I Miss Target!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know most Trans people are victims of crimes, not perpetrators of crime. You are a sheep, OP! Making something out of nothing.

I'm a sheep! Ha! That's really funny. According to this thread, you are in PC lockstep with the majority. Of course -- it's easier than thinking for yourself and realizing that yes, in fact, there is something really wrong here when men claim to be women, and vice versa.

I'm a PP, but not the one you're directly quoting.

Sorry, I think there's "something really wrong" with not having compassion for your fellow human beings. And for making your business what's between a person's legs when all they want to do is use the bathroom or try on clothes.

Oh, here we go. The "compassion" card. PC/ liberalisms favorite line. As though anyone who doesn't agree with you 100% lacks "compassion," and therefore, is lesser in opinion.

Here's the truth, PP: Again, there is no right I possess that "transgenders" are not also entitled to. But I do not have the right or the power to bend the laws of nature and reality to suit my desires, and neither do they -- "transgender," or not. The problem is, you are avoiding the main issue: Can an individual with male anatomy, male reproductive organs, male chromosomes, male DNA, a male bone structure, and male everything else actually be, in any sense, a woman?

The answer to that question is no, of course. "Transgenders" don't have the right to be what they cannot be, and neither does anyone else. Do they then have the right to be TREATED as something other than what they are? How ridiculous is that?

You clearly have no compassion. Treat people as they wish to be treated. It's very simple.

Oh, really now? Well, hold up the mirror, honey. You aren't exactly treating me "as I wish to be treated." How dare you say I have no compassion -- you have no idea who I am, or what I do, or what "compassion" looks like in my life. I guess your little maxim only applies to those who agree with you, or follow your trendy PC code of conduct?

[Anonymous]

Who tries things on at Target? Buy it in 3 sizes and return it on your next visit! Goodness, who has time to try things on when you can return stuff in less than a minute on your next visit???

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know most Trans people are victims of crimes, not perpetrators of crime. You are a sheep, OP! Making something out of nothing.

I'm a sheep! Ha! That's really funny. According to this thread, you are in PC lockstep with the majority. Of course -- it's easier than thinking for yourself and realizing that yes, in fact, there is something really wrong here when men claim to be women, and vice versa.

I'm a PP, but not the one you're directly quoting.

Sorry, I think there's "something really wrong" with not having compassion for your fellow human beings. And for making your business what's between a person's legs when all they want to do is use the bathroom or try on clothes.

Oh, here we go. The "compassion" card. PC/ liberalisms favorite line. As though anyone who doesn't agree with you 100% lacks "compassion," and therefore, is lesser in opinion.

Here's the truth, PP: Again, there is no right I possess that "transgenders" are not also entitled to. But I do not have the right or the power to bend the laws of nature and reality to suit my desires, and neither do they -- "transgender," or not. The problem is, you are avoiding the main issue: Can an individual with male anatomy, male reproductive organs, male chromosomes, male DNA, a male bone structure, and male everything else actually be, in any sense, a woman?

The answer to that question is no, of course. "Transgenders" don't have the right to be what they cannot be, and neither does anyone else. Do they then have the right to be TREATED as something other than what they are? How ridiculous is that?

You clearly have no compassion. Treat people as they wish to be treated. It's very simple.

Oh, really now? Well, hold up the mirror, honey. You aren't exactly treating me "as I wish to be treated." How dare you say I have no compassion -- you have no idea who I am, or what I do, or what "compassion" looks like in my life. I guess your little maxim only applies to those who agree with you, or follow your trendy PC code of conduct?

Who is not treating you as you wish to be treated? If your wish includes telling people where they can and can't go, sorry.

[Anonymous]

And it's not "trendy". It's the Golden Rule. Heard of it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The true creeps and criminals are not hiding in Target where there are cameras and good lighting. They are picking up your teens off the street, right of college campuses, after parties, and other areas where your teen is vulnerable.

He's not dumb enough to attack a group of loud girls in the middle of a store.

Yes, because creeps never come to the dressing room.
http://www.winchesterstar.com/article/022216br
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/1997-08-15/news/9708140778_1_leonard-gray-ross-dress-dressing-room

Creeps will enter whether they are allowed to or not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know most Trans people are victims of crimes, not perpetrators of crime. You are a sheep, OP! Making something out of nothing.

I'm a sheep! Ha! That's really funny. According to this thread, you are in PC lockstep with the majority. Of course -- it's easier than thinking for yourself and realizing that yes, in fact, there is something really wrong here when men claim to be women, and vice versa.

I'm a PP, but not the one you're directly quoting.

Sorry, I think there's "something really wrong" with not having compassion for your fellow human beings. And for making your business what's between a person's legs when all they want to do is use the bathroom or try on clothes.

Oh, here we go. The "compassion" card. PC/ liberalisms favorite line. As though anyone who doesn't agree with you 100% lacks "compassion," and therefore, is lesser in opinion.

