+1 we shouldn't have different standards for DUIs resulting in death vs. other types of intoxication, frankly. It seems we do. |
Is Ms. Brown a doctor now? |
You apparently don't know the entire history of hospitalization/commitment in the US PP. Of course you can commit people, if you change the law. |
Same. When I read her statements at the hearing yesterday, I wondered if maybe she had just graduated from law school last month. It reminded me of first year of law school and trying to crack one of those crazy hypotheticals professors would throw at us. |
The law won’t change unless there is enough $$ to build/staff facilities. And there isn’t. That’s the point. |
I hope everyone understands that these people are messing with you. They are parodying the light-on-crime current culture in DC. And I guess it’s working because you’re falling for it. |
I had a family member taken into a an ER on psych watch —- two different hospitals and they both had someone stationed at her door to watch. That’s standard protocol for psych admits. Possible she overpowered that person — they aren’t cops, just staffers. But they do typically assign one on one observation for psych cases. And my family member was just a little depressed—not “acting crazy” like this. |
Do we know if the carjacker was a psych admit? |
But per reports, the specific reason this person was brought to the ER was her vital signs, not their mental state. Yes, the parents called because they were concerned that the person was not acting right, but the decision to bring to the ER was specific to her heart rate and blood pressure. Simply "not acting right" wouldn't qualify for an FD-12/involuntary hold. |
|
This strikes me as a little different than drunk driving. If she was given a drug and had an adverse reaction….that’s different than choosing to drink and drive. I had a family member have an adverse reaction to an meds for dental surgery — they suddenly were trying to jump out of a moving car and hit someone. The nicest person—it was just a weird drug reaction made them suddenly manically depressive and paranoid.
I hope they gave her an immediate tox screen so we can know if the “given a weird drug” story has any basis. She may have gotten weed that was heavily laced with fetanyl, unknown to her, and it induced psychosis. |
The “I” in DUI stands for intoxicated. Doesn’t matter if it’s from drugs (including prescription drugs) or alcohol. My understanding is that DUI does include an intent standard, but normally it’s about intent to drive a vehicle not intent to get intoxicated. I would presume that if you were unintentionally intoxicated, for example roofied, the law wouldn’t necessarily save you but prosecutorial discretion would, considering that your intoxicated state was the result of you being a victim of a separate crime. Intentionally ingesting drugs then driving is DUI all day long. Even if you didn’t know what drugs you were ingesting. |
I don't even think she'd been admitted yet. From the sounds of the court documents that were released, she and the woman who died just had the misfortune of arriving at the ER at the same time. It does not sound like a mental health crisis, it sounds like she took bad drugs. She should absolutely be in jail for carjacking - drugs are no excuse. Unfortunately I have no faith in the DC courts to bother if it was just carjacking. However, the court documents also make it sound like the woman who died was mid-heart attack or stroke en route to the ER entrance. So it will be very, very difficult to prove that Kayla killed her. I certainly don't think she died in the crash - if she died, why wasn't Kayla seriously injured? |
I thought DUI meant Driving Under the Influence |
The airbags deployed in the crash, indicating that it was at some speed. The high 22 year old walked away from the crash while the ill 55 year old died. That doesn't indicate that the crash was minor, it indicates that being young and high gives you better odds of surviving a crash. |
Got it, thanks for clarifying |