Leonardo DiCaprio is the best living actor

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m not sure if Leo is a good actor or is just really good at choosing roles, but the combo is always good.


This. I don't think he has the range of other actors and I don't always feel completely convinced. However, he does a very good job of choosing both roles and directors (made easier by the fact that almost anyone will work with him and he has his pick of roles) and tends to pick roles that play to his strengths in the kind of understated, naturalistic acting he does. For him, it's all in the nuance. Like in One Battle After Another, his character is a version of a character he's played before, but the nuance is that he's spent the last couple decades smoking a lot of weed. And he does a really good job in weaving this into the role and milking it for both drama and humor. But it's not virtuosic. I'm not, like, transported.

The broadest he's ever gone is that plantation owner in Django Unchained, and while it's a memorable performance, it's not his best work. He does much better sticking within a narrower range, but then really exploring the subtleties within that range.


His career has thrived for so long for a reason. It pains people to admit he’s a good actor and it’s not just that he picks roles and directors. A weaker actor would deliver more flops.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m not sure if Leo is a good actor or is just really good at choosing roles, but the combo is always good.


This. I don't think he has the range of other actors and I don't always feel completely convinced. However, he does a very good job of choosing both roles and directors (made easier by the fact that almost anyone will work with him and he has his pick of roles) and tends to pick roles that play to his strengths in the kind of understated, naturalistic acting he does. For him, it's all in the nuance. Like in One Battle After Another, his character is a version of a character he's played before, but the nuance is that he's spent the last couple decades smoking a lot of weed. And he does a really good job in weaving this into the role and milking it for both drama and humor. But it's not virtuosic. I'm not, like, transported.

The broadest he's ever gone is that plantation owner in Django Unchained, and while it's a memorable performance, it's not his best work. He does much better sticking within a narrower range, but then really exploring the subtleties within that range.


I know this was a looong time ago, but he was phenomenal in What's Eating Gilbert Grape - especially considering how young he was at the time. I don't know if the depiction of his character has stood the test of time, I haven't seen it in many years, but I remember being blown away by his performance.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m not sure if Leo is a good actor or is just really good at choosing roles, but the combo is always good.


This. I don't think he has the range of other actors and I don't always feel completely convinced. However, he does a very good job of choosing both roles and directors (made easier by the fact that almost anyone will work with him and he has his pick of roles) and tends to pick roles that play to his strengths in the kind of understated, naturalistic acting he does. For him, it's all in the nuance. Like in One Battle After Another, his character is a version of a character he's played before, but the nuance is that he's spent the last couple decades smoking a lot of weed. And he does a really good job in weaving this into the role and milking it for both drama and humor. But it's not virtuosic. I'm not, like, transported.

The broadest he's ever gone is that plantation owner in Django Unchained, and while it's a memorable performance, it's not his best work. He does much better sticking within a narrower range, but then really exploring the subtleties within that range.


I know this was a looong time ago, but he was phenomenal in What's Eating Gilbert Grape - especially considering how young he was at the time. I don't know if the depiction of his character has stood the test of time, I haven't seen it in many years, but I remember being blown away by his performance.


And Basketball Diaries, too.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m not sure if Leo is a good actor or is just really good at choosing roles, but the combo is always good.


This. I don't think he has the range of other actors and I don't always feel completely convinced. However, he does a very good job of choosing both roles and directors (made easier by the fact that almost anyone will work with him and he has his pick of roles) and tends to pick roles that play to his strengths in the kind of understated, naturalistic acting he does. For him, it's all in the nuance. Like in One Battle After Another, his character is a version of a character he's played before, but the nuance is that he's spent the last couple decades smoking a lot of weed. And he does a really good job in weaving this into the role and milking it for both drama and humor. But it's not virtuosic. I'm not, like, transported.

The broadest he's ever gone is that plantation owner in Django Unchained, and while it's a memorable performance, it's not his best work. He does much better sticking within a narrower range, but then really exploring the subtleties within that range.


I know this was a looong time ago, but he was phenomenal in What's Eating Gilbert Grape - especially considering how young he was at the time. I don't know if the depiction of his character has stood the test of time, I haven't seen it in many years, but I remember being blown away by his performance.


I loved that movie. I was just a kid when it came out and I remember knowing even then that his performance was something special.
Anonymous
Not even best actor of the past year. Michael B Jordan transported us in Sinners.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Gary Oldman.

Leo is fine but not as diverse.

Gary Oldman is amazing. He had one or maybe two scenes in Oppenheimer playing Harry Truman and he was so good. You forget it's him.


