How is the Supreme Court confirmation going to go?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When the controlling party breaks its own rules, then the nominee is illegitimate

Perhaps the Democrats should show up for meetings instead of walking out like children.

Absolutely, can't wait for the bodies of black and brown women to start piling up in the morgues. Poor women dying of lack of reproductive health care is our favorite torture porn.

Well, if you "can't wait," then who is the real sicko?

Are you so unfamiliar with vernacular English such that you don’t understand PP’s sarcasm? That if the dark vision the Christo-fascists want for our country comes to pass that women will be maimed and will die? Do you understand that making abortion illegal doesn’t stop abortion, it just kills women.

DP. Abortion will never be illegal again in this country. But morons like you are exactly why millions are voting against Democrats.

Legality doesn’t matter if they aren’t accessible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When the controlling party breaks its own rules, then the nominee is illegitimate

Perhaps the Democrats should show up for meetings instead of walking out like children.

Absolutely, can't wait for the bodies of black and brown women to start piling up in the morgues. Poor women dying of lack of reproductive health care is our favorite torture porn.

Well, if you "can't wait," then who is the real sicko?

Are you so unfamiliar with vernacular English such that you don’t understand PP’s sarcasm? That if the dark vision the Christo-fascists want for our country comes to pass that women will be maimed and will die? Do you understand that making abortion illegal doesn’t stop abortion, it just kills women.

DP. Abortion will never be illegal again in this country. But morons like you are exactly why millions are voting against Democrats.

You understand very little about the legal process - I’m guessing Fox News School of Law? Roe won’t be overturned, but every single restriction on abortion will be upheld. States will be allowed to institute outright bans. Alabama will be allowed to make it a crime for someone to go out of state for reproductive health care. Poor women will die - this will make you super happy. Your sister will die because she will have an ectopic pregnancy and won’t be able to get a D&C - this will make you sad (one hopes). You will be able to adopt white babies - this will make you happy. Lots of poor black snd brown babies will rot in foster care or be abused by teen parents, you will give exactly zero effs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was an illegal appointment. Everyone knows you cannot appoint a justice in the last year of a President's term. She should be impeached and removed. If that's not possible, they should make the Supreme Court 1000000 justices. all Democrats except for 6 because that's where our democracy is headed.

Please show us where it states the bolded in the Constitution, or anywhere else. You do realize justices have been appointed in the last year of a President’s term before, right? So we’ll wait while you back up your ludicrous claim.

Merrick Fcking Garland.

[Anonymous]

Roe will be gone by next summer

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mississippi-15-week-abortion-ban-supreme-court-review-request/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was an illegal appointment. Everyone knows you cannot appoint a justice in the last year of a President's term. She should be impeached and removed. If that's not possible, they should make the Supreme Court 1000000 justices. all Democrats except for 6 because that's where our democracy is headed.

Please show us where it states the bolded in the Constitution, or anywhere else. You do realize justices have been appointed in the last year of a President’s term before, right? So we’ll wait while you back up your ludicrous claim.

Please show us where it states in the Constitution that anything PP said is wrong. You do realize that if enough Congressmembers and the President do something ludicrous, it becomes law, and this actually happens more than anyone would like.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When the controlling party breaks its own rules, then the nominee is illegitimate

Perhaps the Democrats should show up for meetings instead of walking out like children.

Absolutely, can't wait for the bodies of black and brown women to start piling up in the morgues. Poor women dying of lack of reproductive health care is our favorite torture porn.

Well, if you "can't wait," then who is the real sicko?

Are you so unfamiliar with vernacular English such that you don’t understand PP’s sarcasm? That if the dark vision the Christo-fascists want for our country comes to pass that women will be maimed and will die? Do you understand that making abortion illegal doesn’t stop abortion, it just kills women.

DP. Abortion will never be illegal again in this country. But morons like you are exactly why millions are voting against Democrats.

