If you are a sugar baby why did you decide to be one?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My last few relationships haven't been official SB relationships, but they have been 8-15 years older than me and pay for our dates (I'll buy some snacks at the gas station or little things like that).

My friends have sugar daddies who pay per date. They have larger age gaps and more red flags but it works for them.

As far as why, because of the money. I'm more into women. If I'm with a man, he better be taking care of me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I was a college student in DC living in a dump and he put me up in a great apartment for my senior year. He only came by once a week and he was very nice.

How can you say he was “very nice?”

Be turned a young women (almost a teenager) into a prostitute and lied to his family/broke his marriage vows.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The problem is that society is so judgemental of women (and men) who engaged in paid emotional or physical intimacy.

If there wasn't so much judgement, I'd do it in a heartbeat. I'd love the attention and perks, honestly. But in today' technological age, it would be putting my photo and info out there and then inevitably getting found out by my circle. I wouldn't want that. My friends and colleagues are liberals, but when it comes to bedrooms, very conservative... like most people.

If you'd "love the attention", you aren't attractive enough to be sugar.

PP you replied to. I am multiethnic and notice that I attract a certain subset of men. In the DC area, they're mostly middle-aged like me (except I look much younger), highly-educated, most of them have dad bods, and they appreciate my looks, multicultural origins and conversation. I am well-read, can discuss current affairs easily and have lived in multiple countries. So no, I wouldn't be the typical sex-only younger sugar baby. But given the attention I get now, and invitations... there is definitely a market for intelligent listeners who are also easy on the eyes

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Most of the people I met off an old site SA were not exclusive to their SD. I knew that and arranged for pay per visit and had a very nice stable with lots of variety.

Easy money if you’re willing to have fun.

A stable is where you keep animals, not humans.

Your language says a lot about how much you respected the women you rented.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Plenty of women marry rich guys primarily because they are rich but their motivation isn’t that much different than sugar babies. When a 45 year old woman marries a 70 year old rich guy, what’s the real difference between a young trophy wife and a sugar baby except one wears a ring. I’m not a fan of either!

The wife has social legitimacy, legal status, and perhaps a better chance of her relationship lasting. 45 is an age where someone should understand their life goals pretty well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I absolutely would have done this in college and law school if it was a thing. I like attention and I like sex and I like money. I don't look down on sex work and see it as honest labor. Being seen with an older man might raise a few eyebrows if I introduce my sugar daddy as "my date," but it would not be something that would get back to my family or work associates.

I mean, wealthy older men “taking care” of beautiful young women has been a thing forever.

[Anonymous]

I did it and married my SD. I live in a nice life. I did for money and better life. I might of held out for a richer man but I don’t work. So can’t complain.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The problem is that society is so judgemental of women (and men) who engaged in paid emotional or physical intimacy.

If there wasn't so much judgement, I'd do it in a heartbeat. I'd love the attention and perks, honestly. But in today' technological age, it would be putting my photo and info out there and then inevitably getting found out by my circle. I wouldn't want that. My friends and colleagues are liberals, but when it comes to bedrooms, very conservative... like most people.

you’d love the “attention” of being “3 holes capable” or however that PP put it? I’m not sure if sex work should be illegal, but it’s not like Pretty Woman. It’s work, likely often unpleasant, and dangerous.

So is marriage.

You can set sexual boundaries in marriage that won’t work in sugaring.

There are lots of boundaries in sugaring. They often draw up contracts regarding what will / won't be included and sugar babies absolutely can say no

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a SB because it makes sense. Most men are cheaters or have some major flaw. Why settle down with someone who’s going to treat.

I’m smart, beautiful, and in my 40s. I’ll ride it out til it ends.

Smart woman.

I'm doing this too! I'm early 40s, Masters in Kinesiology. I'm a personal trainer and Pilates teacher (own my studio) and thru that I meet tons of men. I'm very petite so I have alwys looked younger. I've been taken on wonderful trips and received beautiful jewelry and expensive bags and clothes. When I needed to upgrade my studio one of my guys gave me the money. It saves me tens of thousands on paying for my worldly vacations and I am keeping the goods to sell for extra retirement money.

I know I won't look like this forever but so far so good.

It amazes me why men waste their money like this. Can someone explain? Some wealthy women may do so but nowhere near the extent men do it.

I actually credit to this sexy sugar baby but not saying " because she deserved it".

Supply and demand. Because men like sex with attractive women out of their league and most can’t easily do that without paying for it. If men could do this for free they would, believe me. You can think of it as paying for experiences vs things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I absolutely would have done this in college and law school if it was a thing. I like attention and I like sex and I like money. I don't look down on sex work and see it as honest labor. Being seen with an older man might raise a few eyebrows if I introduce my sugar daddy as "my date," but it would not be something that would get back to my family or work associates.

I mean, wealthy older men “taking care” of beautiful young women has been a thing forever.

