Kevin Costner divorce

[Anonymous]

They seem equally pissed off at each other. Seems like both of them out for revenge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am also on KCs side regarding the divorce / financial agreement.

Asking for almost 300k a month in child support is insane.

People had a meltdown when Kevin Federline asked for 25k a month. This is more than ten times that. It is nonsense.

It's nuts because it's more than most Californians make in a year. He could spite her and pick a random family to give that amount to each month. On the other hand I really wonder what he did to make the divorce this ugly. Jeff Bezos's divorce wasn't this nasty. She is hella mad and out for revenge that's for sure.

Bezos didn’t have a prenup that MacKenzie was trying to get out of.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am also on KCs side regarding the divorce / financial agreement.

Asking for almost 300k a month in child support is insane.

People had a meltdown when Kevin Federline asked for 25k a month. This is more than ten times that. It is nonsense.

Britney Spears worth 60 million
Kevin Costner worth 400 million

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am also on KCs side regarding the divorce / financial agreement.

Asking for almost 300k a month in child support is insane.

People had a meltdown when Kevin Federline asked for 25k a month. This is more than ten times that. It is nonsense.

Britney Spears worth 60 million
Kevin Costner worth 400 million

She made 100 million on the Vegas residency alone. Then all her tours, merch, albums, streaming, etc. Conservative estimates are more in the range of 350 million

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I liked him until all this garbage starting coming out. Not a good look, can't believe his publicist isn't telling him this. And using all his money to finance a future project, not buying it. What a scum bag.

Yea, that’s not how it works. That’s not how any of this works. If the prenup isn’t enforced/they don’t settle, the judge isn’t going to go - oh whoops, you’ve spent all your money on XYZ, guess there is nothing to give to the ex.

Moving assets around and hiding money is exactly how it works. I've seen millionaire men in my own orbit WITHOUT prenups successfully do this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He is an ass. He could giver her 30 million and his life would not change.

He earned that money. It is his, his kids, and his grandkids. His heirs. Not a gold digging ex wife who signed a pre-nup to blow and for whatever grifter con artist men she comes in contact with to hustle out of her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:$1mm out of his fortune seems like a deliberate statement. I haven't followed this story, but it makes me wonder if he's offering her so little because he's angry. Did she cheat or initiate the divorce and he didn't want to divorce?

If not, this makes him look petty and stingy to the mother of his children.

It’s the amount she asked for in the prenup.

He cheated.

Unless the prenup had a cheating clause, it’s irrelevant. And given the info leaked by both sides, there’s no cheating clause.

I’m shocked a lawyer would have agreed to such a paltry amount in a pre nup with no cheating clause. Who was advising her?!

She was 18 and he was almost 40 years old.

She was 30. You liar.

[Anonymous]

Women are capable competent beings who can make their own money. She should stick to the prenup she agreed to and anything she wants beyond that, she can earn herself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am also on KCs side regarding the divorce / financial agreement.

Asking for almost 300k a month in child support is insane.

People had a meltdown when Kevin Federline asked for 25k a month. This is more than ten times that. It is nonsense.

It's nuts because it's more than most Californians make in a year. He could spite her and pick a random family to give that amount to each month. On the other hand I really wonder what he did to make the divorce this ugly. Jeff Bezos's divorce wasn't this nasty. She is hella mad and out for revenge that's for sure.

Bezos didn’t have a prenup that MacKenzie was trying to get out of.

MacKezie helped build the business. She quit a Wall Street job and worked at Amazon and was there working when it made $0 for 15 years.

MacKenzie did not get Jeff’s money she got her money.

KC’s wife did not do anything to advance his career.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am also on KCs side regarding the divorce / financial agreement.

Asking for almost 300k a month in child support is insane.

People had a meltdown when Kevin Federline asked for 25k a month. This is more than ten times that. It is nonsense.

People also thought it was hilarious when Tiger Woods locked his live-in girlfriend of six years out of his mansion and refused to give her a cent because she signed an NDA and agreement when they first started dating.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am also on KCs side regarding the divorce / financial agreement.

Asking for almost 300k a month in child support is insane.

