| Just lay back and enjoy the ride, ladies. |
+1,000 The outrage is right on cue and totally predictable. Can't have a Republican man stating truths! But a Democrat? Bring it on. |
Good catch! Purdue is in Indiana which is the birthplace of the KKK. Daniels is a douche in a long line of Republican Indiana douches |
Yup. And her son is in his 30s, not away at school for the first time at age 18. Weird. |
|
If he had a D by his name we’d be unhappy to discover another Joe Manchin in our party. |
Isn’t Pence from Indiana? So, yeah… |
He was a big timer once- https://www.politico.com/story/2011/05/behind-the-daniels-family-veto-055459 |
| Wonder how this will play on campus. |
+1 million |
Yeah, sorry but that is your issue. And I mean that in the gentlest way possible. You decide how people treat you. You have control over what kind of behavior you accept from your spouse. If you are unhappy (clearly you are), then you should change it. |
It's the context. |
Interesting. |
We were focused on the content AND the logic. I didn't know who Mitch Daniels was other than the college president--others here told me more details. I just found the op-ed sexist and poor reasoning to throw out some extreme examples of overparenting out of the tens of thousands of parents at his school and act like it tells you anything meaningful about mothers. It's dumb. That he turns out to say other dumb, outdated things (e.g. praising a black scholar by calling him "the rarest of creatures") just adds to the picture. NO ONE is saying the crazy examples he gives aren't bad. But he's been a college president of a school of 42 k for over a decade. That is over 100000 moms who have supported students at his school. That there are a handful of overbearing, over-the-top examples out of over 100,000 people is expected, not something to write an op-ed about moms about. I really don't understand how you cannot understand this basic point. |
It’s not going to matter for the most part and won’t have much impact. He isn’t getting fired; he personally appointed the men who would fire him. Students won’t care because they don’t read the Washington Post. Women faculty can’t take risks with him in charge and will keep their mouths shut. Mostly what will happen is that any serial sexual harassers on the Purdue staff will be relieved to see that they can continue harassing young women students because they have more messaging from leadership on how women are second-class citizens. (They probably already understood that about the president, I am sure, but additional data points are always useful to harassers looking to see how far they can push things.) A few tenured women professors might quietly start looking to transfer. Faculty recruitment of women might take a little hit, but with tenure so difficult, no woman will turn down a tenure spot even with an obvious misogynist in charge. Nothing significant will happen. |