British actors are in a league of their own. Leo is similar to Brad Pitt and George Clooney--limited range.
Anonymous
Ralph Fiennes is up there
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m not sure if Leo is a good actor or is just really good at choosing roles, but the combo is always good.


This. I don't think he has the range of other actors and I don't always feel completely convinced. However, he does a very good job of choosing both roles and directors (made easier by the fact that almost anyone will work with him and he has his pick of roles) and tends to pick roles that play to his strengths in the kind of understated, naturalistic acting he does. For him, it's all in the nuance. Like in One Battle After Another, his character is a version of a character he's played before, but the nuance is that he's spent the last couple decades smoking a lot of weed. And he does a really good job in weaving this into the role and milking it for both drama and humor. But it's not virtuosic. I'm not, like, transported.

The broadest he's ever gone is that plantation owner in Django Unchained, and while it's a memorable performance, it's not his best work. He does much better sticking within a narrower range, but then really exploring the subtleties within that range.


I know this was a looong time ago, but he was phenomenal in What's Eating Gilbert Grape - especially considering how young he was at the time. I don't know if the depiction of his character has stood the test of time, I haven't seen it in many years, but I remember being blown away by his performance.


And Basketball Diaries, too.

Also This Boy's Life from that era.

He was great in The Departed and also in The Aviator which I hadn't expected to like. He made me feel sorry for Hughes because of his phobias. He had one scene where he showed how afraid he was and it was mesmerizing.
Anonymous
Meryl Strep is better.

Sharon Stone.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Gary Oldman.

Leo is fine but not as diverse.

Gary Oldman is amazing. He had one or maybe two scenes in Oppenheimer playing Harry Truman and he was so good. You forget it's him.


+1
And of course, his turn as Churchill. Incredible.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m not sure if Leo is a good actor or is just really good at choosing roles, but the combo is always good.


This. I don't think he has the range of other actors and I don't always feel completely convinced. However, he does a very good job of choosing both roles and directors (made easier by the fact that almost anyone will work with him and he has his pick of roles) and tends to pick roles that play to his strengths in the kind of understated, naturalistic acting he does. For him, it's all in the nuance. Like in One Battle After Another, his character is a version of a character he's played before, but the nuance is that he's spent the last couple decades smoking a lot of weed. And he does a really good job in weaving this into the role and milking it for both drama and humor. But it's not virtuosic. I'm not, like, transported.

The broadest he's ever gone is that plantation owner in Django Unchained, and while it's a memorable performance, it's not his best work. He does much better sticking within a narrower range, but then really exploring the subtleties within that range.


I know this was a looong time ago, but he was phenomenal in What's Eating Gilbert Grape - especially considering how young he was at the time. I don't know if the depiction of his character has stood the test of time, I haven't seen it in many years, but I remember being blown away by his performance.


+100
Was just going to say exactly this. I couldn't believe that performance. I think that was before he was a well-known actor (or known at all?) and I remember thinking this kid is a star for sure. I've always liked him, but haven't seen him in a role anywhere close to that one since.
Anonymous
I agree with whoever said Gary Oldman and Judi Dench. Yes, 200%, and it's not about the accents.
Anonymous
I thought he was a one hit wonder with titanic, now he’s just a doughy pudge. He needs to lay off the burgers.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I agree with whoever said Gary Oldman and Judi Dench. Yes, 200%, and it's not about the accents.


Dame Judi dench is the winner. Amazing. No comparison.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m not sure if Leo is a good actor or is just really good at choosing roles, but the combo is always good.


This. I don't think he has the range of other actors and I don't always feel completely convinced. However, he does a very good job of choosing both roles and directors (made easier by the fact that almost anyone will work with him and he has his pick of roles) and tends to pick roles that play to his strengths in the kind of understated, naturalistic acting he does. For him, it's all in the nuance. Like in One Battle After Another, his character is a version of a character he's played before, but the nuance is that he's spent the last couple decades smoking a lot of weed. And he does a really good job in weaving this into the role and milking it for both drama and humor. But it's not virtuosic. I'm not, like, transported.

The broadest he's ever gone is that plantation owner in Django Unchained, and while it's a memorable performance, it's not his best work. He does much better sticking within a narrower range, but then really exploring the subtleties within that range.


I know this was a looong time ago, but he was phenomenal in What's Eating Gilbert Grape - especially considering how young he was at the time. I don't know if the depiction of his character has stood the test of time, I haven't seen it in many years, but I remember being blown away by his performance.


+100
Was just going to say exactly this. I couldn't believe that performance. I think that was before he was a well-known actor (or known at all?) and I remember thinking this kid is a star for sure. I've always liked him, but haven't seen him in a role anywhere close to that one since.


What about The Revenant?
post reply Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Message Quick Reply
Go to: