MCPS principal allegedly assaulted student at Ritchie Park

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:https://www.facebook.com/100064839515023/posts/pfbid02PzPLEBjej9urnvWUBf7HWUNe1kngsFYX9ChCvGmf4iXmk7FgSGeiCa6Qu6AEMi57l/?app=fbl

Wtf??


Well here comes another settlement. Time to lay off another 5 teachers to pay off a settlement for an incompetent administrator.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:https://www.facebook.com/100064839515023/posts/pfbid02PzPLEBjej9urnvWUBf7HWUNe1kngsFYX9ChCvGmf4iXmk7FgSGeiCa6Qu6AEMi57l/?app=fbl

Wtf??


Well here comes another settlement. Time to lay off another 5 teachers to pay off a settlement for an incompetent administrator.



The courts generally do not award much in damages in these cases
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:This entire situation just makes me sad for everyone involved (and for many of the comments on this thread).

I know this principal and had many lo conversations with him when my child was at Barnsley. I am not specifically a fan or a critic, just experienced him as someone trying to do his job. I didn't always agree with his takes and would say he had an unrealistic expectation that kids would have positive behaviors and compliance at all times, which is just not realistic. But he could also be reasoned with.

Whatever happened I can say he didn't have a record of physical interactions with children so I can imagine he lost his temper and now is paying the consequences. That is something I can imagine happening to many people.

I am sad for the kid who experienced that from a trusted adult, for the kids who were witnesses, and for that school community.

It's just all so unfortunate.


This seems like the right take.

I wonder what MCPS has been doing this whole time. Four months is plenty of time for the school to come to some agreement with the family. And I don't mean a monetary settlement-- I doubt there is much in the way of damages here-- but more from a disciplinary side.

Did MCPS refuse to do anything other than admin leave? Did the union prevent them from doing anything? Did the parents demand something unreasonable?

I'm pretty sympathetic all-around here. I have a child with special needs and significant behavioral issues. I worry about these kind of things happening to him. But I also know how challenging he is to deal with, and I think I'd be pretty forgiving if I thought someone was generally well-intentioned but made a mistake under challenging circumstances.

I wouldn't find physical handling or even a foot stomp to be unforgivable if the person otherwise had treated my child well.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:This entire situation just makes me sad for everyone involved (and for many of the comments on this thread).

I know this principal and had many conversations with him when my child was at Barnsley. I am not specifically a fan or a critic, just experienced him as someone trying to do his job. I didn't always agree with his takes and would say he had an unrealistic expectation that kids would have positive behaviors and compliance at all times, which is just not realistic. But he could also be reasoned with.

Whatever happened I can say he didn't have a record of physical interactions with children so I can imagine he lost his temper and now is paying the consequences. That is something I can imagine happening to many people.

I am sad for the kid who experienced that from a trusted adult, for the kids who were witnesses, and for that school community.

It's just all so unfortunate.


He was my kid’s principal at Barnsley and I feel pretty similar to this.
Anonymous
Same. It’s just a sad situation.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Same. It’s just a sad situation.


My kids had him at Barnsley too! He was intense but my kids really loved him. Thought he was funny and did silly things to motivate the kids. He could be loud but he always meant well.

I do wonder if we really know the whole story. While I agree all kids need to be safe the consequences seem a lot. Like MCPS didn’t do enough with Beidleman and now doing so much more, perhaps too much? I don’t know but it’s all very sad.
Anonymous
If I had to guess I bet the parent was definitely not satisfied with how mcps handled this and probably wasn’t satisfied with how their child was being managed by the school all along. This child was very small- in kindergarten. There is no excuse for such ill treatment of a five year old and that parent has every right to push consequences if that’s what happened
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Same. It’s just a sad situation.


My kids had him at Barnsley too! He was intense but my kids really loved him. Thought he was funny and did silly things to motivate the kids. He could be loud but he always meant well.

I do wonder if we really know the whole story. While I agree all kids need to be safe the consequences seem a lot. Like MCPS didn’t do enough with Beidleman and now doing so much more, perhaps too much? I don’t know but it’s all very sad.


You think the consequences for intentionally stomping on someone else’s body part (a minor child’s body part) are too great in this situation? You are delusional and if this were your precious child you’d be singing a different song
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Same. It’s just a sad situation.


My kids had him at Barnsley too! He was intense but my kids really loved him. Thought he was funny and did silly things to motivate the kids. He could be loud but he always meant well.

I do wonder if we really know the whole story. While I agree all kids need to be safe the consequences seem a lot. Like MCPS didn’t do enough with Beidleman and now doing so much more, perhaps too much? I don’t know but it’s all very sad.


You think the consequences for intentionally stomping on someone else’s body part (a minor child’s body part) are too great in this situation? You are delusional and if this were your precious child you’d be singing a different song


How do we know it was intentional? I don’t see from the charging document that intent is mentioned nor proven.
Anonymous
What is everyone at RP saying? Why are only the Barnsley parents on here.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Same. It’s just a sad situation.


My kids had him at Barnsley too! He was intense but my kids really loved him. Thought he was funny and did silly things to motivate the kids. He could be loud but he always meant well.

I do wonder if we really know the whole story. While I agree all kids need to be safe the consequences seem a lot. Like MCPS didn’t do enough with Beidleman and now doing so much more, perhaps too much? I don’t know but it’s all very sad.


You think the consequences for intentionally stomping on someone else’s body part (a minor child’s body part) are too great in this situation? You are delusional and if this were your precious child you’d be singing a different song


How do we know it was intentional? I don’t see from the charging document that intent is mentioned nor proven.



Are you that dumb or just that loyal to this person? The intent was enough to get him arrested. The police do not arrest you based on nothing, no matter what conspiracy theorists may say
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:https://www.facebook.com/100064839515023/posts/pfbid02PzPLEBjej9urnvWUBf7HWUNe1kngsFYX9ChCvGmf4iXmk7FgSGeiCa6Qu6AEMi57l/?app=fbl

Wtf??


Well here comes another settlement. Time to lay off another 5 teachers to pay off a settlement for an incompetent administrator.



The courts generally do not award much in damages in these cases


It’s the cost of hiring lawyers and all of the fees associated with it that is problematic for the county. Just another example of rising costs
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:https://www.facebook.com/100064839515023/posts/pfbid02PzPLEBjej9urnvWUBf7HWUNe1kngsFYX9ChCvGmf4iXmk7FgSGeiCa6Qu6AEMi57l/?app=fbl

Wtf??


Well here comes another settlement. Time to lay off another 5 teachers to pay off a settlement for an incompetent administrator.



The courts generally do not award much in damages in these cases


Especially when there are no actual witnesses just anonymous complaints.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Same. It’s just a sad situation.


My kids had him at Barnsley too! He was intense but my kids really loved him. Thought he was funny and did silly things to motivate the kids. He could be loud but he always meant well.

I do wonder if we really know the whole story. While I agree all kids need to be safe the consequences seem a lot. Like MCPS didn’t do enough with Beidleman and now doing so much more, perhaps too much? I don’t know but it’s all very sad.


Can you clarify or explain "intense"? Or give a couple of examples? I guess my kids never had an intense principal. It doesn't sound good to me, but it could be I just don't understand the dynamic.
Anonymous
The legal department will soon be the largest department in MCPS at this rate. Let’s cut teachers and hire more highly paid lawyers
post reply Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: