|
my god here’s the former governor. |
X1000000 |
Lol, ok. Read into it whatever you want. And don’t send your DD there based on an op-Ed written by one person. But does he have a valid point or not? You can agree with the message even if you take issue with the delivery. |
|
DP. Which was, of course, deeply sexist. I’d be fine with a policy like you suggest and yet based on this, I’d never send a child to Purdue because of the remarkably blatant sexism on display from the head of the whole school. I’d be worried about her safety. If she was groped by a professor during office hours (happened to my college roommate so this is something I lived up close), I don’t see how an administration led by someone as comfortable with casual sexism as this president is would be trustworthy. |
One person? The president and former governor of the state, writing in the Washington Post? No one is in a better position to speak for the school? Just sit back and enjoy. |
|
Universities, themselves, need to always refer to their students as adults. Start with athletics, and announcers don't call them kids
Why is the university EVEN talking/listening to someone other than the adult who's enrolled. Adult begins at 18 |
No one is disagreeing with the idea that encouraging independence is part of college (though people vary in what constitutes support vs. helicoptering--though few would disagree that he provides extreme examples). It's just that the college president added up the handful of crazy anecdotes over the years and then wrote as if it had something broader to tell us about moms (or dads, or students, as a group). So I think he is wrong. I think some people like to think that there are all these crazy helicoptering parents (rather than a few) because it makes them feel better about themselves and their own very reasonable level of parenting involvement. Of course we all have to make complex decisions about how much support/independence to give our children and when. And we question whether or not we are right. It's an age-old question. It's in proverbs (roots & wings and whatnot). Just a few generations ago people rarely left their home towns, commonly worked in family trades and businesses and women typically lived with their parents until they were married. There's nothing unusual about this, and there's long been men condemning too much 'mothering'. It's sexist. |
The data overwhelmingly shows otherwise. |
I actually agree with the idea that professors should not have to interact with student parents and yet still won’t send a smart girl to Purdue under this president. The casual sexism in the editorial is it’s own issue and for me a bigger one than what the author meant to talk about. He betrayed a lot by this article. |
DP. The thing is that the examples cited in the article of parental overstepping scream of a person (man or woman) with high anxiety. I don't know about the PP above who claimed depression but I have an anxiety disorder and I can recognize some actions of "helicopter parents" not as trying to control their child's life but as poor mental health. |
I am very familiar with who Mitch Daniels is, probably more so than most people on here. I agree the article is tone deaf and unfairly singled out moms. The timing is atrocious. There are much better ways to make the point that parents of college students need to let go. But he’s right in that point. You know he is. That’s why you’re ignoring the message and making sweeping generalizations about the import of this on the university. |
+1000 |
oh yes, let's just send the dumb girls
|