I don't object to the compounding. These drugs are off patent or about to go off patent. The objections around compounding or generics are mostly drug companies protecting their profits. FDA oversight doesn't mean the FDA inspects every batch. |
You think? It wouldn't appear that way. Not clearly, anyway. Your thought process is incredibly dysfunctional. You don't seem particularly bright. |
You don't seem particularly well read if you don't know the difference between distain/disdain so pardon me if I heavily discount anything you have to say. |
NP. I am supposed to take seriously a rabid anti-vaxxer published by Bari Weiss? |
I don't care what you do but you seem to think if you just use the right insult you will shut the conversation down. There are loads of active threads on this so that doesn't seem to be going too well for you. |
Uh, are you crazy or something? I haven’t posted in this thread at all, and questioning the source is something smart people should always do, not that you’d understand that. What is your issue? I don’t care what people discuss but I’m not going to read some hot nonsense from someone who has no credibility as a writer and take it seriously. Come back when you have an article from an actual legitimate source and stop trying to pretend your slop article is science. |
Are you crazy? I'm not the OP. we are all allowed to discuss any aspect of this without hall monitors trying to shut it down. I don't need to come back with anything to placate you, nutter. |
Please quote exactly, word for word, where I tried to shut down the conversation in my post. I want a specific quote. Tell me exactly what words I used that — and I am quoting you directly here — “shut the conversation down.” Give me my exact words where I said that, you crazy loon. Because I know you can’t. You made that up in your fevered and clearly insane mind. Hint: not fawning over someone with a known history of RFK-level false statements about science and health does not equate to “shutting down a conversation.” It is doing what anyone smart should do: evaluating the source. |
Claiming that most people have zero side effects on GLP-1s is not supported by current studies. Most suggest the opposite (with varying rates of occurrence and levels of severity). Side effects and cost are also the reasons most commonly given for most people stopping GLP-1s at about the one-year mark. Aside from rarer, more severe adverse effects, also concerning is that, according to a recent study in The British Medical Journal, people who come off GLP-1 drugs regain weight four times faster than (behavior-based) dieters. Most of us understand that these drugs are helping to resolve an intractable health issue for millions, and additionally may be shown to have other substantial benefits. But downplaying or distorting the current scientific understanding of their risks and downsides is unhelpful, and likely has the opposite of your intended effect. |
| This thread is motivating me to give lifestyle changes and diet overhaul another chance. I suspect many of the non obese, non diabetic users of glps are going to have to go back to basics once they stop taking it or when it is regulated away for otherwise healthy people. |
I want, tell me, give me. Who do you think you are? Buffoon. |
Bless your heart. Such pedantry. There we are, then. |
Ooh a big word you used correctly! You're learning. |
It's a temporary fix, but like everything else will not be sustainable over the long run. If it sounds too good to be true it probably is. |
If you're not overweight or diabetic why do you want to take a GLP1?? |