Trump says troops are getting paid

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think that's legal.

It’s literally unconstitutional.

Congress has declined to assert its Article I authorities around spending, so I guess nothing matters anymore. Trump is our King, because a minority of people want that and the Electoral College allows them to decide.

Hyperbole, much?
Also, Trump win the popular vote as well. Your whining about the electoral college doesn’t help your argument because he didn’t need it. He would’ve been elected without it.

Trump did not win the majority of the popular vote. He only won a plurality, 49.8%, meaning most people who voted did not vote for him.

Moreover, he received votes from only 77 million people, meaning a mere 32% of eligible voters cast a ballot for him. If you consider the entire U.S. population, only 23% of people voted for him.

So, yes, a minority of people voted for Trump. Deal with it.

No one said he won a majority. He did what you admit win the popular vote. A lesser minority voted for your girl.

Yes, and most people didn’t vote for him and did not want him to be president. Why is that so triggering for you to admit?

So you admit again that he won the popular vote. More than the other candidates. Why is that so triggering for you to admit?

I have never contested that he won the popular vote. But you still refuse to accept that most people who voted didn’t vote for him and wanted a different candidate to win.

Not the pp, but you don’t have a point. He won the popular vote by over 2 million more votes than his opponent. It doesn’t matter if it’s plurality or majority. He won.

This conversation began because PP was mad that someone dare say a minority of people wanted the Trump presidency. But it’s a fact that only a minority of people wanted him to be president.

No, the conversation began because some tried to argue that he didn’t win popular vote by implying that it needed to be won by a majority rather than a plurality which is obviously wrong. Someone said he won the popular vote and another argued back that it was a plurality as if to say he didn’t win it.

No one argued he didn’t win the popular vote. Reread the thread. This began because someone (probably you) got pissy when it was pointed out that only a minority of people wanted Trump.

Why didn’t presumably you say that an even lesser number of people voted for Kamala? If not to deceive.

What does she have to do with whether only a minority of people voted for Trump? It’s true. Most people didn’t vote for him. They voted for someone else. He is not popular.

So unpopular that he won.

Yes, he won despite most people not voting for him and not wanting him to be president. When more than half of people go out of their way to say they do not want something, it is unpopular.

So unpopular that he won.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think that's legal.

It’s literally unconstitutional.

Congress has declined to assert its Article I authorities around spending, so I guess nothing matters anymore. Trump is our King, because a minority of people want that and the Electoral College allows them to decide.

Hyperbole, much?
Also, Trump win the popular vote as well. Your whining about the electoral college doesn’t help your argument because he didn’t need it. He would’ve been elected without it.

Trump did not win the majority of the popular vote. He only won a plurality, 49.8%, meaning most people who voted did not vote for him.

Moreover, he received votes from only 77 million people, meaning a mere 32% of eligible voters cast a ballot for him. If you consider the entire U.S. population, only 23% of people voted for him.

So, yes, a minority of people voted for Trump. Deal with it.

No one said he won a majority. He did what you admit win the popular vote. A lesser minority voted for your girl.

Yes, and most people didn’t vote for him and did not want him to be president. Why is that so triggering for you to admit?

So you admit again that he won the popular vote. More than the other candidates. Why is that so triggering for you to admit?

I have never contested that he won the popular vote. But you still refuse to accept that most people who voted didn’t vote for him and wanted a different candidate to win.

Not the pp, but you don’t have a point. He won the popular vote by over 2 million more votes than his opponent. It doesn’t matter if it’s plurality or majority. He won.

This conversation began because PP was mad that someone dare say a minority of people wanted the Trump presidency. But it’s a fact that only a minority of people wanted him to be president.

No, the conversation began because some tried to argue that he didn’t win popular vote by implying that it needed to be won by a majority rather than a plurality which is obviously wrong. Someone said he won the popular vote and another argued back that it was a plurality as if to say he didn’t win it.

No one argued he didn’t win the popular vote. Reread the thread. This began because someone (probably you) got pissy when it was pointed out that only a minority of people wanted Trump.

Wrong, the implication was that he lost the popular vote because it was only by a plurality. You know that was your intention in saying this.

That was never the implication, and I’ve said repeatedly that he won the popular vote despite most people voting for someone else. Do you have TDS?

Who is this “most people” who should be president? That’s what you are saying.

50.2% who voted in the 2024 election voted for someone other than Trump to be president. Therefore “most people” did not vote for Trump.

Trump is our President. Thank God.

And yet most people don’t agree with you.

Could care less. Troops getting paid thanks to Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think that's legal.

It’s literally unconstitutional.

Congress has declined to assert its Article I authorities around spending, so I guess nothing matters anymore. Trump is our King, because a minority of people want that and the Electoral College allows them to decide.

Hyperbole, much?
Also, Trump win the popular vote as well. Your whining about the electoral college doesn’t help your argument because he didn’t need it. He would’ve been elected without it.

Trump did not win the majority of the popular vote. He only won a plurality, 49.8%, meaning most people who voted did not vote for him.

Moreover, he received votes from only 77 million people, meaning a mere 32% of eligible voters cast a ballot for him. If you consider the entire U.S. population, only 23% of people voted for him.

So, yes, a minority of people voted for Trump. Deal with it.

No one said he won a majority. He did what you admit win the popular vote. A lesser minority voted for your girl.

Yes, and most people didn’t vote for him and did not want him to be president. Why is that so triggering for you to admit?

So you admit again that he won the popular vote. More than the other candidates. Why is that so triggering for you to admit?

