stop whining about voter ID requirements

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You need ID to cash a check.
You need ID to buy alcohol.
You need ID to buy tobacco.
You need ID to buy a gun.
You need ID to get into many govt buildings.
You need ID to get onto secure federal property.
You need ID to rent or buy an apartment or home.
You need ID to get on a plane.
You need ID to get a library card.
You need ID to buy a fishing license.
You need ID to open a bank account.
You need ID to receive govt benefits like WIC and EBT.
You need ID to apply for a job.
You need ID to buy or rent a car.
You need ID to go into any school building in the country.
You need ID to get medical treatment.
You need ID to apply to colleges.
You need ID to get into a many bars/clubs.
You need ID to get into many community centers / pools


But voting doesn’t require an ID.




If you oppose a law requiring showing an ID in order to vote, then you are for voter fraud. There is no other plausible reason.

You seem to be ignorant of the fact that many people do very few of those things.
I just went to the dentist. They know me by name, sight, and even by my voice. No ID needed. I don’t drink, smoke or own a gun — that cuts your list down considerably. I’ve had one of my bank accounts since I was six, and even then I realized that many people could not afford to have bank accounts.

TLDR: Your lengthy list really doesn’t support your conclusion. If you think it does, you either need to work on your critical thinking skills, or you are for voter disenfranchisement. There is no other plausible reason. See how that works?

When you first went to your dentst, I don't believe that they didn't ask for your address and some form of ID and/or a form completed by you showing your personal information.

[Anonymous]

You seem to be ignorant of the fact that many people do very few of those things.
I just went to the dentist. They know me by name, sight, and even by my voice. No ID needed. I don’t drink, smoke or own a gun — that cuts your list down considerably. I’ve had one of my bank accounts since I was six, and even then I realized that many people could not afford to have bank accounts.

TLDR: Your lengthy list really doesn’t support your conclusion. If you think it does, you either need to work on your critical thinking skills, or you are for voter disenfranchisement. There is no other plausible reason. See how that works?

I think some of you simply want to be outraged about SOMETHING.

[Anonymous]

There is no voter fraud problem. The election fraud problem is voter suppression by state and local government officials.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There is no voter fraud problem. The election fraud problem is voter suppression by state and local government officials.

There is no voter suppression problem. That narrative surfaces when a Democrat loses an election he/she was predicted to win.
Blame the damn polls that never get it right. Don't blame suppression.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no voter fraud problem. The election fraud problem is voter suppression by state and local government officials.

There is no voter suppression problem. That narrative surfaces when a Democrat loses an election he/she was predicted to win.
Blame the damn polls that never get it right. Don't blame suppression.

True or false: the people most impacted by these laws are poor and POC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no voter fraud problem. The election fraud problem is voter suppression by state and local government officials.

There is no voter suppression problem. That narrative surfaces when a Democrat loses an election he/she was predicted to win.
Blame the damn polls that never get it right. Don't blame suppression.

Sane people don’t ignore all the studies and evidence that says that suppression prevents voting, but you go ahead and side with “Corporations Are People Too” and “Racially Motivated Suppression Isn’t A Problem Anymore Because Racism is Over” John Roberts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You need ID to cash a check.
You need ID to buy alcohol.
You need ID to buy tobacco.
You need ID to buy a gun.
You need ID to get into many govt buildings.
You need ID to get onto secure federal property.
You need ID to rent or buy an apartment or home.
You need ID to get on a plane.
You need ID to get a library card.
You need ID to buy a fishing license.
You need ID to open a bank account.
You need ID to receive govt benefits like WIC and EBT.
You need ID to apply for a job.
You need ID to buy or rent a car.
You need ID to go into any school building in the country.
You need ID to get medical treatment.
You need ID to apply to colleges.
You need ID to get into a many bars/clubs.
You need ID to get into many community centers / pools


But voting doesn’t require an ID.




If you oppose a law requiring showing an ID in order to vote, then you are for voter fraud. There is no other plausible reason.

