Girl Raped at Rockville HS

[Anonymous]

This is on WMAL again this morning. 630AM

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Now on FOX News...
That shyster lawyer!!

Does anyone know this guy or know more about him? He's obviously doing this for the fame since he's already on FOX news, lol

I went to college with him. Had mutual friends. From what I remember about him, it is not surprising that he took this case. Big talker. Opportunist for sure.

What's the opportunity here? Just the fame, IMO.

Will other lawyers respect the fact that he took this case? I'm not a lawyer, so I have no idea how this is perceived.

Most importantly, I'm curious as to who's paying for his fees!

Tucker Carlson asked him this question.
What this attorney said is that the family retained him - the defendant’s father hired him.
He wouldn’t get into other details when pressed.

[Anonymous]

I doubt the rapist's father could ever afford to hire this lawyer. Most of us couldn't afford his astronomical fees.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I doubt the rapist's father could ever afford to hire this lawyer. Most of us couldn't afford his astronomical fees.

So, either the lawyer is doing this pro bono, or some group with deep pockets is paying him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I doubt the rapist's father could ever afford to hire this lawyer. Most of us couldn't afford his astronomical fees.

So, either the lawyer is doing this pro bono, or some group with deep pockets is paying him.

Yes. Can he really keep this hidden forever?
He's about to be interviewed on WMAL radio.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Regarding the claim that it was consensual sex... I have trouble believing that any woman would consent to anal sex in a toilet stall at 9am. Much less a 14 year old girl.

This was my main thought.

I was pretty sexually adventurous in college.

But, anal sex? In a toilet stall? At 9am? While on my period?!?

NO F$cking Way! Not even wasted on tequila. There is NO WAY this was consensual for a 14 year old girl.

People saying it was consensual need to read the police report and think about their own daughters/neices.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I doubt the rapist's father could ever afford to hire this lawyer. Most of us couldn't afford his astronomical fees.

So, either the lawyer is doing this pro bono, or some group with deep pockets is paying him.

Yes. Can he really keep this hidden forever?
He's about to be interviewed on WMAL radio.

This lawyer is making all the media rounds. Obvious what his intentions are.

[Anonymous]

On WMAL, the lawyer said that in order to charge statutory rape in MD, there has to be a 4 year difference between the age of the two involved.
Then, he said that is why the state did not charge with statutory rape.

No, they charged him with rape. They didn’t charge with statutory rape because there was no consent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:On WMAL, the lawyer said that in order to charge statutory rape in MD, there has to be a 4 year difference between the age of the two involved.
Then, he said that is why the state did not charge with statutory rape.

No, they charged him with rape. They didn’t charge with statutory rape because there was no consent.

There isn't a jury or a judge alive that is going to buy this lawyer's BS. Everyone has a right to legal representation and this lawyer is only doing his job by representing this guy. But even vaguely implying that this girl wanted this or asked for it is going to backfire BIG TIME.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:On WMAL, the lawyer said that in order to charge statutory rape in MD, there has to be a 4 year difference between the age of the two involved.
Then, he said that is why the state did not charge with statutory rape.

No, they charged him with rape. They didn’t charge with statutory rape because there was no consent.

Maybe they can now work in proving that this man was not 18. My guess is that he was older.

Who has the girl hired as an attorney?? Can she afford one?

How about someone step up to do her case pro bono. I posted before. Set up a GoGundMe. You'd get tons of support for her in the Rockville Clister (at the very least).

Of course, much different for her as the rape victim. But the attacker has lawyered up with the best.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:On WMAL, the lawyer said that in order to charge statutory rape in MD, there has to be a 4 year difference between the age of the two involved.
Then, he said that is why the state did not charge with statutory rape.

No, they charged him with rape. They didn’t charge with statutory rape because there was no consent.

There isn't a jury or a judge alive that is going to buy this lawyer's BS. Everyone has a right to legal representation and this lawyer is only doing his job by representing this guy. But even vaguely implying that this girl wanted this or asked for it is going to backfire BIG TIME.

+1

[Anonymous]

Convictions in rape cases are rare, it's sad but true, even involving kids. The defense is always consent. When there is a conviction it is often due to a plea bargain to a misdemeanor, look up the stats yourself.

Re who is paying his lawyer, it is a valid question and it IS likely to be a Soros funded group.

The STATE prosecutes crimes, the girl is a witness possibly. There is no role for her to hire a lawyer in those proceedings.

Sometimes an accused rapist sues a victim in a civil action, or vice versa. In a civil action she could use a lawyer.

Case was just mentioned on NPR, briefly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the posters that mentioned and linked other news stories about rapes at US schools:

It's an ugly picture.

Alief middle school, TX. 2016. 3 boys rape a 7th grader, a fourth takes video of it. The actual ages of all involved are not released.
This is a school that is 62% Hispanic, less than 1% White. 85% free lunch, free lunch is income under $15K!
And on further research, the area is a magnet for ex convicts, due to housing policy.

You libs should try to imagine your kid having to attend a school like that.

What say you?

I posted a link about 3 or was it 4 white HS boys in ID I think who raped a mentally disabled black boy with a clothes hanger. As a minority or a parent of a SN child, try imagining your kids going to school with these white kids.

And what makes you think some liberals don't have kids who go to schools with this kind of ses/racial makeup?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Convictions in rape cases are rare, it's sad but true, even involving kids. The defense is always consent. When there is a conviction it is often due to a plea bargain to a misdemeanor, look up the stats yourself.

Re who is paying his lawyer, it is a valid question and it IS likely to be a Soros funded group.

The STATE prosecutes crimes, the girl is a witness possibly. There is no role for her to hire a lawyer in those proceedings.

Sometimes an accused rapist sues a victim in a civil action, or vice versa. In a civil action she could use a lawyer.

Case was just mentioned on NPR, briefly.

This was a particularly brutal assault and the girl left that bathroom and told someone (a teacher?) about it right away. I don't care who is throwing money at this defense. The lawyer is already making mistakes...IMO.

[Anonymous]

Is it verified that the attorney is working pro-bono? I know of at least one advocacy group with $7M in income and I'm sure their are others.