
PP here. I agree with all you’ve said and yes it can be a sticky point in marriage. The gifts are not insignificant to us either and I trust that my DH is using it wisely. I would have words with him though if he was neglecting our mortgage and spending it purely on himself. Even then, like you said though, it is still hard because we can’t really dictate to our spouse what they must do with gifts that are directly for them. However the specifics of any couples circumstances are though, these conversations and gentle or strong suggestions are always best left for when the couple is alone, and definitely not with any parents around. |
I agree with PP - you are a piece of work, and that is not intended as a compliment. Your initial comment was to your DH. Your follow-up comment was to your MIL and it was rude, just like your posts. |
I'm going to disagree with everyone here. First of all it would be one thing if they were in the kind of financial situation where $1000 is chump change. In that case husband should go ahead and spend it on whatever he wants. It seems that they are not in this situation and $1000 is a significant windfall of money for them. Of course the wife wants to spend it on something practical and useful and a renovation is obviously something that benefits both of them. I could see myself exclaiming something like this out of excitement because $1000 for me is almost a whole paycheck and I certainly wouldn't expect my husband to go buy himself a new guitar or something when we badly need this money for our crumbling house. |
So it's the MIL fault the DIL is rude and said a rude comment? |
I'm glad I'm not married to someone selfish like you. |
Exactly |
Actually this is a valid point. I do think the couples financial situation would make a difference in terms of how involved a spouse may want to be in suggesting or having ideas around a gift of funds. Still… I think because it involves money and it is someone else birthday, you have to filter yourself and allow them to have their exchange. If you don’t refrain and you exclaim something you cannot be too surprised if the other party also exclaims something not entirely appropriate for the moment. |
How is the poster selfish? She actually said she might use it for bills and household stuff. It actually sounds like she is simultaneously considerate, responsible, and selfless (in spending the money on household needs versus purely herself). Not sure what about her comment triggered you but anyone would be lucky to be married to someone who receives personal gifts of money and spends it on their family instead of on themselves. |
Unless you don't trust your husband with money why would you need to say it out loud right then? |
You shouldn’t have said anything in front of her. You can discuss it privately later.
My MIL has given me money and said it is to be used for YOU for something fun. She’d be annoyed if DH immediately piped up to declare how the money should be spent. |
NP here. First let me clarify that in my response to you I'm referencing the fact that you said most MILs are protective of her son's money not the MIL in the OP. You are saying that MILs get "protective" of her son's money but that's just it marriage is about teamwork and once married it isn't seem as "her" money or "his" money but rather "their" money. That's how the law sees it unless we are talking about an inheritance here or something but that's not what you are referencing to. Marriage is a partnership. I also must add that somehow I don't think MIL would be singing the same tune if say the wife/DIL was using what would be considered "her" money to treat herself to a monthly pedicure or a girl's weekend here and there. It wouldn't be seen as hey she works hard and deserves to treat herself it would be seen as by MIL that money could also be used to fix up the deck or something else that would benefit MIL's son or how selfish DIL is to use something that strictly benefits her instead of using it towards her husband as well. But somehow it's not ok for the DIL to want family money to be used towards something that benefits the two of them because she is taking the son's money to fix up their deck. What the what? Are there really crazy MILs out there that think like that because that's some hypocritical bullshit. Otherwise if money is still considered "husband's" or "wife's" than how is that different than just being roommates? So your point of saying MILs in general are protective of their son's money even after marriage is moot and doesn't make any sense because usually marriage money is a sense is combined. Also MIL only listening to the son when he said the exact same thing as the DIL shows MIL's hypocrisy. Also MIL has no idea how they split up the finances. Maybe it looks on the outside like her son makes more money and maybe he does but maybe DIL contributes in other non financial ways such as cleaning or cooking. |
The MIL's reaction is her own responsibility. Someone saying something you interpret as rude or hurtful does not give you carte blanche to do whatever you want. |
OP was in the wrong with her comment but what makes you think your last sentence is the case? 99% means almost all. I feel like most MIL/DIL relationships are lovely and some would be even considered close. You just read about the "bad" MIL or DILs on here because people don't come to a public forum to say, "My MIL came over for dinner last night and we ate a delicious dinner, watched a movie, and talked about the next family vacation." IRL most of my friends and family either get along well with their MIL or are even close to them. |
Exactly. Which is why the DIL should have kept her snark to herself when she didn't like the response. |
This is off topic but my belief is that in laws are always the class enemies or whatever the Marxist expression is. Their interests are fundamentally different from each other. Some people are civilized enough to not show it. Rubbing it into any in law’s face that what was intended for their blood relative is going to be used by their SO - is a recipe for disaster. |