If you are a sugar baby why did you decide to be one?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand how you can be okay with sex outside marriage but be against prostitution. They are both wrong.

If by "sex outside marriage" you mean cheating on a spouse--? Correct, it's wrong.

If by "sex outside marriage" you mean premarital sex? Sex between two single, consenting adults? That is in no way equivalent to prostitution. Unless it involves oone person paying the other for the sex, which is exactly the definition of prostitution.

But I'm sure you know that, and are here to stir up sh*t with your vague implication that "sex outside marriage" = prostitution.

[Anonymous]

Aren’t their many college educated young women that are sugar babies? Makes me question the assumption that college all but guarantees upward mobility.

[Anonymous]

Why are women more likely to contemplate being a sugar baby than men?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a SB because it makes sense. Most men are cheaters or have some major flaw. Why settle down with someone who’s going to treat you.

I’m smart, beautiful, and in my 40s. I’ll ride it out til it ends.

Smart woman.

I'm doing this too! I'm early 40s, Masters in Kinesiology. I'm a personal trainer and Pilates teacher (own my studio) and thru that I meet tons of men. I'm very petite so I have alwys looked younger. I've been taken on wonderful trips and received beautiful jewelry and expensive bags and clothes. When I needed to upgrade my studio one of my guys gave me the money. It saves me tens of thousands on paying for my worldly vacations and I am keeping the goods to sell for extra retirement money.

I know I won't look like this forever but so far so good.

It amazes me why men waste their money like this. Can someone explain? Some wealthy women may do so but nowhere near the extent men do it.

I actually credit to this sexy sugar baby but not saying " because she deserved it".

Supply and demand. Because men like sex with attractive women out of their league and most can’t easily do that without paying for it. If men could do this for free they would, believe me. You can think of it as paying for experiences vs things.

At least a sugar baby is getting compensated for sleeping with old men who aren’t otherwise bringing any value to her life. The women who are strung along and sleeping around with unattractive men are the ones I pity more. Even worse if the man is married. A sugar baby at least accepts the relationship’s limitations and values herself enough to require compensation when sleeping with gross, old, or married men. And no, this is not an endorsement of prostitution, I make my own money and am raising strong girls.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why are women more likely to contemplate being a sugar baby than men?

Using what we got and using mens weakness for $

There are gay male sugar babies I'm sure

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand how you can be okay with sex outside marriage but be against prostitution. They are both wrong.

If by "sex outside marriage" you mean cheating on a spouse--? Correct, it's wrong.

If by "sex outside marriage" you mean premarital sex? Sex between two single, consenting adults? That is in no way equivalent to prostitution. Unless it involves oone person paying the other for the sex, which is exactly the definition of prostitution.

But I'm sure you know that, and are here to stir up sh*t with your vague implication that "sex outside marriage" = prostitution.

There is no difference between premarital sex and prostitution between 2 single consenting adults. They are both sins. Just because you pay the other person doesn’t make it any worse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Curious because I heard this term tossed around when I worked with both attractive and unattractive younger people and made it sound like a easy way to be able to afford things you couldn't. So if you are a sugar baby or were a sugar baby how old were you and why did you become one and why did you stop?

Married my sugar daddy. I wanted to hsve a nice life. It works out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand how you can be okay with sex outside marriage but be against prostitution. They are both wrong.

If by "sex outside marriage" you mean cheating on a spouse--? Correct, it's wrong.

If by "sex outside marriage" you mean premarital sex? Sex between two single, consenting adults? That is in no way equivalent to prostitution. Unless it involves oone person paying the other for the sex, which is exactly the definition of prostitution.

But I'm sure you know that, and are here to stir up sh*t with your vague implication that "sex outside marriage" = prostitution.

There is no difference between premarital sex and prostitution between 2 single consenting adults. They are both sins. Just because you pay the other person doesn’t make it any worse.

Thank you for clarifying that you believe all sex outside marriage to be a sin. Your prerogative of course, and I too am a person of religious faith; however, I do not consider all sex outside marriiage to be a sin. And equatiing consensual, loving, committed sex between unmarried people with prostitution is frankly incredibly wrong.

[Anonymous]

I had a college roommate who did this in college and likely throughout her twenties. She came from a wealthy family, was at the top of our class, and got a high-paying job after graduating. She was selective; the men she dated were older but not "old" and always attractive (though to me, at the time, all men over 25 seemed ancient). It was a power trip for her, 100%. We discussed it at length.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote: I had a college roommate who did this in college and likely throughout her twenties. She came from a wealthy family, was at the top of our class, and got a high-paying job after graduating. She was selective; the men she dated were older but not "old" and always attractive (though to me, at the time, all men over 25 seemed ancient). It was a power trip for her, 100%. We discussed it at length.

but what exactly was the arrangement here? were these wealthy boyfriends that took her 1st class to Paris that she wouldn’t have dated but for the money? Or were these guys handing her $500 after a “date”? The former is just some variety of relationship; the latter is prostitution.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: I had a college roommate who did this in college and likely throughout her twenties. She came from a wealthy family, was at the top of our class, and got a high-paying job after graduating. She was selective; the men she dated were older but not "old" and always attractive (though to me, at the time, all men over 25 seemed ancient). It was a power trip for her, 100%. We discussed it at length.

but what exactly was the arrangement here? were these wealthy boyfriends that took her 1st class to Paris that she wouldn’t have dated but for the money? Or were these guys handing her $500 after a “date”? The former is just some variety of relationship; the latter is prostitution.