And they sadly continue to do so. Women can have $1 billion on their account but if a man is willing to give them $100 every month they will take that money and save theirs. Unlike men women are not into that provider mindset nonsense. Despite the fact that women now have their own money and are fully independent financially if a man is stupid enough to offer them money simply because they are beautiful of for sex they will gladly take the money.

It's actually so bad that a man will still give money to a woman who he knows has far more money than him. This utter stupidity of men needs to stop.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I did it and married my SD. I live in a nice life. I did for money and better life. I might of held out for a richer man but I don’t work. So can’t complain.

How did you meet him? Is there a site for sugar babies seeking daddy’s?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a SB because it makes sense. Most men are cheaters or have some major flaw. Why settle down with someone who’s going to treat.

I’m smart, beautiful, and in my 40s. I’ll ride it out til it ends.

Smart woman.

I'm doing this too! I'm early 40s, Masters in Kinesiology. I'm a personal trainer and Pilates teacher (own my studio) and thru that I meet tons of men. I'm very petite so I have alwys looked younger. I've been taken on wonderful trips and received beautiful jewelry and expensive bags and clothes. When I needed to upgrade my studio one of my guys gave me the money. It saves me tens of thousands on paying for my worldly vacations and I am keeping the goods to sell for extra retirement money.

I know I won't look like this forever but so far so good.

It amazes me why men waste their money like this. Can someone explain? Some wealthy women may do so but nowhere near the extent men do it.

I actually credit to this sexy sugar baby but not saying " because she deserved it".

Supply and demand. Because men like sex with attractive women out of their league and most can’t easily do that without paying for it. If men could do this for free they would, believe me. You can think of it as paying for experiences vs things.

That's stupid. Men derive a lot of sexual satisfaction from PIV. The woman could be 400 lbs, very ugly, if a man finds a way to cover her face and rail her from.the back he will do so..once he cums that urge for sex is gone. So the fact that some men are willing to put a woman on payroll just for that come on lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I absolutely would have done this in college and law school if it was a thing. I like attention and I like sex and I like money. I don't look down on sex work and see it as honest labor. Being seen with an older man might raise a few eyebrows if I introduce my sugar daddy as "my date," but it would not be something that would get back to my family or work associates.

I mean, wealthy older men “taking care” of beautiful young women has been a thing forever.

And they sadly continue to do so. Women can have $1 billion on their account but if a man is willing to give them $100 every month they will take that money and save theirs. Unlike men women are not into that provider mindset nonsense. Despite the fact that women now have their own money and are fully independent financially if a man is stupid enough to offer them money simply because they are beautiful of for sex they will gladly take the money.

It's actually so bad that a man will still give money to a woman who he knows has far more money than him. This utter stupidity of men needs to stop.

This is ridiculous. No woman with a billion dollars will take $100 a week for sex. I’m wealthy because of family money and barely date, but when I do I split bills and would never, ever sleep with someone I don’t like/want. This is some weird incel stuff here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I absolutely would have done this in college and law school if it was a thing. I like attention and I like sex and I like money. I don't look down on sex work and see it as honest labor. Being seen with an older man might raise a few eyebrows if I introduce my sugar daddy as "my date," but it would not be something that would get back to my family or work associates.

I mean, wealthy older men “taking care” of beautiful young women has been a thing forever.

And they sadly continue to do so. Women can have $1 billion on their account but if a man is willing to give them $100 every month they will take that money and save theirs. Unlike men women are not into that provider mindset nonsense. Despite the fact that women now have their own money and are fully independent financially if a man is stupid enough to offer them money simply because they are beautiful of for sex they will gladly take the money.

It's actually so bad that a man will still give money to a woman who he knows has far more money than him. This utter stupidity of men needs to stop.

This is ridiculous. No woman with a billion dollars will take $100 a week for sex. I’m wealthy because of family money and barely date, but when I do I split bills and would never, ever sleep with someone I don’t like/want. This is some weird incel stuff here.

What else can you expect from men spending their weekends on a mommy site?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I absolutely would have done this in college and law school if it was a thing. I like attention and I like sex and I like money. I don't look down on sex work and see it as honest labor. Being seen with an older man might raise a few eyebrows if I introduce my sugar daddy as "my date," but it would not be something that would get back to my family or work associates.

I mean, wealthy older men “taking care” of beautiful young women has been a thing forever.

And they sadly continue to do so. Women can have $1 billion on their account but if a man is willing to give them $100 every month they will take that money and save theirs. Unlike men women are not into that provider mindset nonsense. Despite the fact that women now have their own money and are fully independent financially if a man is stupid enough to offer them money simply because they are beautiful of for sex they will gladly take the money.

It's actually so bad that a man will still give money to a woman who he knows has far more money than him. This utter stupidity of men needs to stop.

This is ridiculous. No woman with a billion dollars will take $100 a week for sex. I’m wealthy because of family money and barely date, but when I do I split bills and would never, ever sleep with someone I don’t like/want. This is some weird incel stuff here.

The idea is that women regardless of means is.morr likely to take from a less wealthy man because women aren't stuck with the provider mindset