Happy affair stories

Anonymous
Absolutely not. It's disgusting to tell the other spouse. There's a very good chance he wouldn't want to know. I wouldn't want some btch getting in my business if my DH stepped out. If it was over and he's not running away with her, you just seem completely psychotic. It's not "doing the right thing", it's bringing everyone else down with you. Just stay out of it.
[/quote

Okay, cheater - go away now. The adults are having a discussion.
Anonymous
Except it is. Two wrongs don’t make a right. That’s like saying “you must exert control and hurt other people because you were hurt.” Black and white thinking has no place in real relationships. If you were screwing my DH, please don’t tell me.


Except it's NOT WRONG for someone to tell the truth - and in this case, it's absolutely the compassionate, honorable thing to do. You clearly lack integrity and a moral compass, but fortunately, many people don't.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Hi OP, yes. I had an affair for 7 and a half years. Not discovered by his wife nor my husband. AP and I are still friends, and we're each still with our spouses. I am now faithful to my husband. Affair got us both through rough times. So glad I didn't divorce. Good luck!


It could still come out. You were one person in a two person affair. Friend accidentally discovered her DH ONS, one thing lead to another and she also uncovered long affair he had with a “friend”. He doesn’t know she knows and she is planning to inform AP husband with proof but is giving it time. I’m trying to talk her out of it since it won’t improve her own situation and there are others involved she would hurt. At least all the kids are grown but now I have anxiety over this! Also I’m not sure you considering yourself faithful now really counts.


People are individuals. It always amuses me when people try to shame a betrayed spouse into keeping their secrets. I mean, if you didn't want your spouse to know you are a cheater, I guess you shouldn't cheat. But, to then shame and belittle a person that was a victim of this from sharing this almost decade long affair as if she's the bad person in this scenario is just absurd. She will do what she needs to do for closure. And a person that was banging her husband for 7 years really doesn't matter to her, just like she didn't matter to the ap.


I’m not trying to shame her. I try to be a sounding board mainly. I see that it has destroyed her and she may elect to bring this upon another person. Will the revenge really be sweet or will she feel worse when it’s done. I’m concerned about her.


DP. I will say it feels really, really good to get that off your chest. No more feeling like a victim. Done and dusted.

Absolutely not. It's disgusting to tell the other spouse. There's a very good chance he wouldn't want to know. I wouldn't want some btch getting in my business if my DH stepped out. If it was over and he's not running away with her, you just seem completely psychotic. It's not "doing the right thing", it's bringing everyone else down with you. Just stay out of it.


This is some weird "blame the messenger" energy. The people who are disgusting and getting into other people's business are the ones pretending they're being monogamous to their partners when they're not. Being told the truth so you can reclaim your autonomy is a necessary step to begin righting all the wrongs the cheaters foisted onto their betrayed partners. Don't distract from the real issues by claiming that telling the truth is bad thing here.

Except it is. Two wrongs don’t make a right. That’s like saying “you must exert control and hurt other people because you were hurt.” Black and white thinking has no place in real relationships. If you were screwing my DH, please don’t tell me.


There is only one wrong: the cheating/adultery.

Truth is not a wrong. Communicating info so someone knows to protect their health is a “good”.

It’s pathetic when cheaters try to equate ratting on them as an offense and on the same level of equivalency as screwing and lying for years behind their spouses’ backs.







It definitely seems odd to be so mad at the idea of betrayed spouses telling other betrayed spouses but not other elements of the story like, you know, the actual betrayal . . . Basically the betrayed spouse has already been mistreated in a huge way and now the cheater is trying to guilt the BS into keeping their dirty secret so they don't have to deal with the natural consequences of their own choices. "Please keep eating my shlt sandwich because it wouldn't be fair for me to have people know that I did the thing that I knowingly chose to do, and if you do tell then it must be that you are manipulative/controlling/petty . . ." Um, what. If you don't want people to know that you did the thing, don't DO THE THING.
Anonymous
You don’t get to unilaterally destroy someone else’s family in the name of “the truth”.

There is nuance to life and love and truth. There is no one truth. Cheating is wrong, but good people don’t try to take down as many people as possible with them once they learn they are doomed. If any of you were faced with the actual truth every day of your lives, you would have a mental breakdown.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Except it is. Two wrongs don’t make a right. That’s like saying “you must exert control and hurt other people because you were hurt.” Black and white thinking has no place in real relationships. If you were screwing my DH, please don’t tell me.


Except it's NOT WRONG for someone to tell the truth - and in this case, it's absolutely the compassionate, honorable thing to do. You clearly lack integrity and a moral compass, but fortunately, many people don't.

