OP here. I don't agree with many of Hillary's positions either (or maybe I do depending on what day she decides to change them). I'm not here to defend Hillary. My gripe is specifically with people who reason themselves into supporting Trump. Trump has called for the US govt to create a database of Muslims in this country. Essentially a registry: http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/trump-says-he-would-certainly-implement-muslim-database-n466716. This wasn't "blown out of proportion by the liberal media." He stands by this and has doubled down on it. There is no middle ground in that policy. You either start limiting our freedoms, or you don't. What I am hearing is that you believe Hillary is so dangerous, that you are willing to sacrifice our country's integrity and the freedoms of innocent citizens because you think Trump is that much better? What has Trump done to garner such confidence? What has he ever done in his life to show he can deliver? Become rich? There are plenty of rich people in this world. Do the rights of others not matter to you? Because simply saying Hillary is worse doesn't excuse the fact that you are supporting a person who holds these type of views. Using Trump as an anti-Hillary vote means you support such discriminatory policies and racist/sexist views. There no way around that. I cannot with good conscience ever befriend such a person with such a stance. |
I guess the FBI will eventually inform the public as to the crime committed. And, as for the length of time to read emails - you could be right. It shouldn’t take that long. Which makes me think this investigation is more than just the emails. Is it the Clinton Foundation? Is it that she “deleted” emails that she should have turned over? Guess we will see....... |
Lots of liberal do not support BIBI. Don't confuse AIPAC with liberal Jews |
Op here. I don't believe all or even most Trump supporters are racist. I do; however, believe they are ignorant. And what they don't realize is that in their blindness in hating the Clintons or any other Democrat, they are supporting, in my opinion, a modern day, more dangerous version of George Wallace. A person who is promoting policies that would actually strip our freedoms away. That's not even the half of it either. |
Whatever. It's the FBI. They haven't said she is a target. But if they find something, they can go criminal at any time. OIG can't. |
Violation of records act, possible espionage, possible racketeering. As for reading the emails--you must have forgotten that she deleted most of the emails--and the FBI subpoenaed the server and, apparently, was able to recover some emails. Had she turned everything over when she was supposed to, it would not have taken so long. So, I imagine "reading" them came after they were recovered. And, remember, we just found out recently that HRC's crony--Terry McAuliffe-- is also under investigation. Possible connection there? Of course, he was selling visas before he was elected along with HRC's brother--lots of possibilities. |
How much difference is there really, between people who are bigots and people who tolerate bigotry? This is the possible leader of our country that we are talking about. |
Op here. Don't care much for Hillary, but I see nothing on this list that makes an anti-Hillary vote for Trump reasonable given the extensive list of problems I can cite regarding Trump, his record and stated policies. |
Before Obama leaves, he's bringing 10K Syrian refugees in. They can't vet them in that timeframe |
+1 It's also concerning that he is threatening to go after judges and political opponents simply for disagreeing with him. Those are the threats of a dictator. So it's not just the rights of others. He is threatening the democratic system and the rule of law. |
Right, and he probably won't get to 10,000, because they are still undergoing intense scrutiny. http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/01/politics/obama-pledge-10000-syrian-refugees-falling-short/ |
Trump isn't talking about just refugees (and yes, they can vet them. It takes years to vet them. http://time.com/4116619/syrian-refugees-screening-process/ ). He's talking about all Muslims. Muslims from Europe who don't need visas. Muslims from other countries who do. Muslims coming here as tourists. Muslims coming here to visit family. Muslims coming here to go to college. Muslims coming here to work. |
Don't you think, between a year with the FBI and the OIG report, they would have found something serious by now? That's two teams investigating simultaneously. |
Not much difference. But I think there is a difference intent. Some of Trumps supporters truly may not understand what the impact some of his policies will have on others.. For example, I have a friend who supports Trump bc he believes Trump will do a better job of protecting our country from Muslim extremists. He thinks some level of banning Muslims from the middle eastern region may be effective in accomplishing this objective. I don't believe he is a bigot, as I know him well and know the company he keeps. But his fears have lead him to support policies that promote bigotry and that are against this country's founding values. In order to have a serious conservation with him about this issue, it's important to understand where is coming from. So simply calling or labeling him a bigot is too simplistic. It's more complex than that. |
I get this. It's kind of like Romney. I doubt he was a racist. i doubt he even liked Trump. But he was willing to let the guy raise money for him, and when asked to address the birther issue he said something to the effect of "I don't agree with them but I need their votes". So he's not racist but he is complicit with racists. |