Leonardo DiCaprio is the best living actor

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Leo sucks as an actor. Not convincing in ANYTHING.

He's okay but always strikes me as callow, with limited emotional depth. Doesn't have great chemistry with other actors, never buy him as someone deeply in love, and certainly not a father. He was a far more interesting actor when very young.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Leo sucks as an actor. Not convincing in ANYTHING.

He's okay but always strikes me as callow, with limited emotional depth. Doesn't have great chemistry with other actors, never buy him as someone deeply in love, and certainly not a father. He was a far more interesting actor when very young.

Just say you're biased. You've made up your mind and that's that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Leo sucks as an actor. Not convincing in ANYTHING.

He's okay but always strikes me as callow, with limited emotional depth. Doesn't have great chemistry with other actors, never buy him as someone deeply in love, and certainly not a father. He was a far more interesting actor when very young.

Just say you're biased. You've made up your mind and that's that.

Having an opinion based on having seen much of his work is not "biased," sorry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Leo sucks as an actor. Not convincing in ANYTHING.

He's okay but always strikes me as callow, with limited emotional depth. Doesn't have great chemistry with other actors, never buy him as someone deeply in love, and certainly not a father. He was a far more interesting actor when very young.

Just say you're biased. You've made up your mind and that's that.

Having an opinion based on having seen much of his work is not "biased," sorry.

It's fine. I can't stand Will Smith because he's just Will Smith to me in every movie. Biases are hard to overcome.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I actually thought he was the weakest link in One Battle After Another.

Just watched this yesterday, and I agree. Do not understand why he was nominated. Jesse Plemmons gave a far stronger performance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Leo sucks as an actor. Not convincing in ANYTHING.

He's okay but always strikes me as callow, with limited emotional depth. Doesn't have great chemistry with other actors, never buy him as someone deeply in love, and certainly not a father. He was a far more interesting actor when very young.

Just say you're biased. You've made up your mind and that's that.

Having an opinion based on having seen much of his work is not "biased," sorry.

It's fine. I can't stand Will Smith because he's just Will Smith to me in every movie. Biases are hard to overcome.

I don’t think you know what “bias” means. Are you an adult?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Leo sucks as an actor. Not convincing in ANYTHING.

He's okay but always strikes me as callow, with limited emotional depth. Doesn't have great chemistry with other actors, never buy him as someone deeply in love, and certainly not a father. He was a far more interesting actor when very young.

Just say you're biased. You've made up your mind and that's that.

Having an opinion based on having seen much of his work is not "biased," sorry.

It's fine. I can't stand Will Smith because he's just Will Smith to me in every movie. Biases are hard to overcome.

I don’t think you know what “bias” means. Are you an adult?

Are you? Just because you don't like an actor doesn't mean they "suck".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Leo sucks as an actor. Not convincing in ANYTHING.

He's okay but always strikes me as callow, with limited emotional depth. Doesn't have great chemistry with other actors, never buy him as someone deeply in love, and certainly not a father. He was a far more interesting actor when very young.

Just say you're biased. You've made up your mind and that's that.

Having an opinion based on having seen much of his work is not "biased," sorry.

It's fine. I can't stand Will Smith because he's just Will Smith to me in every movie. Biases are hard to overcome.

I don’t think you know what “bias” means. Are you an adult?

Are you? Just because you don't like an actor doesn't mean they "suck".

I don’t think anyone has said that he sucks. Just that he’s overrated.

Either of which is a valid opinion; neither of which is “bias” - again, are you an actual adult? Did you take English in high school?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I so wish Heath Ledger was still alive. He was phenomenal.

He’s been work food for a while now. Whatever is the point of this response.

You're so charming.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gary Oldman.

Leo is fine but not as diverse.

Gary Oldman is amazing. He had one or maybe two scenes in Oppenheimer playing Harry Truman and he was so good. You forget it's him.

British actors are in a league of their own. Leo is similar to Brad Pitt and George Clooney--limited range.

I kept thinking of British actors:
Anthony Hopkins
Kenneth Branagh
Benedict Cumberbatch
David Tennant
Ben Kingsley

On the American side:
Dustin Hoffman!!! (I can’t believe he hasn’t been listed)
Meryl Streep
Tom Hanks
Jodie Foster
Morgan Freeman

This is a great list! I agree that Brad Pitt, Leo and George Clooney are pretty faces with limited talent.

Pitt isn’t the best of the bunch but don’t agree he doesn’t have range. Burn After, 12 Monkeys, Fight Club to name a few are all very different characters.

I loved his stoner in True Romance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Leo sucks as an actor. Not convincing in ANYTHING.

He's okay but always strikes me as callow, with limited emotional depth. Doesn't have great chemistry with other actors, never buy him as someone deeply in love, and certainly not a father. He was a far more interesting actor when very young.

Just say you're biased. You've made up your mind and that's that.

Having an opinion based on having seen much of his work is not "biased," sorry.

It's fine. I can't stand Will Smith because he's just Will Smith to me in every movie. Biases are hard to overcome.

I don’t think you know what “bias” means. Are you an adult?

Are you? Just because you don't like an actor doesn't mean they "suck".

I don’t think anyone has said that he sucks. Just that he’s overrated.

Either of which is a valid opinion; neither of which is “bias” - again, are you an actual adult? Did you take English in high school?

Ahem. It’s right at the top of the page. You can’t read and don’t know what words mean. Did you even get a GED?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Christian Bale is God's gift to acting and we are blessed to enjoy his craft. I do enjoy Leo, Ethan, Daniel and Gary too, but its not close.

I'm with you.

I do love Gary Oldman, Ralph Fiennes, Christoph Walz, Alan Rickman and so many others already mentioned.

[Anonymous]

I agree he's pretty good.
His performance as the autistic / delayed brother in What's Eating Gilbert Grape was something that overshadowed and apparently bothered Johnny Depp.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I agree he's pretty good.
His performance as the autistic / delayed brother in What's Eating Gilbert Grape was something that overshadowed and apparently bothered Johnny Depp.

Oh, and that scene from Wolf of Wall Street where he's drugged out and desperately crawling to his car from the club had me glued to the screen. A pretty dumb plot scene but he really has the audience. It's funny, pathetic, painful and you think he's an awful jerk but you're wanting him to get in that car.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Leo sucks as an actor. Not convincing in ANYTHING.

He's okay but always strikes me as callow, with limited emotional depth. Doesn't have great chemistry with other actors, never buy him as someone deeply in love, and certainly not a father. He was a far more interesting actor when very young.

Just say you're biased. You've made up your mind and that's that.

Having an opinion based on having seen much of his work is not "biased," sorry.

It's fine. I can't stand Will Smith because he's just Will Smith to me in every movie. Biases are hard to overcome.

I don’t think you know what “bias” means. Are you an adult?

Are you? Just because you don't like an actor doesn't mean they "suck".

I don’t think anyone has said that he sucks. Just that he’s overrated.

Either of which is a valid opinion; neither of which is “bias” - again, are you an actual adult? Did you take English in high school?

Ahem. It’s right at the top of the page. You can’t read and don’t know what words mean. Did you even get a GED?

It’s still not bias, dear. Just an opinion you don’t like. Sorry.