Ch Ch MD - prettiest dream house I've seen in years

Anonymous
$4m for a stucco barn. Awful choice of materials on the exterior. They used the cheapest sh#t they could find.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Ok, I am in disbelief that so many people hate on this house and staging. I am not commenting on the price of this home. While it may not be everyone's taste, it is simple, yet luxurious, timeless and classy. Staging is meant to be a play on a prospective buyer's imagination. If you don't have one, it may seem uninspired, cold or strange.

Monochromatic style of decorating is not the latest fad. It is timeless and white/grey/wood/brown combo with lots of textures and mixed metals will outlast any color trends. It seems that most DCUM visitors like cookie cutter Ballard Designs with colors, patterns, everything matching and lots of junk and clutter. This one is not. It is understated. It withholds clutter. It also has a character, just different than what most of ya'll are used to.


Hey, we found the guy who got out of the straight jacket!

Nice white ball collection, buddy. Can you get me some sponge candy from Wegmans? It's so delicious, and they have it in bulk.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Very pretty, but did they do the pictures in black and white or is that house actually monocromatic?


Photos are in color. OP here: I find it so interesting how negative vast majority of opinions are here. While I think maybe the actual 'warmth' of place doesn't carry over in photos the comments also suggest that many/most would have preferred the traditional Georgian-inspired house right around the corner-with warm wood and all the moldings and classic detailing that I find so oppressive/dated (https://www.homesale.com/p/5214-Oakland-Rd-Chevy-Chase-MD-20815/dmgid_117921679#&gid=1&pid=8) I guess the good thing is if majority don't like I may have a few days to win lottery and buy it before it sells. Looks like my competition will be minimal.


I love this house. Feels very homely to me
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Very pretty, but did they do the pictures in black and white or is that house actually monocromatic?


Photos are in color. OP here: I find it so interesting how negative vast majority of opinions are here. While I think maybe the actual 'warmth' of place doesn't carry over in photos the comments also suggest that many/most would have preferred the traditional Georgian-inspired house right around the corner-with warm wood and all the moldings and classic detailing that I find so oppressive/dated (https://www.homesale.com/p/5214-Oakland-Rd-Chevy-Chase-MD-20815/dmgid_117921679#&gid=1&pid=8) I guess the good thing is if majority don't like I may have a few days to win lottery and buy it before it sells. Looks like my competition will be minimal.


I love this house. Feels very homely to me

Me too! I don’t like the original house, but this one is much closer to “dream house” in my mind.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Very pretty, but did they do the pictures in black and white or is that house actually monocromatic?


Photos are in color. OP here: I find it so interesting how negative vast majority of opinions are here. While I think maybe the actual 'warmth' of place doesn't carry over in photos the comments also suggest that many/most would have preferred the traditional Georgian-inspired house right around the corner-with warm wood and all the moldings and classic detailing that I find so oppressive/dated (https://www.homesale.com/p/5214-Oakland-Rd-Chevy-Chase-MD-20815/dmgid_117921679#&gid=1&pid=8) I guess the good thing is if majority don't like I may have a few days to win lottery and buy it before it sells. Looks like my competition will be minimal.


I love this house. Feels very homely to me

Me too! I don’t like the original house, but this one is much closer to “dream house” in my mind.


+1. I may not agree with all the color choices but they do give the home some depth and personality. I usually love a monochromatic color scheme but that is when it is done with layers of tones and textures which the "dream' home does not have. A monochromatic palette should be very soothing and restful, not stark and severe, IMO.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don't have anywhere near this kind of money, so maybe my opinion doesn't matter, but there has GOT to be something with character for this kind of money.

I just kept thinking that this doesn't look like a $4m house. It just looks like a $750K house that got put in the "make it big" machine. It has none of the characteristics that I would expect at that price point except sheer size.


There are other houses on the market in Kenwood have tons of character. You know, the original houses with yes, slate roofs.

https://www.redfin.com/MD/Chevy-Chase/6600-Kennedy-Dr-20815/home/10688266
http://www.ttrsir.com/eng/sales/detail/279-l-559-e7sjzq/6205-kennedy-dr-chevy-chase-md-20815

Besides the decorating extremes, pretty details like medallions, oval windows, gorgeous yards, no reminders to go to Wegmans...
Was this one a tear down? Does anyone know if what was there before was an original Kenwood house or just something to be torn down...


Yes, this was a teardown, new foundations and the whole deal. It's been in the works for 2-3 years.

While the other Kenwood houses might be better, for $6M or $3.2M I would not want to be stuck in Kenwood. Obviously, others feel differently.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don't have anywhere near this kind of money, so maybe my opinion doesn't matter, but there has GOT to be something with character for this kind of money.

I just kept thinking that this doesn't look like a $4m house. It just looks like a $750K house that got put in the "make it big" machine. It has none of the characteristics that I would expect at that price point except sheer size.