People had a meltdown when Kevin Federline asked for 25k a month. This is more than ten times that. It is nonsense.

It's nuts because it's more than most Californians make in a year. He could spite her and pick a random family to give that amount to each month. On the other hand I really wonder what he did to make the divorce this ugly. Jeff Bezos's divorce wasn't this nasty. She is hella mad and out for revenge that's for sure.

Bezos didn’t have a prenup that MacKenzie was trying to get out of.

MacKezie helped build the business. She quit a Wall Street job and worked at Amazon and was there working when it made $0 for 15 years.

MacKenzie did not get Jeff’s money she got her money.

KC’s wife did not do anything to advance his career.

Nobody is saying that McKenzie is like Christine. Just commenting that a much more high stakes divorce had less public nastiness than the Costners.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I liked him until all this garbage starting coming out. Not a good look, can't believe his publicist isn't telling him this. And using all his money to finance a future project, not buying it. What a scum bag.

Yea, that’s not how it works. That’s not how any of this works. If the prenup isn’t enforced/they don’t settle, the judge isn’t going to go - oh whoops, you’ve spent all your money on XYZ, guess there is nothing to give to the ex.

Moving assets around and hiding money is exactly how it works. I've seen millionaire men in my own orbit WITHOUT prenups successfully do this.

Google Hakimi.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am also on KCs side regarding the divorce / financial agreement.

Asking for almost 300k a month in child support is insane.

People had a meltdown when Kevin Federline asked for 25k a month. This is more than ten times that. It is nonsense.

It's nuts because it's more than most Californians make in a year. He could spite her and pick a random family to give that amount to each month. On the other hand I really wonder what he did to make the divorce this ugly. Jeff Bezos's divorce wasn't this nasty. She is hella mad and out for revenge that's for sure.

Bezos didn’t have a prenup that MacKenzie was trying to get out of.

MacKezie helped build the business. She quit a Wall Street job and worked at Amazon and was there working when it made $0 for 15 years.

MacKenzie did not get Jeff’s money she got her money.

KC’s wife did not do anything to advance his career.

Nobody is saying that McKenzie is like Christine. Just commenting that a much more high stakes divorce had less public nastiness than the Costners.

No prenup with MacKenzie. Apples and oranges.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like she had a bad lawyer, or no lawyer, when she was negotiating the prenup 20 years ago. After 20 years, with his net worth, and his lifestyle needed to travel a lot, she should be getting more than that. The prenup should’ve been on more of a vesting schedule where she got more depending on how long they were married.

It’s so stupid when rich famous men try to screw their wives this way. It’s much smarter to give them enough money and perhaps an agreement not to malign in press or do a book deal

NP. Nobody cares. I’m sorry, but all the hysterics in this thread claiming that KC will lose fans are delusional. First, if they even know about it, there will be a lot of people who look at the situation and say, she was 30, she had a lawyer herself, and she signed a contract, too bad. Second, nobody cares what male celebrities do. Tom Cruise is hugely popular, for instance.

This thread seems to be populated by women who have a meager understanding of California pre-nup litigation. She could challenge but she is probably going to lose.

I don’t really understand all the takes in this thread that seem totally untethered to reality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like she had a bad lawyer, or no lawyer, when she was negotiating the prenup 20 years ago. After 20 years, with his net worth, and his lifestyle needed to travel a lot, she should be getting more than that. The prenup should’ve been on more of a vesting schedule where she got more depending on how long they were married.

It’s so stupid when rich famous men try to screw their wives this way. It’s much smarter to give them enough money and perhaps an agreement not to malign in press or do a book deal

NP. Nobody cares. I’m sorry, but all the hysterics in this thread claiming that KC will lose fans are delusional. First, if they even know about it, there will be a lot of people who look at the situation and say, she was 30, she had a lawyer herself, and she signed a contract, too bad. Second, nobody cares what male celebrities do. Tom Cruise is hugely popular, for instance.

This thread seems to be populated by women who have a meager understanding of California pre-nup litigation. She could challenge but she is probably going to lose.

I don’t really understand all the takes in this thread that seem totally untethered to reality.

For someone who claims not to care, you post a lot.