How is the Supreme Court confirmation going to go?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When the controlling party breaks its own rules, then the nominee is illegitimate

Perhaps the Democrats should show up for meetings instead of walking out like children.

Absolutely, can't wait for the bodies of black and brown women to start piling up in the morgues. Poor women dying of lack of reproductive health care is our favorite torture porn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When the controlling party breaks its own rules, then the nominee is illegitimate

Perhaps the Democrats should show up for meetings instead of walking out like children.

Absolutely, can't wait for the bodies of black and brown women to start piling up in the morgues. Poor women dying of lack of reproductive health care is our favorite torture porn.

Well, if you "can't wait," then who is the real sicko?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When the controlling party breaks its own rules, then the nominee is illegitimate

Perhaps the Democrats should show up for meetings instead of walking out like children.

Absolutely, can't wait for the bodies of black and brown women to start piling up in the morgues. Poor women dying of lack of reproductive health care is our favorite torture porn.

Well, if you "can't wait," then who is the real sicko?

Are you so unfamiliar with vernacular English such that you don’t understand PP’s sarcasm? That if the dark vision the Christo-fascists want for our country comes to pass that women will be maimed and will die? Do you understand that making abortion illegal doesn’t stop abortion, it just kills women.

[Anonymous]

This is totally fine

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is totally fine

Meh, when I see hollywierd money pouring into sheriff races in Georgia and DA races in Louisiana it’s pretty hard to care about this.
Sorry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is totally fine

Meh, when I see hollywierd money pouring into sheriff races in Georgia and DA races in Louisiana it’s pretty hard to care about this.
Sorry.

Sheriffs and DAs run for elections. Federal judges do not. What do they need all this money for?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is totally fine

Meh, when I see hollywierd money pouring into sheriff races in Georgia and DA races in Louisiana it’s pretty hard to care about this.
Sorry.

Sheriffs and DAs run for elections. Federal judges do not. What do they need all this money for?

+1
This seems like it’s about payoffs. Like who paid off Bretty’s vast debt? Probably Leonard Leo. What does Leonard Leo get in return?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When the controlling party breaks its own rules, then the nominee is illegitimate

Perhaps the Democrats should show up for meetings instead of walking out like children.

Absolutely, can't wait for the bodies of black and brown women to start piling up in the morgues. Poor women dying of lack of reproductive health care is our favorite torture porn.

Well, if you "can't wait," then who is the real sicko?

Are you so unfamiliar with vernacular English such that you don’t understand PP’s sarcasm? That if the dark vision the Christo-fascists want for our country comes to pass that women will be maimed and will die? Do you understand that making abortion illegal doesn’t stop abortion, it just kills women.

DP. Abortion will never be illegal again in this country. But morons like you are exactly why millions are voting against Democrats.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like her.

Yep. Me too. She’ll be a good addition to the court.

An associate professor with 3 years in the bench? Sure, she’s *exceptional.*

Did you know that CHIEF JUSTICE Roberts had even less than three years on the bench? Did you know that Justice Kagan had NO prior judicial experience? Now you do.

John Roberts was a highly accomplished lawyer who argued 39 cases before the Supreme Court. Kagan was Solicitor General.

This is absolutely no comparison between Roberts and Kagan, on one hand, and Amy, on the other. She is mediocrity at its finest. Shameful.

An associate professor whose publications have had virtually no impact in the field. No litigation experience, only 3 years on the bench. She is the least qualified nominee in modern history.

Actually, I think Harriet Miers might have been...but GWB (rightly) pulled her nomination.

Yes, that was a stupid nomination but good that he saw sense and pulled it. Dems were not smart about this one. Instead of focusing on ideology, which was a losing proposition, they absolutely should have hammered again and again that Barrett does not have adequate credentials.

DP. Kind of tough to do when she received a well qualified from the ABA, no? Clerkships, prívate practice, distinguished career as a professor, appellate court judge. I’m not understanding your argument.

Yep. The PP has no argument, other than to keep repeating “she’s not qualified!” and hoping it sticks. Meanwhile, the ABA and everyone else who matters has agreed that she is eminently qualified. Poor PP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:More than 200 of her ND colleagues oppose her confirmation:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PG9NWuVnkTn9tbdsPiO4TOqSpUvDQ_YH/view

None of them are even law professors who work with her. They’re simply liberal hacks.

Meanwhile, more than 50 law professors from not only Notre Dame, but also Yale, Harvard, Columbia, Stanford, and more, penned this letter in support of Judge Barrett.

https://news.yahoo.com/over-50-law-professors-pen-145404125.html
https://abovethelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Amy-Coney-Barrett-Professors-Letter-of-Support.pdf

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is totally fine

Meh, when I see hollywierd money pouring into sheriff races in Georgia and DA races in Louisiana it’s pretty hard to care about this.
Sorry.

LOL, the $50 of hollywood money versus a billion dollars of undisclosed GOP money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Introducing Justice Amy Coney Barrett....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She will certainly have the shortest tenure in history when she is impeached and removed for lack of candor and perjury.

She didn't disclose some things, due in part to the rushed timeline(?) But perjury? How did she even answer enough questions to perjure herself? So little substance to her answers.

Even though we know Brett Kavanaugh perjured himself, I think it would be difficult to prove unfortunately due to the nature of the lies.

Apart from her perjury (she lied about some boards she served on, for one thing), look at the kind of question she couldn’t answer:

I mean...

Her answer was perfectly appropriate. So many ignorant posters here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It was an illegal appointment. Everyone knows you cannot appoint a justice in the last year of a President's term. She should be impeached and removed. If that's not possible, they should make the Supreme Court 1000000 justices. all Democrats except for 6 because that's where our democracy is headed.

Please show us where it states the bolded in the Constitution, or anywhere else. You do realize justices have been appointed in the last year of a President’s term before, right? So we’ll wait while you back up your ludicrous claim.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was an illegal appointment. Everyone knows you cannot appoint a justice in the last year of a President's term. She should be impeached and removed. If that's not possible, they should make the Supreme Court 1000000 justices. all Democrats except for 6 because that's where our democracy is headed.

Please show us where it states the bolded in the Constitution, or anywhere else. You do realize justices have been appointed in the last year of a President’s term before, right? So we’ll wait while you back up your ludicrous claim.

Bolded.