I'm concerned this is the case of an Aspie child who was never evaluated or taught appropriately, as I've done all these years with my Aspie kid, and who doesn't know when, how and most importantly, to what degree, to express symptoms and feelings. Aspies often over-react or under-react to physical injury and abusive behavior (teasing, bullying) because they don't have a handy and instinctual graduated guide in their head to tell them what the appropriate response is. I've seen it time and time again with my husband and son, who are both high-functioning autistic. The immense majority of people with Asperger's are not and will never be physically violent, but for the minuscule subset that can be brought to violence, buying them a gun and ignoring their need for behavioral modification and specialized teaching can lead to lethal outcomes. |
I'll add that in many districts, once you involve a campus security officer, a report will be made to city or county police authorities. Student will have a history that will be documented. |
Yes. Consequences will happen. No exceptions. |
Sounds fine to me. |
I can promise you there are MANY parents of troubled kids who are not served through special education and those with special needs who have behavioral manifestations who won't think it's fine, but if school personnel are going to be subject to lawsuits, then time to tighten up. |
Well since those parents are part of the problem, I have no issues with their hurt feelings. |
|
Well, clearly the parents didn't bother having a therapist at all for the kid, because "gummint", and because they had no where to go when the school told them to get their kid help within 48 hours, and they knew it. Their answer: hand the kid a gun. I think they knew he was a serious problem and a potential threat to other students, and simply did not care. They cared about no one but themselves, and maybe wanted the kid to live out one of their sick fantasies of shooting something up - like a school. If the kid had a therapist (years over due), they would have thought to cooperate, but they could not be bothered with their own kid. Even took those parents 90 (!!!!!!) minutes to go pick him up, probably hoping the school would give up and send the killer back to class, which they ended up doing, eventually. And please, tell us why Tommy Tantrum was allowed to take a backpack into class, when the rule that applied to all students was that no backpacks were allowed in the classroom. Disgusting pieces of GARBAGE. Garbage in, garbage out. |
+1 We can only hope. The day to day is simply not safe with loose cannon parents and their loose cannon spawn. |
+1 Yup. Time to stop kowtowing to the problem parents. |
x10000000 Cpping mechanisms - if the parents don't have it, their kids won't either. Period. |
| *Coping |
They failed no notify the school safety officer, despite having real concerns that this student would be violent. And the steps they did take--failure to notify law enforcement, calling parents they knew to be negligent based on the student's social media posts, having the kid sitting in the office for hours without a bag check--made it more likely that he would engage in violence at school, not less. I don't think any of that is incorrect. Whether they will owe civil penalties for it in Michigan is not a thing I know. |
This is so idiotic. Why was he allowed to keep the drawing in his possession to change or destroy it? The school is going down in flames and they will deserve it. SHOCKINGLY mismanaged all around. |
OK, Pollyanna. They even refused to take him home that day. They’re Right Wing gun nuts. Mom wrote a Trump manifesto and texted “lol you have to learn not to get caught” when he googled ammunition sales in a school building. But I’m sure they’ll come out in the trial with all of the many, many documented and repeated efforts they made to get their son mental healthcare. Can’t wait.
|