There are other houses on the market in Kenwood have tons of character. You know, the original houses with yes, slate roofs.

https://www.redfin.com/MD/Chevy-Chase/6600-Kennedy-Dr-20815/home/10688266
http://www.ttrsir.com/eng/sales/detail/279-l-559-e7sjzq/6205-kennedy-dr-chevy-chase-md-20815

Besides the decorating extremes, pretty details like medallions, oval windows, gorgeous yards, no reminders to go to Wegmans...
Was this one a tear down? Does anyone know if what was there before was an original Kenwood house or just something to be torn down...


Yes, this was a teardown, new foundations and the whole deal. It's been in the works for 2-3 years.

While the other Kenwood houses might be better, for $6M or $3.2M I would not want to be stuck in Kenwood. Obviously, others feel differently.


I F*CKING LOVE SKIRTED ROUND TABLES IN THE DRAPERY FABRIC
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don't have anywhere near this kind of money, so maybe my opinion doesn't matter, but there has GOT to be something with character for this kind of money.

I just kept thinking that this doesn't look like a $4m house. It just looks like a $750K house that got put in the "make it big" machine. It has none of the characteristics that I would expect at that price point except sheer size.


There are other houses on the market in Kenwood have tons of character. You know, the original houses with yes, slate roofs.

https://www.redfin.com/MD/Chevy-Chase/6600-Kennedy-Dr-20815/home/10688266
http://www.ttrsir.com/eng/sales/detail/279-l-559-e7sjzq/6205-kennedy-dr-chevy-chase-md-20815

Besides the decorating extremes, pretty details like medallions, oval windows, gorgeous yards, no reminders to go to Wegmans...
Was this one a tear down? Does anyone know if what was there before was an original Kenwood house or just something to be torn down...


Yes, this was a teardown, new foundations and the whole deal. It's been in the works for 2-3 years.

While the other Kenwood houses might be better, for $6M or $3.2M I would not want to be stuck in Kenwood. Obviously, others feel differently.


I F*CKING LOVE SKIRTED ROUND TABLES IN THE DRAPERY FABRIC


I also love the baskets in shelves above the range in the other house. They say, "not only do I not cook for myself or clean my own home, I have NEVER cooked or cleaned."
Anonymous
As many have noted, so much is cheap/builder grade. Subway tile that doesn’t bother to go to the top of the wall. Subway tile generally (I don’t believe for a second that this is “expensive” subway tile, as someone noted, given that they used it in every freaking room, for one). Cheap closet fittings. Flooring suspect. No slate roof.

Hence my bottom-line problem with this house: If you see cheap tile, cheap shelves, cheap floor, cheap roof, etc., you don’t want to know what’s behind the walls. In the utlitiy room. In the HVAC. In the plumbing. In the structural support. In the attic. In the insulation. This type of cheaping out happens in this price range all the time. A builder swoops in, does a tear down, paints everything white and gray and neutral and trendy, and the unsuspecting buyer ends up with massive structural problems. Or mold. Or shoddy windows. Or energy inefficiency. Or all of the above. The builders just move on.

Also, I know the whole thing is white and gray, necessitating dark mullions in the windows, but are we done with dark mullions yet? In a few houses they work and add depth. In others, they just look dark and dated. Am I the only one who generally hates this “trend”?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I don't like the exterior at all. I agree that the interior is very antiseptic and cold.


Same. Would never consider this house in a million years.
Anonymous
one thing I will say: American women in general have a very poor taste in clothes and in most other things. I bet most of you would lounge around in your fancy yoga pants on those hideous sofas in floral Calico fabrics, blue and other teal carpets and dusty rose drapery. Yuck.

The decorator that staged this house was brilliant, especially when he put that straight jacket in the basement to scare off all the stepford wives with no style.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:one thing I will say: American women in general have a very poor taste in clothes and in most other things. I bet most of you would lounge around in your fancy yoga pants on those hideous sofas in floral Calico fabrics, blue and other teal carpets and dusty rose drapery. Yuck.

The decorator that staged this house was brilliant, especially when he put that straight jacket in the basement to scare off all the stepford wives with no style.


I don't know a single person in Dc who uses dusty rose, teal, or calico. Did someone in this thread suggest that we copy the color scheme of a hospital wing? If you like this cheap attempt at gustavian minimalism, go buy it. The bones are cheap. I didn't realize that acknowledging this revealed our terrible American taste. I'll go put on my yoga pants now.
Anonymous
No wall cabinets in the kitchen? Did I miss something?
This is beyond cheap.
Anonymous
Let's find out who the sucker will be to pay more than 1.5m in this house.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:one thing I will say: American women in general have a very poor taste in clothes and in most other things. I bet most of you would lounge around in your fancy yoga pants on those hideous sofas in floral Calico fabrics, blue and other teal carpets and dusty rose drapery. Yuck.

The decorator that staged this house was brilliant, especially when he put that straight jacket in the basement to scare off all the stepford wives with no style.


Who builds a house in Kenwood with the intent of scaring off Stepford wives? Have you been to Kenwood? Do you have any clue what the prescribed style in Kenwood is?
post reply Forum Index » Real Estate
Message Quick Reply
Go to: