Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:OK, who booked the tickets with Mom in front with 2 kids and dad behind chilling by himself on that plane ride? Why not do 2X2? Who buys those shoes? Who does all the childcare? You have to refuse to be the default if you don't want that to be the case. This is why I am choosing not to BF, so DH can do childcare too from early age. Otherwise - mom has boobs, she can soothe the baby better. Mom knows better how to feed the kid, which daycare to pick, which shoes to buy, which doctor to make an appointment with, how to keep kids happy on a plane ride. Daddy is happily a chopped liver, from the get go without having ever to pull his own weight. Um, no.
I largely agree with you--women need to insist that men step up.
I think a lot of women prefer to be the primary caregiver and derive a lot of their identity from this role, so while it's tiring, they don't insist on more equitable co-parenting.
The one place where I might disagree with you slightly is the breastfeeding. It is more challenging to coparent equally when breastfeeding, but I think it can be done. When I was pregnant, I heard from other couples that mom can breastfeed at night while dad does diaper change and puts the baby back to bed, so that's what we did. I think it just takes a serious discussion or three about expectations way before the first kid gets here. We had this discussion when talking about marriage--I was not willing to have kids unless we coparented pretty equally. So my husband knew from the outset that it had to be this way.
IMO, I don't think this is it. I think it's because moms want the best for their children, while a lot of men are fine with bare minimum effort. Sure, some moms want "perfection" and at times, it can be unreasonable, but I find many dads have the bare minimum threshold parenting style.
It's complex. "Wanting the best" seems to be a pretty elastic term - being a mommy martyr, one upping other moms and competitive parenting also can be framed as "wanting the best". My MIL gets up at 5 and squeezes fresh juice for DH's breakfast whenever we visit - hey, she wants the best, and that's the model of family he internalized (she had a full time job all along too). Then of course she spends the rest of the day guilt tripping him, but that's a separate thing.
I think unless you expect more, and hand things over, most of DHs don't feel motivated to step up from the bare minimum. If they are actually responsible for something and have space to learn, and yes, fail of fumble until they find their way, then they will step up. Otherwise "what do you want me to do?" with a tone. Don't book 3x1 seats, ever, both literally and metaphorically. 2x2, if you want DH involved. If not - it's ok too, just own your choices.
PP here... like I stated, some women do have unreasonable expectations, but there is a wide range between "unreasonable expectations" and "bare minimum effort", but a lot of the dads seem to parent on the "bare minimum threshold" end of the scale.
I would've booked 2x2, and this is what we do. But, I do think that some men will purposefully do a bad job so that the mom intervenes. Sure, the mom can let the dad struggle along, but as a mom, I don't want my kids to have to suffer ineptness or laziness of the parent who is supposed to be in charge.
I have a friend who was in this situation -- she was the bread winner, he was the sahp. He was inept, and she let him struggle along, but at some point, she had had enough. They are now divorced. How long are you supposed to let him struggle, and the kids right along with him?