15 for the whole population. Apparently this is the top of the someones list and these STEM fields are grouped in ~1/2 of a std dev. On an individual test the margin for error is around +/- 3pts. Since the numbers above are averages the error should be less, but the std dev per field is probably still enough that there will be some biologists scoring above some physicists. A list like the one above is more about the lack of non STEM fields than comparing individuals within the fields listed. |
Nice try, but you have it backwards. You wouldn't have a job "managing" engineers (if that's what you do) if the engineers didn't design and build a good product. Engineers can do management better than (non-technical) managers can do engineering. Putting some MBA who doesn't know shit about designing and building things in charge of an engineering company is a recipe for disaster. |
I was going to write this...then I looked the date it was posted and realized I DID write this...two years ago. At least I'm consistent.
|