DP. What’s stupid is your failure to recognize satire. |
You don't even see it, do you. You: not hating group X, but hating group Y instead |
I don’t hate “Group Y.” I hate their hatred and horrific treatment of other people. Refusing to tolerate intolerance doesn’t make me hateful. |
The /s is absolutely required on here because people say crazy stuff. |
DP. Kinda does, actually. Or maybe it’s your overt scorn for my brown, church-going, LMC in-laws who voted for Trump. (I didn’t). |
DP. Kinda doesn't, actually. Maybe try using your brain for, like, more than 2 seconds? |
| I didn't cut them off, but I lost a lot of respect for them. Our relationship isn't what it once was, mostly from me keeping them at arms length. |
No, it doesn’t. That’s stupid. You are under no obligation to accept hate and intolerance. If anything we need less acceptance of it. Being brown doesn’t exempt you from scorn if you make awful decisions. |
+1 |
I realize this is the new line of MAGA but it's BS. You all hate and demonize other groups because . . . whatever your reasons. You think people need to be a certain type to have value. I don't HATE you b/c of it (though I also have little nice to say). You are entitled to your viewpoint, whatever I think of it. Dems aren't trying to tell you you can't think that, you can have the benefits of civil society, we're not restricting your right to go to church, we're not denying you your orders for wedding cakes. . . . I can go on and on. What we ARE saying is that your views are intolerant and bigoted in many instances, and that is our viewpoint to have and communicate. And it is our right to point that out to you. Further, Dems are defending those having their rights stripped and their humanity demeaned by you. We are saying they have the same rights as you do (the benefits of civil society) and that government and government sanctioned activity (and private activity over which there constitutional protections) should treat everyone equally. That's not hating any group. You're not a victim. Maga isn't a victim. So quit acting like you are by having to share societies privileges and benefits. |
They neither hate nor are particularly intolerant (by mainstream, commonly-accepted definitions). They’re remarkably kind, tolerant and community-minded people, whose politics I happen to vehemently disagree with. Your categorization of them, OTOH, is inaccurate, intolerant and remarkably arrogant. |
With respect (NP), you don't get to tell other people how they feel. Pointing out bigotry and that certain people are voting against their interests is not hate. It's not scorn. Don't be silly. I get that you feel defensive. But the reason why is not what others think of you, it's that you know your positions are bigoted and hateful. And you don't like that pointed out to you. |
Remarkably kind, tolerant, and community-minded people don't vote for politicians who run on a platform of dehumanizing political opponents, deporting immigrants, and are convicted sexual assaulters, tax cheats, and grifters. They just don't. Sorry you haven't accepted that yet. It is jarring when we find out those we love are not as we expected them. |
“We need to be available to head into the office occasionally, sometimes on short notice.” Then change the subject. |
They actually do. That’s your mistake. They do so bc they disagree with some of your characterizations, and/or bc they are willing to accept certain shortcomings in pursuit of what they view as the greater good. Your disdain for these people (again, URM, LMC) who give extraordinary amounts of time and money to their disadvantaged communities is grossly misplaced. And no, love for them is most emphatically not affecting my view. They’re in-laws, after all. Good in-laws, but still in-laws. 😁 |