Good point. More of the former, plus expensive gifts, including cash. She would ghost them if they weren't adequately "spoiling" her; she wasn't emotionally attached to any of them and often mocked them to us after dates.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: I had a college roommate who did this in college and likely throughout her twenties. She came from a wealthy family, was at the top of our class, and got a high-paying job after graduating. She was selective; the men she dated were older but not "old" and always attractive (though to me, at the time, all men over 25 seemed ancient). It was a power trip for her, 100%. We discussed it at length.

but what exactly was the arrangement here? were these wealthy boyfriends that took her 1st class to Paris that she wouldn’t have dated but for the money? Or were these guys handing her $500 after a “date”? The former is just some variety of relationship; the latter is prostitution.

The bold may not be technically prostitution, but in effect, it is to me.

This is why when I had a primarily physical relationship with one particular man, I ensured we split everything, hotel costs, meals, whatever. I didn't want or need anything from him that wasn't sex or companionship. He would have liked to give me gifts and said so, but as the relationship was a frank and direct one already, I said that though I liked that he wanted to give me things, I'd never accept them. Pity, since he had great taste. But I was getting what I wanted from him so we were on an equal footing.

If that comes off as my sounding superior, whatever. Fine. I think women who are sugar babies but have an education, a decent place to live, an income of their own, are sick. They should have sex with men they actually like and desire, rather than pimping themselves out for material cr*p and cash because they want designer bags and trips.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: I had a college roommate who did this in college and likely throughout her twenties. She came from a wealthy family, was at the top of our class, and got a high-paying job after graduating. She was selective; the men she dated were older but not "old" and always attractive (though to me, at the time, all men over 25 seemed ancient). It was a power trip for her, 100%. We discussed it at length.

but what exactly was the arrangement here? were these wealthy boyfriends that took her 1st class to Paris that she wouldn’t have dated but for the money? Or were these guys handing her $500 after a “date”? The former is just some variety of relationship; the latter is prostitution.

The bold may not be technically prostitution, but in effect, it is to me.

This is why when I had a primarily physical relationship with one particular man, I ensured we split everything, hotel costs, meals, whatever. I didn't want or need anything from him that wasn't sex or companionship. He would have liked to give me gifts and said so, but as the relationship was a frank and direct one already, I said that though I liked that he wanted to give me things, I'd never accept them. Pity, since he had great taste. But I was getting what I wanted from him so we were on an equal footing.

If that comes off as my sounding superior, whatever. Fine. I think women who are sugar babies but have an education, a decent place to live, an income of their own, are sick. They should have sex with men they actually like and desire, rather than pimping themselves out for material cr*p and cash because they want designer bags and trips.

You assume they don’t? lol they could be on the side.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: I had a college roommate who did this in college and likely throughout her twenties. She came from a wealthy family, was at the top of our class, and got a high-paying job after graduating. She was selective; the men she dated were older but not "old" and always attractive (though to me, at the time, all men over 25 seemed ancient). It was a power trip for her, 100%. We discussed it at length.

but what exactly was the arrangement here? were these wealthy boyfriends that took her 1st class to Paris that she wouldn’t have dated but for the money? Or were these guys handing her $500 after a “date”? The former is just some variety of relationship; the latter is prostitution.

The bold may not be technically prostitution, but in effect, it is to me.

This is why when I had a primarily physical relationship with one particular man, I ensured we split everything, hotel costs, meals, whatever. I didn't want or need anything from him that wasn't sex or companionship. He would have liked to give me gifts and said so, but as the relationship was a frank and direct one already, I said that though I liked that he wanted to give me things, I'd never accept them. Pity, since he had great taste. But I was getting what I wanted from him so we were on an equal footing.

If that comes off as my sounding superior, whatever. Fine. I think women who are sugar babies but have an education, a decent place to live, an income of their own, are sick. They should have sex with men they actually like and desire, rather than pimping themselves out for material cr*p and cash because they want designer bags and trips.

You don't sound superior at all. Some of these women have it all, and they marry their benefactors. Know your value in the dating market.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: I had a college roommate who did this in college and likely throughout her twenties. She came from a wealthy family, was at the top of our class, and got a high-paying job after graduating. She was selective; the men she dated were older but not "old" and always attractive (though to me, at the time, all men over 25 seemed ancient). It was a power trip for her, 100%. We discussed it at length.

but what exactly was the arrangement here? were these wealthy boyfriends that took her 1st class to Paris that she wouldn’t have dated but for the money? Or were these guys handing her $500 after a “date”? The former is just some variety of relationship; the latter is prostitution.

The bold may not be technically prostitution, but in effect, it is to me.

This is why when I had a primarily physical relationship with one particular man, I ensured we split everything, hotel costs, meals, whatever. I didn't want or need anything from him that wasn't sex or companionship. He would have liked to give me gifts and said so, but as the relationship was a frank and direct one already, I said that though I liked that he wanted to give me things, I'd never accept them. Pity, since he had great taste. But I was getting what I wanted from him so we were on an equal footing.

If that comes off as my sounding superior, whatever. Fine. I think women who are sugar babies but have an education, a decent place to live, an income of their own, are sick. They should have sex with men they actually like and desire, rather than pimping themselves out for material cr*p and cash because they want designer bags and trips.

You don't sound superior at all. Some of these women have it all, and they marry their benefactors. Know your value in the dating market.

If they "have it all" before they pimp themselves out, why any need to marry a "benefactor"? Oh, yes. Greed for more than "all" gives them. Their value in their own eyes is entirely based on how much they own and how expensive their lifestyle is.

And once they marry those benefactors (or don't marry them, but keep taking their money), what happens when these sugar babies/sugar wives get older, gain a pound--God forbid!!--or get pregnant?....Bye, baby, bye. But you'll say they're smart enough to stick some of that money in the bank while their sugar daddy has been sticking it to them. Hooray for their used up selves.