Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Omitting the detail that your H to be was widowed and raised three children on his own is, while admirable, an odd detail to omit in a discussion about having another baby. If he raised those three kids alone with no family help while losing his spouse, I find it very hard to believe he doesn’t have a strong opinion about having a newborn in his 50’s, with two kids launched and his youngest heading to college in two years. It doesn’t add up. This kind of guy is either stratospherically wealthy (and won’t help, but will hire help), or….doesn’t exist.
It's because none of this happened. OP is telling fairytales. She made the whole thing up, and when most people weren't falling for her ridiculous OP and her post was losing momentum she added this little detail to keep it going in hopes that a few suckers would believe her and go on about how wonderful that is and what beautiful second chance blah blah. Lies all of it
DP. If someone calls troll as hard as you are here, you really should come up with a specific reason other than "The OP didn't give us EVERY single detail in one perfect novel of a first posting, so I say it's all lies." And no, PP, I am not the OP myself, though I suspect you'd come back to claim that.
Her post really seem to trigger you badly, PP. Wondering why you're so insistent on dismissing the OP's issue as "fairy tales," which you've come back to do more than once now.
I agree, she should have really mentioned at the start that he raised his kids as a single parent and not as a divorced parent doing 50 percent
custody etc. But
her not doing so, while dumb, doesn't automatically negate everything.
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}