How is the Supreme Court confirmation going to go?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Roe will be gone by next summer

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mississippi-15-week-abortion-ban-supreme-court-review-request/

Oh, please.

Oh please, what. The Federalist Society has teed this up for SCOTUS to hear this in the current term, the decision will be released next summer. With Barrett on board, it will be 5-4 or 6-3 for the applicant to prevail.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amy Barrett will degrade the SCOTUS so much that it will no longer be a respected institution but a completely partisan body. I think all SCOTUS justices should be appointed by a non-partisan body so that every justice on the SCOTUS is a moderate with a reputation for fairness in applying the law.
But with Kav and Barrett, the SCOTUS is just another partisan group. Democratic controlled congress will be in constant conflict with the once august SCOTUS. Sad. And all because a bunch of yahoos decided it would be fun to have a TV reality star as POTUS.

You are truly unhinged. Kavanaugh has proven to be a fair and thoughtful justice, just as soon-to-be Justice Barrett will. It’s clear you thrive on drama and stirring the pot, but anyone with even a modicum of common sense knows you’re simply angry and bitter. Get over yourself. The SCOTUS will always be an august institution.

I am not the PP you are replying to, but neither Kavanaugh nor Barrett have the jurist intellect of most of their predecessors. They are both political hacks funded by the Federalist Society, who are fulfilling the Koch's dream of a white nationalist christian oligarchy for the United States. And not even Christian...the pope is ostensibly against some of the beliefs of Judge Barrett, this is fringe philosophy.

[Anonymous]

I don’t think you’re a baby killer - I’m also pro-choice. The point is that the apocalyptic portrait of a future America you seem to get off on portraying is never going to happen. Abortion will remain safe and legal for those who choose to have one. And I stand by my previous statement: people are voting against Democrats for many reasons, one of which is this constant melodrama and hyperbole you all seem to thrive on. It’s repulsive, alarmist, and unnecessary.

Abortion will absolutely be curtailed in many red states where the GOP and extreme right wing money, combined with fringe Evangelical beliefs prevail.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was an illegal appointment. Everyone knows you cannot appoint a justice in the last year of a President's term. She should be impeached and removed. If that's not possible, they should make the Supreme Court 1000000 justices. all Democrats except for 6 because that's where our democracy is headed.

Please show us where it states the bolded in the Constitution, or anywhere else. You do realize justices have been appointed in the last year of a President’s term before, right? So we’ll wait while you back up your ludicrous claim.

Merrick Fcking Garland.

Not at all what we’re talking about. The PP stated: Everyone knows you cannot appoint a justice in the last year of a President's term. So point to the law that backs this up.
https://www.scotusblog.com/2016/02/supreme-court-vacancies-in-presidential-election-years/

Oh brother. The PP was clearly being sarcastic.

+1 bizarre that so many PPs cannot read the oozing sarcasm

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Roe will be gone by next summer

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mississippi-15-week-abortion-ban-supreme-court-review-request/

Oh, please.

Oh please, what. The Federalist Society has teed this up for SCOTUS to hear this in the current term, the decision will be released next summer. With Barrett on board, it will be 5-4 or 6-3 for the applicant to prevail.

Roe is settled law. Even if Judge Coney Barrett disagrees with the constitutional foundation for the decision, she and her fellow conservative justices are bound by long-standing precedent.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amy Barrett will degrade the SCOTUS so much that it will no longer be a respected institution but a completely partisan body. I think all SCOTUS justices should be appointed by a non-partisan body so that every justice on the SCOTUS is a moderate with a reputation for fairness in applying the law.
But with Kav and Barrett, the SCOTUS is just another partisan group. Democratic controlled congress will be in constant conflict with the once august SCOTUS. Sad. And all because a bunch of yahoos decided it would be fun to have a TV reality star as POTUS.

You are truly unhinged. Kavanaugh has proven to be a fair and thoughtful justice, just as soon-to-be Justice Barrett will. It’s clear you thrive on drama and stirring the pot, but anyone with even a modicum of common sense knows you’re simply angry and bitter. Get over yourself. The SCOTUS will always be an august institution.

I am not the PP you are replying to, but neither Kavanaugh nor Barrett have the jurist intellect of most of their predecessors. They are both political hacks funded by the Federalist Society, who are fulfilling the Koch's dream of a white nationalist christian oligarchy for the United States. And not even Christian...the pope is ostensibly against some of the beliefs of Judge Barrett, this is fringe philosophy.

Of course they do. That you hate them because they are conservatives is an entirely different matter. There is no disputing their excellent credentials.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Roe will be gone by next summer

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mississippi-15-week-abortion-ban-supreme-court-review-request/

Oh, please.

Oh please, what. The Federalist Society has teed this up for SCOTUS to hear this in the current term, the decision will be released next summer. With Barrett on board, it will be 5-4 or 6-3 for the applicant to prevail.

