He didn't marry her, anyway. Arnault and Vodianova are "in a relationship" but not married. And Vodianova is loaded, not just from modeling but from her first husband. |
Plus you have to deal with visitation, custody, and all that stuff. |
You're missing the point. Arnault's fortune places him at the very top of the world. His family owns the fashion business. Depend upon it that he could get any girl he wanted, from anywhere at all. And he could certainly get a rich supermodel without three kids! Or just a rich girl without any kids. A new one every day! Vodianova is comfortable but compared to Arnault, her money is bubblegum change. |
You are missing the point. The kind of man a supermodel can attract - titled Englishmen, wealthy Frenchmen - is totally irrelevant to the situation of the average single mom, who could not get a man like that even if she had NO kids. "Arnault chose a single mom" says absolutely nothing about the options of single moms who read DCUM. |
There are tons of supermodels without kids, you know. Younger than Vodianova. Prettier too. Richer. From better families. They were all options to him. Certainly the son of a man who runs LVMH can churn through supermodels at a good clip! No, a single mom reader of DCUM won't get an Arnault-caliber man, and no one said that she could. But she may well attract her peer man who may well prefer her to his other options. Point is, single moms are sometimes chosen over others even by men who have ostensibly better options. |
NP and as an immigrant, I notice that the single moms in the podunk parts of the country really have no trouble finding someone to marry. One of my DH's relatives married a single mom of four and she ended up divorcing him and is now engaged to some loser. I think having multiple children by different men in this country has absolutely no stigma anymore. |
I don't think it's selfish but pragmatic. If I didn't choose to bring said child into the world, why must I be obliged to deal with them? Or finance them? That is just crazy. Also agree that single moms, especially the kind who "I was in a relationship and didn't use protection and then I got knocked up" aren't great life planners or people who are suitable to be life partners. Not being misogynistic, in fact, I'm a woman myself and I really dont think highly of such women. A friend and I had this discussion once about how it's more unfair for women but because of that, I reason that women need to be much smarter than men. It's 2018- unintended pregnancies shouldn't be happening ladies. And if you choose to have your babies, don't expect a knight in shining armor either. |
If you are not picky, you can find someone. That’s why some fug single moms have no problem getting remarried while DCUM women with graduate degrees are single into their 40s. |
Jesus, stop babbling about supermodels as if that has anything to do with the prospects of single moms getting men to commit to them. Just stop. Your "point" that some rich guy chose a single mom when he could have had someone else is immensely stupid and irrelevant. |
| No, and I would actually advise my son to steer clear of you, too. Too much baggage |
So cute in your helpless, name-calling fury! Only Jeff can tell me to stop. Until then, I'll babble to my heart's delight! |
lmao! This is 100% true. Losers come in all forms, like many on here who falsely think they are superior to others. Why they are single and miserable. |
So what? At least they arent burdening anyone with their kids. |
Babble away. You only make yourself sound hilariously stupid. |
| To answer the original question, I'd probably be up for a drink and a bang, especially if you're hot, but I'm not interested in a relationship with that kind of baggage. |