Yes, because we are much older than they are, worked hard, and saved, and moved from a higher col area so for us, the houses here were cheaper. I went to a cheap no name state u because I came from a poor background. |
+1 Spot on. |
Asian Americans in general actually understate the harm from the AA since many Asians tend not to complaint. |
If you didn't have such an inferiority complex, you'd realize that's seasoned advice from academic advisors who have been around the block. They know the dim students never "catch up" to peers from cutthroat magnets and elite prep schools in 3.5 years. Kids are baked in the cake by age 19. |
So true, my kid who graduated from TJ few years ago said his top 10 university (STEM double major) was actually easier than TJ and graduated with 4.0 gpa from the university. He never received A- from any classes. |
Cry me a River Op.
If you’re not a white, Christian, male in America then you have to prove yourself. Period. Black, Hispanic, South Asian, East Asian, Muslim, Hindu, Jewish, or a woman. You are marked. You have a stereotype that is woven into the fabric of this country. Sucks to suck. - I’m 3 of the above, lucky me. |
The chart doesn’t support that URM students are getting into Harvard (or Yale) with 1090 scores. The chart supports that the scores are at least at the 90% percentile, which is why the OP called BS on the original post. Big difference between 1090 and 1390. The OP didn’t claim that the scores for URM students are the SAME for white and Asian students. |
And we don’t have “extraordinary talent and effort” scores. Maybe the Black kids admitted have higher scores in connection with self-driven activities. Maybe the other kids do have a lot of rich kid/rich kid accomplishments, like research papers done at high-cost summer programs, but the lower-SAT Black kids have held responsible paid jobs, cared for special needs siblings, brought important programs to their schools, or done other things that really stand out and were about more than checking a box. |
Well, if I’m wrong, adjust for that and show me. But it could well be the Black kids from private schools and UMC have roughly the same stats as the white kids. Even if that’s incorrect, segregation, racism and race-related poverty are blights on our society that hurt us all. If letting some Black kids get into Harvard with slightly below average SATs can somehow help reduce race-related income, wealth and health gaps, then, seriously, go for it. Any costs related to that are very small when compared with the harm done by race-related poverty. |
Race-related poverty *is* a blight on our society. Going to ask you if wealthy black folk and/or African immigrants getting into Harvard is going to change that in your opinion? Because Appalachia surely is still a problem even with all those rich white boys buying their spots at Harvard. |
that chart shows what the chart shows.. that the average black students admitted to Harvard have a much lower score than their Asian American counter parts. You are being obtuse if you don't realize that Asian Americans have to far outperform every single group to be admitted to those schools. |
I am not arguing that point- Asian American students are higher and have to outperform. If you reread my post, the data doesn’t support that URM students are getting into Harvard or any Ivy with sub 90% scores, which was asserted on this thread. |
This thread has been dominated by two distinct partisan group positions
1. Asian students have to outperform to gain admittance to the top schools 2. URM students are getting into the top schools with scores that wouldn't qualify them for admittance to their local community college One position is worth humane discussion. The other is pure venom and should be treated as such. |
I absolutely agree with you that this is not fair. The simplest solution - getting rid of affirmative action, so no one would have any doubt! |
I have discussed this with my DD (we are south Asian) and the way we think about it is like this. Schools like Harvard are a lottery. The threshold at which you can reasonably buy a lottery ticket is different for different groups of kids (urms, legacies, etc). But it’s a lottery for everyone. And that is the key point. These “stats” are not what get you into the school - we all knew there are plenty of 4.0/stellar EC/1600 kids who get rejected. All these stats do is make you competitive to have your application read thoroughly. That’s it. And it is true no matter which group you fall into. |