rewriting sex-based rights is limited to the 2024 Olympics? What on earth does the Olympics have to do with anything?

Why on earth do you think fundamentally everyone should make transwomen the biggest existential threat on the planet, around which we need to base our next vote, ignoring every other issue on the planet?

And did you go out and buy that portable faraday cage yet? Given the average American woman has a statistically higher chance of being struck by lightning than being beaten in sports by a transwoman...

Why are you so obsessed with putting women in cages? Revealing.

Sorry hon, this is your own logic at work, given you believe that the whole country should be as hysterical about transwomen as you are and you pushing the need to regulate the lives of transwomen the top national priority and basis for elections, because a woman might have to compete in sports against a transwoman, how do you reconcile that with the fact that the likelihood of the average American woman actually having to compete in sports against a transwoman IS LOWER THAN her likelihood of being struck by lightning. A faraday cage protects against electrical discharge.

It has absolutely nothing to do with "wanting to put women in cages," you utter twit. But do keep going on, making yourself look like a deranged fool all the more.

Sorry brah, but you will never a woman.

Who said anything about being a brah or being a woman? You're kinda nutty, ya know?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Republican women are transphobic and vote accordingly. That seems to be the takeaway here. No matter what issue is raised on this thread, the GOP poster turn it pack to transgenderism every single time.

That is your business but you should know that transgenderism is quite rare and you are letting a very rare phenomenon control your one vote.

It quite rare for males to believe that they are females, yet we have removed women’s right to single sex spaces in order accommodate this exceedingly rare phenomenon.

I wonder why it’s all women who must compromise and not the very rare male phenomenon.

Nope, biological women who are gay are also being forced to compromise because they don't fit the mold. You want bathroom police to have them kicked out of womens bathrooms and changing rooms too. Goes to show you don't really care about women at all - you just hate anyone who isn't exactly like you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.newsweek.com/judge-sides-trans-sorority-member-accused-inappropriate-erection-1822852

https://www.yahoo.com/news/3rd-strike-trans-rape-suspect-080011578.html

Tremaine Carroll, 51, is an incarcerated biological male who identifies as a woman and faces two charges of forcible rape. Carroll was the public face of a campaign to support California law SB 132, which allows transgender prisoners to be housed in a facility consistent with their gender identity.

They have, or should have SHUs for that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Cite the specific language! Cite the specific language!"

LOL. Men dressed as women are chasing their "sorority sisters" around with their erections and men dressed as women are raping people in women's prisons. Liberal judges are approving of this and making it happen based on their interpretation of the law. Who cares about citing language when this is already the defacto law of the land under the current regime.

Indeed. Who cares about citing language. You’ll just stick with your alternative facts, amirite?

Liar

https://genevievegluck.substack.com/p/kappa-kappa-gamma-women-lose-last

https://slatereport.com/news/horrific-ordeal-of-female-inmate-who-says-she-was-raped-in-prison-by-bearded-62-trans-cellmate-who-then-perversely-claimed-to-be-the-victim/

https://www.foxnews.com/us/third-strike-trans-rape-suspect-prompts-rebellion-against-ca-law-after-attack-womens-prison

https://www.nysun.com/article/oklahoma-pedophile-changes-pronouns-to-she-her-after-receiving-life-sentence-to-federal-prison

So now we're changing the subject from womens athletic changing rooms to womens prisons. Which has absolutely NOTHING to do with Biden's Title IX EOs. Sure sign of a failed argument, changing the subject like that.

The bigger takeaway is that women are unhappy with biological men invading their space - whether it's Lia Thomas at Penn or their cellmate in prison. Like it or not, it's a political issue now.

[Anonymous]

As the party of gay sex instruction for kids
drag queen story hour
and a million abortions every year

As the party of illegal immigration
and endless affirmative action
inflation and taxation
climate controls and covid patrols
endless war
dementia and more

We simply cannot wrap our minds around how any remotely educated woman today could consider herself a part of the Republican party