You seem to be ignorant of the fact that many people do very few of those things.
I just went to the dentist. They know me by name, sight, and even by my voice. No ID needed. I don’t drink, smoke or own a gun — that cuts your list down considerably. I’ve had one of my bank accounts since I was six, and even then I realized that many people could not afford to have bank accounts.

TLDR: Your lengthy list really doesn’t support your conclusion. If you think it does, you either need to work on your critical thinking skills, or you are for voter disenfranchisement. There is no other plausible reason. See how that works?

When you first went to your dentst, I don't believe that they didn't ask for your address and some form of ID and/or a form completed by you showing your personal information.

- You're an anonymous stranger on the internet who apparently lacks the experience or even the imagination to get that different people in different environments may have different experiences. Okay. So you have limitations.

- You're also changing your bar. The tediously long list of things was about ID -- not about addresses and medical history -- ID. And, let me repeat this for you: No ID needed.

[Anonymous]

You all know there are people still alive that don’t have official birth certificates, right?

https://www.npr.org/2018/09/07/644648955/for-older-voters-getting-the-right-id-can-be-especially-tough" target="_new" rel="nofollow"> https://www.npr.org/2018/09/07/644648955/for-older-voters-getting-the-right-id-can-be-especially-tough

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no voter fraud problem. The election fraud problem is voter suppression by state and local government officials.

There is no voter suppression problem. That narrative surfaces when a Democrat loses an election he/she was predicted to win.
Blame the damn polls that never get it right. Don't blame suppression.

It always facinates me when people deny decades, even centuries of racial oppression.

If you're speaking from your own experience, you're probably more white than right. No one has brought up polls. Distraction much?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no voter fraud problem. The election fraud problem is voter suppression by state and local government officials.

There is no voter suppression problem. That narrative surfaces when a Democrat loses an election he/she was predicted to win.
Blame the damn polls that never get it right. Don't blame suppression.

True or false: the people most impacted by these laws are poor and POC.

No. How would it?

[Anonymous]

Did George Washington, Ben Franklin, or Thomas Jefferson show ID to vote in America’s first elections? Anyone?

Thanks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no voter fraud problem. The election fraud problem is voter suppression by state and local government officials.

There is no voter suppression problem. That narrative surfaces when a Democrat loses an election he/she was predicted to win.
Blame the damn polls that never get it right. Don't blame suppression.

True or false: the people most impacted by these laws are poor and POC.

No. How would it?

Seriously? It’s difficult to take the argument for new voter ID laws seriously when this is the kind of arguments made on its behalf. Absolutely gobsmacking.

[Anonymous]

Voting is a right, it’s in the Constitution. Should be no limits, just like you don’t want limits on gun control. If you are an originalist or abide by Constitution you should be against voter ID. Just like you are against any rules on guns.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You need ID to cash a check.
You need ID to buy alcohol.
You need ID to buy tobacco.
You need ID to buy a gun.
You need ID to get into many govt buildings.
You need ID to get onto secure federal property.
You need ID to rent or buy an apartment or home.
You need ID to get on a plane.
You need ID to get a library card.
You need ID to buy a fishing license.
You need ID to open a bank account.
You need ID to receive govt benefits like WIC and EBT.
You need ID to apply for a job.
You need ID to buy or rent a car.
You need ID to go into any school building in the country.
You need ID to get medical treatment.
You need ID to apply to colleges.
You need ID to get into a many bars/clubs.
You need ID to get into many community centers / pools


But voting doesn’t require an ID.




If you oppose a law requiring showing an ID in order to vote, then you are for voter fraud. There is no other plausible reason.

Voting is a right, not a privilege. Furthermore, where is any evidence that there is even voter fraud to begin with? This is just a new way to disenfranchise black people.

How many black people don't have a state issued ID? And why can't they get one if they currently don't have one?

Have you gotten your Real ID yet?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no voter fraud problem. The election fraud problem is voter suppression by state and local government officials.

There is no voter suppression problem. That narrative surfaces when a Democrat loses an election he/she was predicted to win.
Blame the damn polls that never get it right. Don't blame suppression.

True or false: the people most impacted by these laws are poor and POC.

No. How would it?

Not everyone has drivers license or a Passport.