"OBAMA MADE ME DO IT!"
|
I know this message isn't going to come through, but what you're saying is that you're losing the right to be intolerant of gays and transsexuals without being called out on it. If your definition of respect includes not calling someone's intolerant opinion intolerant, then it is untenable to respect all people and all points-of-view simultaneously. Society cannot simultaneously respect black people and be unable to call out someone who says they don't like black people on their intolerance. It's not too far back in history that a lot of people used religious grounds to oppose inter-racial marriages. Finally, with respect to affirmative action, I agree this is a debatable area. There is a lot of evidence to suggest that hiring managers' perceptions of the "strongest candidate" is colored by their own racial/ethnic/gender biases. Affirmative action seeks to overcome those biases. It does probably sometimes lead to weaker candidates being hired, but so, overwhelmingly, does unconscious bias. Also, affirmative action applies, legally, in a minority of hiring decisions. If private entities decide to engage in affirmative action, that is their choice and no one is forcing them to do it. |
| The bottom line is that there is nothing whatsoever in religion that gives you the right to be bigoted toward gay people, or to deny them goods or services. You may think they are sinners in your own eyes, and that's your prerogative but even in your own faith, if you are Christian, it's their sin it's not for you to judge on, and given they have done no wrong to you, stop acting as though they have. |
Question: if a Muslim baker denies a gay patron, whose side does the liberal take? |
Well said. There continue to be contemporary studies showing hiring bias based on socioeconomic factors, such as "black sounding names" whether overt or unconscious so it's unfortunately still something that needs to be adjusted for. |
| ^ And even with affirmative action, I don't think there is any part of it that forces employers to hire totally unqualified or unsuitable applicants. |
Why is this a question? A Muslim baker has no more right to deny a gay patron than a Christian one. And by the way, I think this is a red herring because most of the things I've seen relating to this were either fake (i.e. Shoebat's viral videos purporting to call Muslim bakers - which were staged and faked) or gross misportrayals (the Muslim bakery that was asked about a wedding cake for a gay couple but said no - and it was because they don't make wedding cakes, period, whether gay or straight). |
You have just demonstrated #2 above in your response - intolerance for people with opposing views. And, I said that not all points of views should be respected. Check your comprehension. All PEOPLE should be respected. PP asked what we are losing in the name of diversity. I have listed some of those things. Whether you agree or not is another issue. And, as for #5 - it is a real issue. My DH lost out on a position because he is a white male. That was the ONLY reason. His qualifications were head and shoulders above other applicants, but because he was white and male he didn’t get the position. They were looking for “diversity.” |
I thought we were talking about multiculturalism. None of these things have to do with other cultures. In fact the list is pretty American. Gays aren't from another country. We brought African Americans here hundreds of years ago. |
Diversity/Multiculturalism, as it says in the title. |
With regard to #2 I never said I was tolerant of other people's views. Why should I be tolerant or respectful toward someone who is being abusive and intolerant toward someone for no reason other than race, gender or other aspects of mere circumstance or birth condition? What gives someone the right to judge others on their condition by mere fact that they were born in America, as white, Christian, and better-off financially? I call BS on #5. How does your DH know for a fact that his qualifications were head and shoulders above all of the other candidates? How would he be privy to confidential HR decisionmaking? Did he see their resumes? Was he present for their interviews? I doubt it. How could he possibly know for a fact that they weren't qualified? More likely he's making assumptions, because nobody hires unqualified people based solely on diversity. |
And the Mexicans who the Trump supporters love to hate have been around and part of the Southwest for 500 years... probably far longer than when the Trump haters' own grandparents sailed over from Poland or Germany or wherever in the 1800s-1900s... |
| Okay, so still nothing legitimately lost... |
In your opinion. |
Our culture was lost. You may not like our culture, but to say that it is not lost is not true. And you took it by force, not by talking us politely out of it. And you are happy that you took it? It makes you feel righteous? |