Here's the truth, PP: Again, there is no right I possess that "transgenders" are not also entitled to. But I do not have the right or the power to bend the laws of nature and reality to suit my desires, and neither do they -- "transgender," or not. The problem is, you are avoiding the main issue: Can an individual with male anatomy, male reproductive organs, male chromosomes, male DNA, a male bone structure, and male everything else actually be, in any sense, a woman?

The answer to that question is no, of course. "Transgenders" don't have the right to be what they cannot be, and neither does anyone else. Do they then have the right to be TREATED as something other than what they are? How ridiculous is that?

You clearly have no compassion. Treat people as they wish to be treated. It's very simple.

Oh, really now? Well, hold up the mirror, honey. You aren't exactly treating me "as I wish to be treated." How dare you say I have no compassion -- you have no idea who I am, or what I do, or what "compassion" looks like in my life. I guess your little maxim only applies to those who agree with you, or follow your trendy PC code of conduct?

Who is not treating you as you wish to be treated? If your wish includes telling people where they can and can't go, sorry.

So, rules, signs, ordinances, etc mean absolutely nothing to you? If I have a "no trespassing sign" on my property, or "please don't pick the flowers," you would go right ahead and do so, and tell your kids it's fine to do so as well?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently op has a teen girl but she never shops at h and m, gap, Aeropostale, or any of the stores with unisex fitting rooms where all other teens shop.

Seriously

NP. Target seems different to me. Those other stores you mention are geared to a specific demographic and shopper. Target is literally for everyone.

What deli defense does any of this make?

Difference*

I"m not even going to guess what you mean by "deli difference," but...

It's different because stores like Aeropostale and Old Navy are geared to a specific consumer -- younger, urban hip, kids, etc. They don't have grandma-type clothes or infant/ toddler wear (at least at most of them.) So, specific people with specific needs shop there. Target made its name by appealing to everyone -- the oversized, young/ old, men/ women, etc. Why are they singling out a specific group to be made to feel more "comfortable," at the same time dismissing a much larger portion of their shoppers?

You're actually trying to convince people that Old Navy -- OLD NAVY -- is geared towards a hip, young, urban consumer? There is no substantive difference between a Target shopper and an Old Navy shopper. You're telling me that neither you nor your daughter has ever tried anything on in an Old Navy dressing room. I don't buy it.

Old Navy has a huge kid/toddler/baby section.
Wait, so you're afraid grandma is going to get molested at Target?

Hahaha. Old Navy is the furthest from urban, hip, and trendy that you can get.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know most Trans people are victims of crimes, not perpetrators of crime. You are a sheep, OP! Making something out of nothing.

I'm a sheep! Ha! That's really funny. According to this thread, you are in PC lockstep with the majority. Of course -- it's easier than thinking for yourself and realizing that yes, in fact, there is something really wrong here when men claim to be women, and vice versa.

I'm a PP, but not the one you're directly quoting.

Sorry, I think there's "something really wrong" with not having compassion for your fellow human beings. And for making your business what's between a person's legs when all they want to do is use the bathroom or try on clothes.

Oh, here we go. The "compassion" card. PC/ liberalisms favorite line. As though anyone who doesn't agree with you 100% lacks "compassion," and therefore, is lesser in opinion.

Here's the truth, PP: Again, there is no right I possess that "transgenders" are not also entitled to. But I do not have the right or the power to bend the laws of nature and reality to suit my desires, and neither do they -- "transgender," or not. The problem is, you are avoiding the main issue: Can an individual with male anatomy, male reproductive organs, male chromosomes, male DNA, a male bone structure, and male everything else actually be, in any sense, a woman?

The answer to that question is no, of course. "Transgenders" don't have the right to be what they cannot be, and neither does anyone else. Do they then have the right to be TREATED as something other than what they are? How ridiculous is that?

You clearly have no compassion. Treat people as they wish to be treated. It's very simple.

Oh, really now? Well, hold up the mirror, honey. You aren't exactly treating me "as I wish to be treated." How dare you say I have no compassion -- you have no idea who I am, or what I do, or what "compassion" looks like in my life. I guess your little maxim only applies to those who agree with you, or follow your trendy PC code of conduct?

Who is not treating you as you wish to be treated? If your wish includes telling people where they can and can't go, sorry.

So, rules, signs, ordinances, etc mean absolutely nothing to you? If I have a "no trespassing sign" on my property, or "please don't pick the flowers," you would go right ahead and do so, and tell your kids it's fine to do so as well?

Trespassing is a crime.

Entering a bathroom and changing room and minding your own business is not.

Get the difference?

[Anonymous]

*or changing room

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know most Trans people are victims of crimes, not perpetrators of crime. You are a sheep, OP! Making something out of nothing.

I'm a sheep! Ha! That's really funny. According to this thread, you are in PC lockstep with the majority. Of course -- it's easier than thinking for yourself and realizing that yes, in fact, there is something really wrong here when men claim to be women, and vice versa.