Would you look a 6 year old in the face and tell her that the truth is more important than her family staying intact? Is that compassionate? “But sweetheart, don’t you see? My husband doesn’t want me so now I will destroy your mothers family as revenge. It’s for the best, darling.”
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Except it is. Two wrongs don’t make a right. That’s like saying “you must exert control and hurt other people because you were hurt.” Black and white thinking has no place in real relationships. If you were screwing my DH, please don’t tell me.


Except it's NOT WRONG for someone to tell the truth - and in this case, it's absolutely the compassionate, honorable thing to do. You clearly lack integrity and a moral compass, but fortunately, many people don't.

Would you look a 6 year old in the face and tell her that the truth is more important than her family staying intact? Is that compassionate? “But sweetheart, don’t you see? My husband doesn’t want me so now I will destroy your mothers family as revenge. It’s for the best, darling.”


It's not relaying the message that the destroys the marriage. It's the content of the message. "Don't shoot the messenger" is a common refrain because people try to pull this logical fallacy all the time to shift blame. Do you teach your kids "Don't do things that you don't want other people to know about?" or do you teach them "Do whatever the hell you want, and then if someone finds out, threaten/manipulate/blackmail them so they don't squeal"? If it's the latter, then you're in the mob.

The majority of couples stay together after infidelity is discovered anyway. The only relationships that usually die when affairs are exposed are affairs themselves.

It's super anti-women to imply that men can cheat all they want, and if women don't sacrifice their own well-being in order to protect the cheater from the natural consequences of his choices, then it's "revenge." It's not revenge; it's just not being a door mat/human shield.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Except it is. Two wrongs don’t make a right. That’s like saying “you must exert control and hurt other people because you were hurt.” Black and white thinking has no place in real relationships. If you were screwing my DH, please don’t tell me.


Except it's NOT WRONG for someone to tell the truth - and in this case, it's absolutely the compassionate, honorable thing to do. You clearly lack integrity and a moral compass, but fortunately, many people don't.

Would you look a 6 year old in the face and tell her that the truth is more important than her family staying intact? Is that compassionate? “But sweetheart, don’t you see? My husband doesn’t want me so now I will destroy your mothers family as revenge. It’s for the best, darling.”


How about look at the 6-year old and say: “mommy is a whore who can’t keep her legs closed and banged other women’s husbands behind daddy’s back. Go yell at that lady over there whose husband she was banging for years. It’s all her fault that I don’t want to be married to her anymore.”
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Except it is. Two wrongs don’t make a right. That’s like saying “you must exert control and hurt other people because you were hurt.” Black and white thinking has no place in real relationships. If you were screwing my DH, please don’t tell me.


Except it's NOT WRONG for someone to tell the truth - and in this case, it's absolutely the compassionate, honorable thing to do. You clearly lack integrity and a moral compass, but fortunately, many people don't.

Would you look a 6 year old in the face and tell her that the truth is more important than her family staying intact? Is that compassionate? “But sweetheart, don’t you see? My husband doesn’t want me so now I will destroy your mothers family as revenge. It’s for the best, darling.”


It's not relaying the message that the destroys the marriage. It's the content of the message. "Don't shoot the messenger" is a common refrain because people try to pull this logical fallacy all the time to shift blame. Do you teach your kids "Don't do things that you don't want other people to know about?" or do you teach them "Do whatever the hell you want, and then if someone finds out, threaten/manipulate/blackmail them so they don't squeal"? If it's the latter, then you're in the mob.

The majority of couples stay together after infidelity is discovered anyway. The only relationships that usually die when affairs are exposed are affairs themselves.

It's super anti-women to imply that men can cheat all they want, and if women don't sacrifice their own well-being in order to protect the cheater from the natural consequences of his choices, then it's "revenge." It's not revenge; it's just not being a door mat/human shield.


+100
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Except it is. Two wrongs don’t make a right. That’s like saying “you must exert control and hurt other people because you were hurt.” Black and white thinking has no place in real relationships. If you were screwing my DH, please don’t tell me.


Except it's NOT WRONG for someone to tell the truth - and in this case, it's absolutely the compassionate, honorable thing to do. You clearly lack integrity and a moral compass, but fortunately, many people don't.

Would you look a 6 year old in the face and tell her that the truth is more important than her family staying intact? Is that compassionate? “But sweetheart, don’t you see? My husband doesn’t want me so now I will destroy your mothers family as revenge. It’s for the best, darling.”


