DP...All I see is a very skinny woman with the body of a teenage boy. |
|
The really striking thing to me is that she is only 5'6". She looks much taller in those runway pics.
The one photo on this thread I think is photoshopped is the one of her when she is older with a very short black dress. Those legs can't be hers--that is just not not the way good legs like hers age. They look like my legs and I am aware enough to avoid dresses above the knees. |
| The ugliest model of all times. But she is interestingly ugly. She was highly paid for in the context of what she personified for the majority of Americans at that time. |
|
| Her sister Lotte is much prettier. |
Its just an unfortunate dress for her. |
Both beautiful, but personally I prefer Kate's look. Damn, she's hot. |
|
She has gorgeous bone structure - those cheekbones could cut glass.
Smoking and living a hard life has not done well for her concerning aging, but then again I think similarly of Christie Brinkley - who looks too much like an embalmed version of herself.
Christy Turlington looks gorgeous to me, especially in no makeup - aged normally, and (relatively) healthfully. |
Nope, I have a skinny teenage son and the proportions are completely different. I know your thesis is her shape only speaks to gay male designers, but that’s bunk. If you were to measure hip to waist ratio, of KM, the geometry is as dramatic as some of the curvy examples cited. I’ve altered dresses, although a larger woman may look curvier the percent of fabric that has to be suppressed for a skinny woman to fit a waist is often greater. The saving grace is skinny women often don’t need a completely cinched waist to look proportionate. |
Nope, she is still shaped like a teenage boy. Maybe not your son but there are plenty of boys with that shape. We’ve all seen Kate in clothes. She has a boyish figure, including the small, almost nonexistent chest. You can try to bend it anyway you like but she looks like a teenage boy. You can try to find curves and call her curvy but she isn’t. She’s skinny, ribs showing and all. You want to believe skinny women have curves, they have don’t. But again, there is nothing wrong with that. Just own the shape and stop trying to make fetch happen. |
DP. Christ, you need a handful of Xanax, girl. |
|
I am so amused someone cites Sophia Vergara as an example of curvy - especially on the same list as generally thickset people like Ashley Graham, Beyonce and whatnot. Literally the only curvy part of Vergara's physique are her breasts. The rest of her body is as compliant with "white people" standards as any model (or at least it was before normal middle age hit).
|
And yet out of the two, Moss had a much more illustrious career and is much more of an icon than Porizkova ever was. I mean, there were literally thousands skinny white girls hitting the model market at the same time with Kate. And success smiled on her and not any other skinny white girl. There has to be a reason, don't you think? It's her face, not her body. Her body is forgettable by modeling standards, but the face is where it's at. It's the same thing with Natalia Vodianova - the secret is the face, never the body. |
DP. I agree with PP. It’s ludicrous to claim a skinny girl like KM has curves or is curvy in the sense that most people describe women’s bodies today. The skinny women’s brigade is the one that sounds mental when they try to convince everyone that she has anything other than a boyish figure. Her face is pretty and feminine though, which is more than I can say for the many super skinny, mannish women around nowadays. |
| The arguments over whether Kate Moss is curvy are bizarre to me. She is not “curvy” as the term is traditionally used (meaning large breasts and generous hips and thighs). However, as others have noted, her hip to waist ratio is very feminine. She has a tiny waste and flaring hips. Anyone who compares her to a teenage boy is not familiar with teenage boy anatomy. They do not have nipped in waists. |