|
Your parents are rude and I'd cut back ties with them.
But they probably think your dad should be giving you great gifts just like their dad is. Your mom's gifts are only half of the gift from your parents. |
| Curious if people with step-whatevers have the same approach (whatever that is) with time/attention/affection for these kids as they do with money. |
Not really. You're expecting too much from real humans. We live in the real world, not some fairy tale. OP was a grownup when her mom remarried. OP is now in her 40s. The stepkids are in their early 20s, for most practical purposes they're still kids. I wouldn't expect a stepparent in this circumstances to love me or treat me as generously as he or she would to their own children. Likewise I wouldn't expect an inheritance equal to theirs, if the stepparent was inclined to leave me any money. Likewise I wouldn't expect my mother to love the stepkids as much as she loved me. Just being practical and realistic about the situation. Nor is it a nuclear family. A nuclear family is mom, dad and the kids. Boom. That's it. |
The OP posted that her Dad died and her mother remarried as a widow. |
You make yourself look worse every time you post. Shame on you. You should have been raised better. |
Her dad is dead. He died when she was a teenager and her mom married the rich guy soon after that. |
OP was in college when mom remarried. OP is now 30, NOT 40. |
OP was in college when mom remarried. OP is now 30, NOT 40. The step sisters are the age or a little older than OP was when her mom married this man. |
DP here. I do not have step kids or parents. But if some day I do (hopefully I will not), I would never expect to be treated as a biological child or parent. And I would never leave money to step grandkids. Never. |
So she never lived with this man? I think it is crazy to expect the same treatment. If she had been raised in the same house, sure. But she was not. |
OP's dad died when she was a teenager and it seems when her mom remarried when she was in her 20s she didn't gain a father, she witnessed her mother become absorbed in her new family. That's rough. I think if OP mentioned that she didn't have a living father in the beginning it would be clear it isn't just about the material. |
|
I haven't read all the way through. Just wanted to say I don't blame you for not loving this arrangement and feeling hurt. Basically these gifts are the stepdad - and with him your mom - saying you count for less in their family. And yes of course the money is now THEIRS - plus it's not like he's buying them condos or some extraordinary gift; if he can afford two Macbooks he can probably afford three Macbooks. There's no reason I can think of not to treat you equally.
Just ask your mom what's up with this. Tell her you feel kind of crappy about it - or tell her however it does make you feel. Ask her what's going on. Also sorry. Family dynamics can be hard. |
No one is talking about leaving money. We are talking about gifts, trips and time. There is a reason why the term stepmonster exists. |
|
I would address the piece of it that is in your territory. You don’t get to decide how they spend their money but you can certainly refuse to listen to long descriptions of lavish gifts and family outings that you were excluded from.
“What kind of cases do you think Anastasia and Drizella would like for their new iPads?” “Mom, I know that you and Stepdad enjoy buying these generous gifts for my sisters, but I find it a bit hurtful to always be excluded so I’d rather not hear about it in detail. Enjoy your visit with them!” “We had so much fun in Paris!” “That’s nice. We look forward to your visit in February. The kids are excited to show you their new bikes!” |
| Another perspective -- my husband is the youngest of three kids. Not a blended family. The family got wealthier over time so my husband got more stuff than anyone else. He was the only one who got a car at 16, for example and the others were out of the house and on their own by then, with their own cars. I don't think his parents ever tried to keep things monetarily equal for all the kids - I think they just gave whatever they had to whoever was there and didn't think too much about tit for tat. All the kids got college paid for so i'm sure in their minds they were providing the necessities to all. I'm not justifying it as the correct behavior, but just a thought that it might not be just about the blended family aspect. |