Ok you all know some men who are thrilled to be a SAHP and not work. That is not the norm. |
This is same poster back. I revise the wording. Not having worked in 25 years is not never working. I agree. I do think most men don't want to say at the age of 55-60 they haven't worked in 25 years. |
PP explains it with the "privilege of choice." Other women can't afford to go down this path of seeking clarity. They simply must bring in that paycheck. Or they do have that clarity that they're meant to not work, but have to keep their job anyway. |
A SAHP is not the norm but still an option for families today with the resources. |
+1 I know a lot of guys in their 30s who are good with this. It's not the norm yet, but it's fairly common and not looked down upon. Most guys their age are jealous of how they got such a sweet deal. |
+2 DH's nephew is engaged to an Apple attorney. He has been self-employed doing freelance software projects since they graduated from college. They are planning on having several kids and he is fine with being the SAHP to make it possible for his wife to bring in the big bucks. |
Not the PP, but yes, I think it's much more difficult to make that decision if the other spouse does not make enough to support your current lifestyle or have the potential to easily grow into a job with that pay level. I'm sure there are plenty of women(and men) making $50K/year who would love to be SAHP but cannot justify dropping the family income from $100K to only $50K (or the equivalent). It's definately easier to make that choice when your partner makes good money and has the potential to continue doing so |
So if you are making $400K, then you are taking home $260K (after fed and state taxes and FICA). Add in $20K for each spouse for 401K and another $6.5K each for IRA---that's $53K reduction. If you have 2 Kids, then take away $25K/year for college savings (at a minimum)--this might pay for in-state for 4 years for each kid. So now I have only paid taxes, saved for retirement and college (the bare minimum) and I have $182K remaining for everything else. My monthly mortgage on a million dollar home will be $6K+ for mortgage, insurance, prop taxes ($72K). Health insurance plus medical co-pays/fees per month will easily be $1K, and the kids are not even old enough for braces. Add in vehicle insurance, costs for cars, etc... Then I've got food, clothing, etc. Oh and perhaps we need to fly to see family once per year in the USA. So sure, I technically could afford to pay business class for a trip to Europe for my family of 4, but that would be $4K/person vs $1.2K/person. So $16K vs 4.8K. I will be flying economy and using the difference to help pay for the rest of the vacation. |
I don’t think she’s a troll so much as a humble braggart. Or bored and making up things to feel good about herself for. Anyone else out there as wealthy and fabulous as my family that can relate? We make between $1M-$4M a year and I’m like, soooo worried we don’t have enough for me to do what I really wanna do, which is just take a break!! We get it. You out-married all the girls who were mean to you in your small town Ohio high school. |
I had clarity that I wanted to stay at home. I'm glad I followed that instinct. I could see how people's lives get too crazy and busy once they have kids. And the whole family life seemed much too hectic. I am a workaholic so I knew that cutting back at work wasn't going to be something I was good at. My mother was also a workaholic and we barely had any attention from her. I didn't want to go in that direction. I am grateful that it's kept my family out of the lifestyle creep (spending lots of money on crap that will clutter up our landfills and oceans). We just don't have the cash to spend, so we don't. We do save plenty, though. The only regret I have is wondering what I could have done in my career, but my career was quite advanced when I left it behind, so I'm not really regretful there. |
| I stayed home until my kids started school. I loved being there with them. We struggled financially when I was home but it was worth it to us. We have no long term financial regrets. Do what is best for you and your family, whatever that is. |
+2 I SAH for three years after my first was born - I was miserable. I now have three kids and am happy to work FT. Different things work for different people. I have seen absolutely brilliant SAHMs and envy their creativity and organization. But it just wasn’t for me. |
|
No, not for a minute. If I had been working, I never would have seen my kids.
Now that I'm back at work FT though I'm in savings overdrive. |
-2 I do not know one woman who’d be happy with this. |
Such a crap answer. It’s okay for your husband not to have seen the kids though, right? |