You understand very little about the legal process - I’m guessing Fox News School of Law? Roe won’t be overturned, but every single restriction on abortion will be upheld. States will be allowed to institute outright bans. Alabama will be allowed to make it a crime for someone to go out of state for reproductive health care. Poor women will die - this will make you super happy. Your sister will die because she will have an ectopic pregnancy and won’t be able to get a D&C - this will make you sad (one hopes). You will be able to adopt white babies - this will make you happy. Lots of poor black snd brown babies will rot in foster care or be abused by teen parents, you will give exactly zero effs.

You mean black babies - like the two children the Barretts adopted from Haiti? Like the black and brown children SO MANY white families have adopted?? Oh right, I forgot - when white parents adopt black or brown children, liberals then turn around and label them “white colonizers.” It would be farcical if it wasn’t all so incredibly, pathetically hypocritical.

And btw? I’m pro-choice. Your apocalyptic vision of this country is never going to occur, but I get that you thrive on the drama of it all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was an illegal appointment. Everyone knows you cannot appoint a justice in the last year of a President's term. She should be impeached and removed. If that's not possible, they should make the Supreme Court 1000000 justices. all Democrats except for 6 because that's where our democracy is headed.

Please show us where it states the bolded in the Constitution, or anywhere else. You do realize justices have been appointed in the last year of a President’s term before, right? So we’ll wait while you back up your ludicrous claim.

Merrick Fcking Garland.

Not at all what we’re talking about. The PP stated: Everyone knows you cannot appoint a justice in the last year of a President's term. So point to the law that backs this up.
https://www.scotusblog.com/2016/02/supreme-court-vacancies-in-presidential-election-years/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Roe will be gone by next summer

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mississippi-15-week-abortion-ban-supreme-court-review-request/

Oh, please.

[Anonymous]

Amy Barrett will degrade the SCOTUS so much that it will no longer be a respected institution but a completely partisan body. I think all SCOTUS justices should be appointed by a non-partisan body so that every justice on the SCOTUS is a moderate with a reputation for fairness in applying the law.
But with Kav and Barrett, the SCOTUS is just another partisan group. Democratic controlled congress will be in constant conflict with the once august SCOTUS. Sad. And all because a bunch of yahoos decided it would be fun to have a TV reality star as POTUS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When the controlling party breaks its own rules, then the nominee is illegitimate

Perhaps the Democrats should show up for meetings instead of walking out like children.

Absolutely, can't wait for the bodies of black and brown women to start piling up in the morgues. Poor women dying of lack of reproductive health care is our favorite torture porn.

Well, if you "can't wait," then who is the real sicko?

Are you so unfamiliar with vernacular English such that you don’t understand PP’s sarcasm? That if the dark vision the Christo-fascists want for our country comes to pass that women will be maimed and will die? Do you understand that making abortion illegal doesn’t stop abortion, it just kills women.

DP. Abortion will never be illegal again in this country. But morons like you are exactly why millions are voting against Democrats.

Actually, morons like you are why millions of people won't vote for a Republican ever. The entire point of this debate and the thing we've been fighting about for 50 years is ABSOLUTELY NOT whether some people can get a safe abortion in the United States. There always were and always will be people who can get that. The issue is whether EVERYBODY can get a safe abortion in the United States.

If Roe is struck down, there will be some people in some states who won't be able to get a safe abortion, and therefore will either use an unsafe method or be forced to carry a fetus they don't want. I personally do not wish this to happen to anyone, therefore I am a Democrat, and you are a moron because you don't realize that this is my position. I don't care if you think I am a babykiller or whatever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was an illegal appointment. Everyone knows you cannot appoint a justice in the last year of a President's term. She should be impeached and removed. If that's not possible, they should make the Supreme Court 1000000 justices. all Democrats except for 6 because that's where our democracy is headed.

Please show us where it states the bolded in the Constitution, or anywhere else. You do realize justices have been appointed in the last year of a President’s term before, right? So we’ll wait while you back up your ludicrous claim.

Merrick Fcking Garland.

