Well, I got to this thread a bit late, but a few random observations. There are asymmetries in dating. Women tend to want a guy their height or taller, men tend to prefer the opposite. Does this actually -matter- in a relationship, no, but on average this is what people want and consequently tall women and short men find they are operating from a smaller pool of dating candidates. Men (on average) value physical attractiveness, which correlates strongly with youth, far more highly than women. Women care about a man's income/success/status far more than men. Similarly, men are open to dating their age or potentially significantly younger while women tend toward the reverse. Imagine two 25 year olds, one man, one woman, both making $50k at a non-profit, both physically attractive. The woman could choose to date her male equivalent, but can also easily choose to date a huge range of higher earning more "successful" guys her age and much older. OP's male equivalent (a fairly attractive upper-30s+ guy earning 250k+) would be perfectly happy dating a 25 year old marine biologist making $50k at some save the whales non-profit and wouldn't give a moment's thought to paying her way on a vacation somewhere or taking her out to dinner, or whatever. Guys in their 20s are relatively rarely successful and/or high earners. As you start talking about guys in their 40s and up you start seeing significantly more guys that could be described as such. Meanwhile women in their 20s that are quite attractive are relatively common, but women that could be fairly called attractive in their 40s or 50s are few. (I am not talking about a "pretty" face here, I mean looking good in a two-piece bathing suit without anything wrapped around your waist.) OP says she is attractive, but even if we assume that is true, she has limited her search to attractive high earning guys who want to date a divorced mom in her 30s. So... good luck with that. |
Nope! I called her trash for knowingly making vows to another person that she knew, for sure, T the time that she did not mean. Anyone who goes in with the pure intention to keep their vows but ends up divorced is just...divorces. That's fine. That's life. But if you know you don't mean the vows and you get married anyway, knowing you are lying and likely going to ruin someone's life and tear up a family, you're trash. You are mocking the very institution. |
Amen. |
“I promise to love you in good times and in bad, in sickness and in health, and FOR REALSIES. This time, I swear, I mean it. I mean, I know I swore it last time, but THIS time, for real for real.” |
WOW. You are crazy. Many, many people are pressured into getting married. You must have have been raised traditionally. Many of these bad marriages last and you think there is some award for it. Unbelievable. Marriage is always a risk. It is not 100% whether there are vows said or not. Many people get to an age where they feel like they "should" or everyone says they "should"--especially for women. You are out of touch with how a lot of women are raised. |
Get over yourself. Not everything works according to plan. Not everyone is showing their true colors at the altar. People sign up for things and then the person can do a complete 180. Get a grip. |
I meant it the first time. My first husband didn’t and began abusing me. Do you really think staying would have been good for my daughters? |
BTW, I intended to stay married despite being miserable. You have no idea how bad it became. I had to leave. I never intended to "ruin" someone's life. In fact, he ruined mine. He turned out to be the opposite of the preson he pretended to be. That hesitation was my inner voice knowing something was truly off...I just could not see it yet. You are a horrible person making such terrible comments when you are just making huge assumptions. |
And I’m not 09:33. Marital abuse is more common than people want to acknowledge. |
Nope! This is what you said (if this wasn’t you, then I’m NOT TALKING ABOUT YOU): “This is so rude. I was unsure of marriage. I did not want to go through with it. I did anyway. There were no vows.” I did not want to go through with it; I did anyway. That is not “oh there was some nagging feeling I couldn’t quite place.” Nope, that was clear as day. I DID ANYWAY. That’s a choice, right there. Eyes open. “There were no vows”? What the eff does THAT mean? Even if you are in a courthouse, there are vows. Whether they are simply legal, or legal and spiritual, there is no such thing as a marriage with no vows. And if you make a vow knowing you don’t mean it, you are trash. |
You are ridiculous, my kids absolutely have not. My eldest testified against my first H. |
PP seems to have a screw loose. You can’t rationalize with a crazy person, so don’t even bother. The people who are trash are those who judge others. I can’t imagine being in a marriage, even a great one, where you feel like you are stuck forever no matter what happens is a good feeling. I have no intention of getting divorced, but I breathe easier knowing if DH suddenly turned into an a super/alcoholic/cheater, I wouldn’t be stuck. These things happen every day to people who think they’ll never happen to them. Just read these boards and you’ll see such stories! |
Why did you marry someone who had to be testified against? |
No one is saying you should stay with someone who, say, later in life BECOMES an alcoholic or starts cheating or hitting or whatnot. No one should stay in a bad marriage. But if you KNEW YOU DIDN’T MEAN THE VOWS WHEN YOU SAID THEM, wow, talk about “having a screw loose.” And notice that no one has yet attempted to explain what “there were no vows” means. Hmm? Anyone care to justify or rationalize that little phrase? |
I'm a new poster. I just wanted to say you're embarrassing yourself and should probably go take a xanax or a nap. |