I'm a PP, but not the one you're directly quoting.

Sorry, I think there's "something really wrong" with not having compassion for your fellow human beings. And for making your business what's between a person's legs when all they want to do is use the bathroom or try on clothes.

Oh, here we go. The "compassion" card. PC/ liberalisms favorite line. As though anyone who doesn't agree with you 100% lacks "compassion," and therefore, is lesser in opinion.

Here's the truth, PP: Again, there is no right I possess that "transgenders" are not also entitled to. But I do not have the right or the power to bend the laws of nature and reality to suit my desires, and neither do they -- "transgender," or not. The problem is, you are avoiding the main issue: Can an individual with male anatomy, male reproductive organs, male chromosomes, male DNA, a male bone structure, and male everything else actually be, in any sense, a woman?

The answer to that question is no, of course. "Transgenders" don't have the right to be what they cannot be, and neither does anyone else. Do they then have the right to be TREATED as something other than what they are? How ridiculous is that?

You clearly have no compassion. Treat people as they wish to be treated. It's very simple.

Oh, really now? Well, hold up the mirror, honey. You aren't exactly treating me "as I wish to be treated." How dare you say I have no compassion -- you have no idea who I am, or what I do, or what "compassion" looks like in my life. I guess your little maxim only applies to those who agree with you, or follow your trendy PC code of conduct?

Who is not treating you as you wish to be treated? If your wish includes telling people where they can and can't go, sorry.

So, rules, signs, ordinances, etc mean absolutely nothing to you? If I have a "no trespassing sign" on my property, or "please don't pick the flowers," you would go right ahead and do so, and tell your kids it's fine to do so as well?

Trespassing is a crime.

Entering a bathroom and changing room and minding your own business is not.

Get the difference?

Absolutely untrue. Entering a public bathroom specifically designated for one gender -- if you are of the other gender -- is indeed a crime.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know most Trans people are victims of crimes, not perpetrators of crime. You are a sheep, OP! Making something out of nothing.

I'm a sheep! Ha! That's really funny. According to this thread, you are in PC lockstep with the majority. Of course -- it's easier than thinking for yourself and realizing that yes, in fact, there is something really wrong here when men claim to be women, and vice versa.

I'm a PP, but not the one you're directly quoting.

Sorry, I think there's "something really wrong" with not having compassion for your fellow human beings. And for making your business what's between a person's legs when all they want to do is use the bathroom or try on clothes.

Oh, here we go. The "compassion" card. PC/ liberalisms favorite line. As though anyone who doesn't agree with you 100% lacks "compassion," and therefore, is lesser in opinion.

Here's the truth, PP: Again, there is no right I possess that "transgenders" are not also entitled to. But I do not have the right or the power to bend the laws of nature and reality to suit my desires, and neither do they -- "transgender," or not. The problem is, you are avoiding the main issue: Can an individual with male anatomy, male reproductive organs, male chromosomes, male DNA, a male bone structure, and male everything else actually be, in any sense, a woman?

The answer to that question is no, of course. "Transgenders" don't have the right to be what they cannot be, and neither does anyone else. Do they then have the right to be TREATED as something other than what they are? How ridiculous is that?

You clearly have no compassion. Treat people as they wish to be treated. It's very simple.

Oh, really now? Well, hold up the mirror, honey. You aren't exactly treating me "as I wish to be treated." How dare you say I have no compassion -- you have no idea who I am, or what I do, or what "compassion" looks like in my life. I guess your little maxim only applies to those who agree with you, or follow your trendy PC code of conduct?

Who is not treating you as you wish to be treated? If your wish includes telling people where they can and can't go, sorry.

So, rules, signs, ordinances, etc mean absolutely nothing to you? If I have a "no trespassing sign" on my property, or "please don't pick the flowers," you would go right ahead and do so, and tell your kids it's fine to do so as well?

Trespassing is a crime.

Entering a bathroom and changing room and minding your own business is not.

Get the difference?

Absolutely untrue. Entering a public bathroom specifically designated for one gender -- if you are of the other gender -- is indeed a crime.

Not everywhere. And even where it is a 'crime' it's not enforced, because...how on Earth are the police going to enforce it?

[Anonymous]

The three Targets within a 10 mile radiance of my house have had unisex dressing rooms for several years. The dressing rooms are in between the women and men's sections.

[Anonymous]

I think we are ignoring the larger issue here. Target clothes have sucked for at least 5 years and no one should be trying them on anyway.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Bye Felicia!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think we are ignoring the larger issue here. Target clothes have sucked for at least 5 years and no one should be trying them on anyway.

I agree with you because I had given up, but I've put together 4 new outfits from there this spring season. I was amazed! Cute, simple, functional and versatile. My only gripe is that I wish they would standardize their colors a little better for layering, but other than that I've been pleasantly surprised.