From the Haaretz link posted earlier: Among those in the latter group are Eran and Maya Sadeh, who live in the north of the country. They say that the most shocking piece of information they came across about circumcision, and the one that influenced them most deeply was the view of Maimonides on the subject ?(see Circumcision in Judaism below?). The great 13th century physician and philosopher “accorded emasculating justification to circumcision,” Eran Sadeh says. “He maintained explicitly that it is done in order to affect male sexuality and reduce the pleasure of the sex act. For me, that connected with female circumcision and shocked me. I immediately read up on the physiological aspects and understood that what Maimonides said is correct: Circumcision affects the functioning of the genital organ in sexual relations. “I connected that with my legal knowledge about human rights and understood that it’s wrong from that point of view as well. You take a person in the most vulnerable and helpless condition and amputate part of his body. Maimonides talks about that, too. Circumcision is performed when the infant is eight days old, because the bond between the parent and the child is not yet very strong and the parent is capable of inflicting this on his son. It is a gross violation of human rights, perpetrated by none other than the child’s parents, those who are responsible for protecting him.” read more: http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/even-in-israel-more-and-more-parents-choose-not-to-circumcise-their-sons-1.436421 So... does Eran Sadeh have "issues with Jews," because he finds circumcision barbaric? Give me a break. If you really think about it, it's going to be one of those practices that is increasingly difficult to justify as society becomes more secular. Along with Israeli marriage laws and the rest. It has nothing to do with having "issues with Jews," and everything to do with opposing a certain kind of fundamentalist thinking based on literal interpretations of a text written a very long time ago. |
I know what a secular Israeli is, but I am not familiar with the opinion of secular Israelis on circumcision, especially that subset of secular Israelis who marry gentiles. I would suggest DCUM is probably not the best place to find people familiar with that. As a practicing Conservative Jew, I am not sure why this is a big deal to your husband. Without knowing that, I cannot give advice to your situation. It is not the fault of Judaism, or of observant Jews, that your husband wants to circumcise an halachically non-Jewish child. The ceremony remains meaningful to us, and in a world where some would ban it, discussions calling it barbaric are a concern to me. But that is a different issue from what you should do. |
In the case of Jewish parents (by birth or choice) with a Jewish son, it is a question of the kind of person the parents are - not the kind of person the child is. IE are they the kind who follow Jewish law and tradition or not? There are plenty of articles on the spiritual meaning of this particular mitzvah, as for many others, but it seems kind of pointless to repeat them for someone NOT obligated by the tradition to follow it. Its what PP said - you don't want to do it, so don't. No one in the Jewish community cares - other than maybe your DH, and we cannot speak for him. This is about you and him, and I am uncomfortable with your issue with him making this a hook to discuss the meaning of bris mileh for traditional Jews. |
Not to quibble, but Reform Judaism is arguably lot closer to Orthodoxy theologically-speaking than Reconstructionist Judaism. At any rate, the point is that neither of those movements consider Halacha binding. There's also a lot of overlap in the movements, since most communities don't have the resources and numbers to support both a Recon and a Reform synagogue. As a practical matter, I have most definitely lived both sides of the coin. |
Correct. I am articulating the Orthodox view of what it means to practice Judaism, which holds that being Jewish = being obligated to follow Jewish law. (And to clarify, a Jew'a failure to follow Jewish law doesn't make them not Jewish or less Jewish. They're still Jewish; they're just violating Jewish law.) Your claim about circumcision is absolutely false, at least with respect to the Orthodox movement. You need a pin prick even if you're already circumcised. No Orthodox rabbi would sanction a conversion without circumcision. I have no idea what the other movements have to say, but it does indeed look like they are dropping the circumcision requirement, as well as Jewish law altogether, for that matter. Not sure what remains, other than liberal humanism. (Which is fine, but what's the point in insisting that it's Judaism? Just be a good liberal human, if that's what you want.) |
I read what you said, and I don't think there is much that Conservative/Masorti Judaism disagrees with (I would say that being Jewish is about more than keeping Jewish law - "one can be a cad within the halacha" and "derech eretz kadma le torah" - but then I think most Orthodox believe that as well. ) As for dropping Jewish Law in Reform, that happened over 150 years ago, its not something they are just getting around to. If anything they have been inching back towards it over the last 40 years or so. In the case of bris mileh though, this was something that was universal practice in Reform 40 years ago, not out of respect for halacha, but as deeply, deeply embedded folkway, and the assault on circumcision in the wider culture appears to have eroded that. |
Yeah, I am Conservative, and I would not be surprised to hear that a Reform rabbi did not require circumcision, but I would be very surprised to hear that a Conservative rabbi did not. Of course, I don't know what goes on in other people's houses or trousers. And I think the "pin prick" rule is pretty standard. We were told that if the baby was circumcised in the hospital, they would do a pin prick at the bris to complete the ritual. We had an Orthodox rabbi perform our son's bris and he did ask if DH was circumcised! So there is at least one guy out there inquiring about adults. It was part of his information-gathering: are both parents born Jewish, were all grandparents Jewish, everyone circumcised, any converts, anyone a kohen or levi, etc. I've no idea what he would have said if we had responded in the negative, but then again you don't ask an Orthodox rabbi to perform a bris unless you are serious about it. (And actually, he did my nephew's bris also and my BIL is not technically Jewish -- Jewish dad, Christian mom, no formal conversion -- so maybe he is more relaxed/easygoing than I might have expected.)
|
Arranged child marriage is religiously significant for some cultures. Yet it most likely will phase out as Western ideas of human/women's rights spread to other cultures. The same goes with female circumcision. Historically, you're just on the wrong side of this argument... sorry to say. Religiously meaningful practices that don't violate consent and so forth will probably be allowed to continue. I don't think this is really about anti-Semitism. Religious norms have constantly had to adjust to and interact with cultural ones. |
Good to know. So basically one benefit of not circumcising would be that it could dissuade people from converting to Orthodox Judaism. I will keep that in mind, thanks. |
Not a problem for us, since Judaism doesn't proselytize or encourage conversion in the first place. But great dig at Orthodox Judaism, anyway! What a tolerant piece of work you are! |
| I love circumcised penises. I love intact penises. I love Jews. I love non-Jews. Group hug, everyone! |
+1. and, if that was the OP, then i think a number of us posting on this thread that she is making this is more than just about circumcision have been validated. |
Well we see where you are coming from. If OP finds that helpful that is her business. |
|
My husband was born Jewish and I converted. Our family is pretty observant (Conservative movement) and we chose not to circumcise our son. It was a difficult decision at the time but we have never regretted it. DS has told us he is glad we made the choice we did. It may perhaps become an issue at some point in the future if he wants to marry an observant Jewish woman, but as in your case, the fact that I (and therefore he) are not considered Jewish by Orthodox Jews would be a bigger barrier than lack of circumcision.
In your case, I don't see any reason why you would circumcise your son. |
Please tell me how that convo with your DS went. I just don't even understand. How old was he? Mom: How do you like your penis? Son: It's great, thanks! |