How compassionate is having sex with another married mother’s husband? Is that compassion for your spouse and kids, much less hers? Why do only you matter in this scenario?

Once you cheat, nobody needs to protect you and lie for you. What are you going to tell YOUR AP’s 6-year old? Or the 13 year old that intercepted your nasty cooter photos on dad’s phone?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:You don’t get to unilaterally destroy someone else’s family in the name of “the truth”.

There is nuance to life and love and truth. There is no one truth. Cheating is wrong, but good people don’t try to take down as many people as possible with them once they learn they are doomed. If any of you were faced with the actual truth every day of your lives, you would have a mental breakdown.


Good people don’t cheat. Period. They don’t put people in these situations. Period.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Except it is. Two wrongs don’t make a right. That’s like saying “you must exert control and hurt other people because you were hurt.” Black and white thinking has no place in real relationships. If you were screwing my DH, please don’t tell me.


Except it's NOT WRONG for someone to tell the truth - and in this case, it's absolutely the compassionate, honorable thing to do. You clearly lack integrity and a moral compass, but fortunately, many people don't.

Would you look a 6 year old in the face and tell her that the truth is more important than her family staying intact? Is that compassionate? “But sweetheart, don’t you see? My husband doesn’t want me so now I will destroy your mothers family as revenge. It’s for the best, darling.”


How compassionate is having sex with another married mother’s husband? Is that compassion for your spouse and kids, much less hers? Why do only you matter in this scenario?

Once you cheat, nobody needs to protect you and lie for you. What are you going to tell YOUR AP’s 6-year old? Or the 13 year old that intercepted your nasty cooter photos on dad’s phone?


Yeah she’s okay with ruining someone else’s family, but hers is off limits. Who cares about his kids and wife, they can suffer and have their family fall apart—everyone must protect Princess slutcakes though. Delusional.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Except it is. Two wrongs don’t make a right. That’s like saying “you must exert control and hurt other people because you were hurt.” Black and white thinking has no place in real relationships. If you were screwing my DH, please don’t tell me.


Except it's NOT WRONG for someone to tell the truth - and in this case, it's absolutely the compassionate, honorable thing to do. You clearly lack integrity and a moral compass, but fortunately, many people don't.

Would you look a 6 year old in the face and tell her that the truth is more important than her family staying intact? Is that compassionate? “But sweetheart, don’t you see? My husband doesn’t want me so now I will destroy your mothers family as revenge. It’s for the best, darling.”


Nobody is talking to a 6-year old crazy. Just the adults. You know like the two adults that had private sex and texts and calls. It’s going to be kept from the kids too. It will be up to the spouse whether he still wants your ho @ss, and if not you can tell your own kids why.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:You don’t get to unilaterally destroy someone else’s family in the name of “the truth”.

There is nuance to life and love and truth. There is no one truth. Cheating is wrong, but good people don’t try to take down as many people as possible with them once they learn they are doomed. If any of you were faced with the actual truth every day of your lives, you would have a mental breakdown.


So it’s better to destroy somebody’s family in the name of getting railed? Your logic is so entirely screwed up. Mental gymnastics 4.0.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m in a dead bedroom situation and am dying! Any good or positive affair stories?
I’ve got enough of the negative, it’s deterred me for years. I’m hanging on by a thread.


Have some class and just get out of the marriage.


+ 1,000

You are basically asking people to send in biased posts so you can justify the wrong thing you want to do.

Man up and be a responsible husband/father or get out of the marriage.

The alternative is pure slime.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I didn’t have an affair.

But after the kids, my wife let it be known she was not interested in sex but wanted to stay married. I make a lot of money and she implied I could spend some to get a bj every now and again. (Zero interest in that)

But I slept around when traveling from 35-45 and at some point my libido matched my wife’s again. The last 10 years have been nice.


My situation was similar. Honestly, especially for men, the crazy libido years last until mid-40s then for many men, your sex drive comes down to a "normal" level where you aren't sex obsessed and you can deal with having a drive mismatch of one a week or less. I think many couples would do themselves well to stay married and sane by outsourcing if necessary and see where you are by age 45-50. You could probably live out the rest of your lives happily if you don't get caught.


You have no idea how many women are married to low libido men. My DH has a low sex drive and his drinking doesn’t help it. I’m 40 and would like to have sex multiple times a week if possible.


I’m a 41 y/o male who’s wife has zero libido, reading this thread, thinking “damn there’s got to be married women out there who are in the same boat.”
I’ll sleep better knowing there are female counterparts out there lol.
post reply Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: