Because they’re actually happy with their choices and have a full enough life not to spend their time this way. |
Also a lot of evidence that having a mother who works out of the home is associated with girls growing up to make more money as adults. And that certain professions that require a high degree of intellectual rigor are associated with lower levels of dementia in old age (the theory being that this is related to learning new things). Homemaker is not one of them. You should feel empowered to make whatever choice works for your family without the reliance on stats that aren’t specifically related to SAH. The world is full of people who are successful and had two working parents and that aren’t and had a sahp. |
Standing in society 🙄 |
| One of the weirder cons our society has ever been duped into is buying into the idea that your career is what should define your life or that a woman’s “contribution to society” via grinding for some corporation is to be valued more highly than raising and rearing her own children and focusing her energy and efforts into nurturing the emotional and spiritual well being of her family. Baffling how backward it is to me that women fought for this. |
We tried for 7 years to have our child. I went back to work for a little bit after my maternity leave. When my kid was 2, I decided that sitting in a cube pumping out spreadsheets as a financial analyst while I desperately missed my child wasn't a worthwhile tradeoff. Maybe some people have more interesting careers. My child is a teen now and I've never looked back. Our marriage is great and my financially we are doing better than I ever expected. DH is not a high earner, but we have a cozy house that is paid for and college is funded. |
What about men? |
But men should definitely “grind for some corporation.” Mama needs a new pair of shoes amirite?
|
NP -- I had the opposite experience: I went from being consumed and tunnel vision about my career to finally getting to explore the world outside of my work. It has been very enriching for all of us. The lesson of the true value of time, once the early years are past, is something that has to be experienced to be understood. DH and I wouldn't go back and change a thing. |
| I think the SAHM’s who simply cannot imagine working and having a functioning home life must think all jobs are inflexible and miserable. I SAH until my youngest went to ES and both DH and I have incredibly flexible and family friendly jobs that pay really well. We share home and child duties and no one is stressed or dysfunctional. Most families we know are the same. It just doesn’t fit the narrative of “I must stay home or this would NEVER work” people. But hey if their spouses buy that I guess it works for them. I’m personally glad that my husband wants to share the home load equally. |
DP: Their careers also should not define their lives. And a family with options has the right to decide which parent earns the income. And the reality for us has been that when we had children, we both needed to change the kind of work we did so that we could have a fuller life with our family. We recentered our focus. We exchanged more money for more time. But I disagree with PP about what women were fighting for; it is a gross misunderstanding to say that women were fighting to force every woman into the workplace and out of their homes. That was never the goal. Women fought for the right of women to get to choose to work and not be forced to stay at home if that wasn't their choice, and for women in the workforce, whether by choice or need, to be treated equally to men who work. Remember that not all women become mothers; not all mothers have partners; and not all families can or want to choose to have a parent at home. Women who work deserve to be treated the same as men who work. That is what women were fighting for. It never meant that families could never again choose to have a parent at home. The unfortunate consequence, however, is that the economy has shifted in a way that effectively eliminates that option for most families. |
It really isn't an either/or situation. Most people are saying it couldn't work for Me in My former job - not that there is no possible way in the world it could work for anyone. |
PP here. Some posters are reasonable like that. But some of the regular SAHM posters on this site argue that teens with working mothers are neglected and there is no possible way that a family could function in a healthy way with two working parents. To me that just tells me how checked out their spouse is. |
I think this is kind of a BS response. So, if she’s working she’s talking about work projects and likely complaining about employees. What’s so great about that? If you are an interesting person, and competent in conversation it doesn’t just fall by the wayside. My DH and I had a rule to not talk about kids On a date; it can be done. I think a spouse likely projects this “boring” on a sahm spouse as a new narrative. Women who are both home and at work focus too much on kids or gossip, which is boring. I have been working mom and sahm and talked about all kinds of things with DH. |
DP here. I was a SAHM for 13 years. And yes it’s true that some long term SAHM’s become really boring and have nothing interesting to talk about. Or obsess about the tiniest inconsequential things (like PTA politics or HOA drama or whatever.) We all know these people. In fact it’s part of why I went back to work. The longer I stayed home, the fewer “normal” women were still at all home too. Everyone I liked spending time with eventually went back to work. Sorry, it’s true. |
The PP seems out of touch. She didn't have to escalate with the PP - first to call them triggered, then a loser?! Hoping it's a just troll and the thread can move on. |