I Miss Target!

[Anonymous]

There is no right I possess that "transgenders" are not also entitled to. But I do not have the right or the power to bend the laws of nature and reality to suit my desires, and neither do so-called transgenders.

[Anonymous]

You know most Trans people are victims of crimes, not perpetrators of crime. You are a sheep, OP! Making something out of nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't know, my experience with target dressing room attendants is that they have no trouble voicing their opinion. When I was 6 months pregnant, (and petite in size, and had maybe gained 10lbs at that point.) I took a stretchy maxi dress from the misses section in to try on and she attempted to shame/berate me for trying it on because shock horror, didn't I realize it wasn't from the maternity section?

Thanks for adding to the discussion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You know most Trans people are victims of crimes, not perpetrators of crime. You are a sheep, OP! Making something out of nothing.

I'm a sheep! Ha! That's really funny. According to this thread, you are in PC lockstep with the majority. Of course -- it's easier than thinking for yourself and realizing that yes, in fact, there is something really wrong here when men claim to be women, and vice versa.

[Anonymous]

Target in Burke was picked this morning. They had 8+ cashiers working and 3 or 4 customers in each line. I'm not too worried about their future.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know most Trans people are victims of crimes, not perpetrators of crime. You are a sheep, OP! Making something out of nothing.

I'm a sheep! Ha! That's really funny. According to this thread, you are in PC lockstep with the majority. Of course -- it's easier than thinking for yourself and realizing that yes, in fact, there is something really wrong here when men claim to be women, and vice versa.

I'm a PP, but not the one you're directly quoting.

Sorry, I think there's "something really wrong" with not having compassion for your fellow human beings. And for making your business what's between a person's legs when all they want to do is use the bathroom or try on clothes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently op has a teen girl but she never shops at h and m, gap, Aeropostale, or any of the stores with unisex fitting rooms where all other teens shop.

Seriously

NP. Target seems different to me. Those other stores you mention are geared to a specific demographic and shopper. Target is literally for everyone.

What deli defense does any of this make?

Difference*

I"m not even going to guess what you mean by "deli difference," but...

It's different because stores like Aeropostale and Old Navy are geared to a specific consumer -- younger, urban hip, kids, etc. They don't have grandma-type clothes or infant/ toddler wear (at least at most of them.) So, specific people with specific needs shop there. Target made its name by appealing to everyone -- the oversized, young/ old, men/ women, etc. Why are they singling out a specific group to be made to feel more "comfortable," at the same time dismissing a much larger portion of their shoppers?

You're actually trying to convince people that Old Navy -- OLD NAVY -- is geared towards a hip, young, urban consumer? There is no substantive difference between a Target shopper and an Old Navy shopper. You're telling me that neither you nor your daughter has ever tried anything on in an Old Navy dressing room. I don't buy it.

[Anonymous]

Wth?! H&M and Old Navy have hsd unisex fitting rooms forever, and it's never been an issue. Do you ban those stores too, OP? There are probably a lot more stores with unisex fitting rooms too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently op has a teen girl but she never shops at h and m, gap, Aeropostale, or any of the stores with unisex fitting rooms where all other teens shop.

Seriously

NP. Target seems different to me. Those other stores you mention are geared to a specific demographic and shopper. Target is literally for everyone.

What deli defense does any of this make?

Difference*

I"m not even going to guess what you mean by "deli difference," but...

It's different because stores like Aeropostale and Old Navy are geared to a specific consumer -- younger, urban hip, kids, etc. They don't have grandma-type clothes or infant/ toddler wear (at least at most of them.) So, specific people with specific needs shop there. Target made its name by appealing to everyone -- the oversized, young/ old, men/ women, etc. Why are they singling out a specific group to be made to feel more "comfortable," at the same time dismissing a much larger portion of their shoppers?

You're actually trying to convince people that Old Navy -- OLD NAVY -- is geared towards a hip, young, urban consumer? There is no substantive difference between a Target shopper and an Old Navy shopper. You're telling me that neither you nor your daughter has ever tried anything on in an Old Navy dressing room. I don't buy it.

Old Navy has a huge kid/toddler/baby section.
Wait, so you're afraid grandma is going to get molested at Target?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And Old Navy, too.

haven't the fitting rooms at the Target on Rte 50 always been unisex?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And Old Navy, too.

haven't the fitting rooms at the Target on Rte 50 always been unisex?

Not where I live.

As for Target, 20 plus years ago Target was a fun place to shop, not so much now. Plus the coffee smells in there made me sick. I don't shop anything progressive either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know most Trans people are victims of crimes, not perpetrators of crime. You are a sheep, OP! Making something out of nothing.

I'm a sheep! Ha! That's really funny. According to this thread, you are in PC lockstep with the majority. Of course -- it's easier than thinking for yourself and realizing that yes, in fact, there is something really wrong here when men claim to be women, and vice versa.

I'm a PP, but not the one you're directly quoting.

Sorry, I think there's "something really wrong" with not having compassion for your fellow human beings. And for making your business what's between a person's legs when all they want to do is use the bathroom or try on clothes.

Oh, here we go. The "compassion" card. PC/ liberalisms favorite line. As though anyone who doesn't agree with you 100% lacks "compassion," and therefore, is lesser in opinion.

Here's the truth, PP: Again, there is no right I possess that "transgenders" are not also entitled to. But I do not have the right or the power to bend the laws of nature and reality to suit my desires, and neither do they -- "transgender," or not. The problem is, you are avoiding the main issue: Can an individual with male anatomy, male reproductive organs, male chromosomes, male DNA, a male bone structure, and male everything else actually be, in any sense, a woman?

The answer to that question is no, of course. "Transgenders" don't have the right to be what they cannot be, and neither does anyone else. Do they then have the right to be TREATED as something other than what they are? How ridiculous is that?

[Anonymous]

You should be more concerned about a young boy in a men's room. There are more straight men who molest young boys out there than transgender people looking to molest children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know most Trans people are victims of crimes, not perpetrators of crime. You are a sheep, OP! Making something out of nothing.

I'm a sheep! Ha! That's really funny. According to this thread, you are in PC lockstep with the majority. Of course -- it's easier than thinking for yourself and realizing that yes, in fact, there is something really wrong here when men claim to be women, and vice versa.

I'm a PP, but not the one you're directly quoting.

Sorry, I think there's "something really wrong" with not having compassion for your fellow human beings. And for making your business what's between a person's legs when all they want to do is use the bathroom or try on clothes.

Oh, here we go. The "compassion" card. PC/ liberalisms favorite line. As though anyone who doesn't agree with you 100% lacks "compassion," and therefore, is lesser in opinion.

Here's the truth, PP: Again, there is no right I possess that "transgenders" are not also entitled to. But I do not have the right or the power to bend the laws of nature and reality to suit my desires, and neither do they -- "transgender," or not. The problem is, you are avoiding the main issue: Can an individual with male anatomy, male reproductive organs, male chromosomes, male DNA, a male bone structure, and male everything else actually be, in any sense, a woman?

The answer to that question is no, of course. "Transgenders" don't have the right to be what they cannot be, and neither does anyone else. Do they then have the right to be TREATED as something other than what they are? How ridiculous is that?

You clearly have no compassion. Treat people as they wish to be treated. It's very simple.

[Anonymous]

This, however is less simple. http://www.who.int/genomics/gender/en/index1.html