Not at all what we’re talking about. The PP stated: Everyone knows you cannot appoint a justice in the last year of a President's term. So point to the law that backs this up.
https://www.scotusblog.com/2016/02/supreme-court-vacancies-in-presidential-election-years/

Oh brother. The PP was clearly being sarcastic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Amy Barrett will degrade the SCOTUS so much that it will no longer be a respected institution but a completely partisan body. I think all SCOTUS justices should be appointed by a non-partisan body so that every justice on the SCOTUS is a moderate with a reputation for fairness in applying the law.
But with Kav and Barrett, the SCOTUS is just another partisan group. Democratic controlled congress will be in constant conflict with the once august SCOTUS. Sad. And all because a bunch of yahoos decided it would be fun to have a TV reality star as POTUS.

You are truly unhinged. Kavanaugh has proven to be a fair and thoughtful justice, just as soon-to-be Justice Barrett will. It’s clear you thrive on drama and stirring the pot, but anyone with even a modicum of common sense knows you’re simply angry and bitter. Get over yourself. The SCOTUS will always be an august institution.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When the controlling party breaks its own rules, then the nominee is illegitimate

Perhaps the Democrats should show up for meetings instead of walking out like children.

Absolutely, can't wait for the bodies of black and brown women to start piling up in the morgues. Poor women dying of lack of reproductive health care is our favorite torture porn.

Well, if you "can't wait," then who is the real sicko?

Are you so unfamiliar with vernacular English such that you don’t understand PP’s sarcasm? That if the dark vision the Christo-fascists want for our country comes to pass that women will be maimed and will die? Do you understand that making abortion illegal doesn’t stop abortion, it just kills women.

DP. Abortion will never be illegal again in this country. But morons like you are exactly why millions are voting against Democrats.

Actually, morons like you are why millions of people won't vote for a Republican ever. The entire point of this debate and the thing we've been fighting about for 50 years is ABSOLUTELY NOT whether some people can get a safe abortion in the United States. There always were and always will be people who can get that. The issue is whether EVERYBODY can get a safe abortion in the United States.

If Roe is struck down, there will be some people in some states who won't be able to get a safe abortion, and therefore will either use an unsafe method or be forced to carry a fetus they don't want. I personally do not wish this to happen to anyone, therefore I am a Democrat, and you are a moron because you don't realize that this is my position. I don't care if you think I am a babykiller or whatever.

I don’t think you’re a baby killer - I’m also pro-choice. The point is that the apocalyptic portrait of a future America you seem to get off on portraying is never going to happen. Abortion will remain safe and legal for those who choose to have one. And I stand by my previous statement: people are voting against Democrats for many reasons, one of which is this constant melodrama and hyperbole you all seem to thrive on. It’s repulsive, alarmist, and unnecessary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When the controlling party breaks its own rules, then the nominee is illegitimate

Perhaps the Democrats should show up for meetings instead of walking out like children.

It was a stunt befitting a state legislature, not the United States Senate. The senators did the exact same thing as McConnell in 2016--they abdicated their responsibility. McConnell was wrong then and the Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee are wrong now.

The poster above is a serious candidate to be the next Attorney General. Her comments are in line with statements made by Sen. Harris at the VP debate. "They" are coming for you is a scare tactic worthy of the current administration. Democrats should be better.

It is also completely inappropriate for United States senators to hinge their vote on how a judicial nominee might vote on a case that would come before her in court. Most of the senators on the Judiciary Committee are lawyers and know better.

Trump will be playing golf in Europe or Saudi Arabia in 3 months. He is finito politically. Democrats need to quit acting like him and learn to govern.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When the controlling party breaks its own rules, then the nominee is illegitimate

Perhaps the Democrats should show up for meetings instead of walking out like children.

It was a stunt befitting a state legislature, not the United States Senate. The senators did the exact same thing as McConnell in 2016--they abdicated their responsibility. McConnell was wrong then and the Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee are wrong now.

The poster above is a serious candidate to be the next Attorney General. Her comments are in line with statements made by Sen. Harris at the VP debate. "They" are coming for you is a scare tactic worthy of the current administration. Democrats should be better.

It is also completely inappropriate for United States senators to hinge their vote on how a judicial nominee might vote on a case that would come before her in court. Most of the senators on the Judiciary Committee are lawyers and know better.

Trump will be playing golf in Europe or Saudi Arabia in 3 months. He is finito politically. Democrats need to quit acting like him and learn to govern.

"Hinge" probably would have read better as "condition" above. My bad.