Roe is settled law. Even if Judge Coney Barrett disagrees with the constitutional foundation for the decision, she and her fellow conservative justices are bound by long-standing precedent.

Yep. But the fear-mongering among Democrats is truly something to behold.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amy Barrett will degrade the SCOTUS so much that it will no longer be a respected institution but a completely partisan body. I think all SCOTUS justices should be appointed by a non-partisan body so that every justice on the SCOTUS is a moderate with a reputation for fairness in applying the law.
But with Kav and Barrett, the SCOTUS is just another partisan group. Democratic controlled congress will be in constant conflict with the once august SCOTUS. Sad. And all because a bunch of yahoos decided it would be fun to have a TV reality star as POTUS.

You are truly unhinged. Kavanaugh has proven to be a fair and thoughtful justice, just as soon-to-be Justice Barrett will. It’s clear you thrive on drama and stirring the pot, but anyone with even a modicum of common sense knows you’re simply angry and bitter. Get over yourself. The SCOTUS will always be an august institution.

I am not the PP you are replying to, but neither Kavanaugh nor Barrett have the jurist intellect of most of their predecessors. They are both political hacks funded by the Federalist Society, who are fulfilling the Koch's dream of a white nationalist christian oligarchy for the United States. And not even Christian...the pope is ostensibly against some of the beliefs of Judge Barrett, this is fringe philosophy.

Of course they do. That you hate them because they are conservatives is an entirely different matter. There is no disputing their excellent credentials.

There actually is disputing their credentials, which seem.... inflated, shall we say. They are bought and paid for. They’re hacks. Just warm butts with the appropriate levels of personal compromise to guarantee they’ll vote as their paymasters want them to vote. Who owns them? No one precisely knows.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Roe will be gone by next summer

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mississippi-15-week-abortion-ban-supreme-court-review-request/

Oh, please.

Oh please, what. The Federalist Society has teed this up for SCOTUS to hear this in the current term, the decision will be released next summer. With Barrett on board, it will be 5-4 or 6-3 for the applicant to prevail.

Roe is settled law. Even if Judge Coney Barrett disagrees with the constitutional foundation for the decision, she and her fellow conservative justices are bound by long-standing precedent.

FFS. What suggests to you that these people respect anything but their own immoral desires?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amy Barrett will degrade the SCOTUS so much that it will no longer be a respected institution but a completely partisan body. I think all SCOTUS justices should be appointed by a non-partisan body so that every justice on the SCOTUS is a moderate with a reputation for fairness in applying the law.
But with Kav and Barrett, the SCOTUS is just another partisan group. Democratic controlled congress will be in constant conflict with the once august SCOTUS. Sad. And all because a bunch of yahoos decided it would be fun to have a TV reality star as POTUS.

You are truly unhinged. Kavanaugh has proven to be a fair and thoughtful justice, just as soon-to-be Justice Barrett will. It’s clear you thrive on drama and stirring the pot, but anyone with even a modicum of common sense knows you’re simply angry and bitter. Get over yourself. The SCOTUS will always be an august institution.

I am not the PP you are replying to, but neither Kavanaugh nor Barrett have the jurist intellect of most of their predecessors. They are both political hacks funded by the Federalist Society, who are fulfilling the Koch's dream of a white nationalist christian oligarchy for the United States. And not even Christian...the pope is ostensibly against some of the beliefs of Judge Barrett, this is fringe philosophy.

Of course they do. That you hate them because they are conservatives is an entirely different matter. There is no disputing their excellent credentials.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Roe will be gone by next summer

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mississippi-15-week-abortion-ban-supreme-court-review-request/

Oh, please.

Oh please, what. The Federalist Society has teed this up for SCOTUS to hear this in the current term, the decision will be released next summer. With Barrett on board, it will be 5-4 or 6-3 for the applicant to prevail.

Roe is settled law. Even if Judge Coney Barrett disagrees with the constitutional foundation for the decision, she and her fellow conservative justices are bound by long-standing precedent.

Yep. But the fear-mongering among Democrats is truly something to behold.

Really why did her cult scrub their website? I read it before they did. She is going to destroy us. She is not qualified period! All the Trumpers that think she's a good idea you will be the ones crying later.

[Anonymous]

Murkowski just folded.

Murkowski announces she will vote yes to confirm Amy Coney Barrett

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Murkowski just folded.

Murkowski announces she will vote yes to confirm Amy Coney Barrett

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/10/24/politics/murkowski-yes-vote-amy-coney-barrett-supreme-court/index.html

[Anonymous]

So, you know, it’s probably not just about guns and controlling women’s bodies, it’s also probably about oil. Because they so often go together...

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/oct/24/amy-coney-barrett-shell-recusal-supreme-court