I have never contested that he won the popular vote. But you still refuse to accept that most people who voted didn’t vote for him and wanted a different candidate to win.

Not the pp, but you don’t have a point. He won the popular vote by over 2 million more votes than his opponent. It doesn’t matter if it’s plurality or majority. He won.

This conversation began because PP was mad that someone dare say a minority of people wanted the Trump presidency. But it’s a fact that only a minority of people wanted him to be president.

No, the conversation began because some tried to argue that he didn’t win popular vote by implying that it needed to be won by a majority rather than a plurality which is obviously wrong. Someone said he won the popular vote and another argued back that it was a plurality as if to say he didn’t win it.

No one argued he didn’t win the popular vote. Reread the thread. This began because someone (probably you) got pissy when it was pointed out that only a minority of people wanted Trump.

Wrong, the implication was that he lost the popular vote because it was only by a plurality. You know that was your intention in saying this.

That was never the implication, and I’ve said repeatedly that he won the popular vote despite most people voting for someone else. Do you have TDS?

Who is this “most people” who should be president? That’s what you are saying.

50.2% who voted in the 2024 election voted for someone other than Trump to be president. Therefore “most people” did not vote for Trump.

Trump is our President. Thank God.

And yet most people don’t agree with you.

Trump is your president because the people spoke. Your agreement was not asked.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think that's legal.

It’s literally unconstitutional.

Congress has declined to assert its Article I authorities around spending, so I guess nothing matters anymore. Trump is our King, because a minority of people want that and the Electoral College allows them to decide.

Hyperbole, much?
Also, Trump win the popular vote as well. Your whining about the electoral college doesn’t help your argument because he didn’t need it. He would’ve been elected without it.

Trump did not win the majority of the popular vote. He only won a plurality, 49.8%, meaning most people who voted did not vote for him.

Moreover, he received votes from only 77 million people, meaning a mere 32% of eligible voters cast a ballot for him. If you consider the entire U.S. population, only 23% of people voted for him.

So, yes, a minority of people voted for Trump. Deal with it.

No one said he won a majority. He did what you admit win the popular vote. A lesser minority voted for your girl.

Yes, and most people didn’t vote for him and did not want him to be president. Why is that so triggering for you to admit?

So you admit again that he won the popular vote. More than the other candidates. Why is that so triggering for you to admit?

I have never contested that he won the popular vote. But you still refuse to accept that most people who voted didn’t vote for him and wanted a different candidate to win.

Not the pp, but you don’t have a point. He won the popular vote by over 2 million more votes than his opponent. It doesn’t matter if it’s plurality or majority. He won.

This conversation began because PP was mad that someone dare say a minority of people wanted the Trump presidency. But it’s a fact that only a minority of people wanted him to be president.

No, the conversation began because some tried to argue that he didn’t win popular vote by implying that it needed to be won by a majority rather than a plurality which is obviously wrong. Someone said he won the popular vote and another argued back that it was a plurality as if to say he didn’t win it.

No one argued he didn’t win the popular vote. Reread the thread. This began because someone (probably you) got pissy when it was pointed out that only a minority of people wanted Trump.

Wrong, the implication was that he lost the popular vote because it was only by a plurality. You know that was your intention in saying this.

That was never the implication, and I’ve said repeatedly that he won the popular vote despite most people voting for someone else. Do you have TDS?

Who is this “most people” who should be president? That’s what you are saying.

50.2% who voted in the 2024 election voted for someone other than Trump to be president. Therefore “most people” did not vote for Trump.

Trump is our President. Thank God.

And yet most people don’t agree with you.

Could care less. Troops getting paid thanks to Trump.

Someone who doesn’t care but posted two dozen times trying to get the last word? (Let me guess, your next post will claim that was someone else and you’ve never posted before!)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think that's legal.

It’s literally unconstitutional.

Congress has declined to assert its Article I authorities around spending, so I guess nothing matters anymore. Trump is our King, because a minority of people want that and the Electoral College allows them to decide.

Hyperbole, much?
Also, Trump win the popular vote as well. Your whining about the electoral college doesn’t help your argument because he didn’t need it. He would’ve been elected without it.

Trump did not win the majority of the popular vote. He only won a plurality, 49.8%, meaning most people who voted did not vote for him.

Moreover, he received votes from only 77 million people, meaning a mere 32% of eligible voters cast a ballot for him. If you consider the entire U.S. population, only 23% of people voted for him.

So, yes, a minority of people voted for Trump. Deal with it.

No one said he won a majority. He did what you admit win the popular vote. A lesser minority voted for your girl.

Yes, and most people didn’t vote for him and did not want him to be president. Why is that so triggering for you to admit?

So you admit again that he won the popular vote. More than the other candidates. Why is that so triggering for you to admit?

I have never contested that he won the popular vote. But you still refuse to accept that most people who voted didn’t vote for him and wanted a different candidate to win.

Not the pp, but you don’t have a point. He won the popular vote by over 2 million more votes than his opponent. It doesn’t matter if it’s plurality or majority. He won.

This conversation began because PP was mad that someone dare say a minority of people wanted the Trump presidency. But it’s a fact that only a minority of people wanted him to be president.

No, the conversation began because some tried to argue that he didn’t win popular vote by implying that it needed to be won by a majority rather than a plurality which is obviously wrong. Someone said he won the popular vote and another argued back that it was a plurality as if to say he didn’t win it.

No one argued he didn’t win the popular vote. Reread the thread. This began because someone (probably you) got pissy when it was pointed out that only a minority of people wanted Trump.

Wrong, the implication was that he lost the popular vote because it was only by a plurality. You know that was your intention in saying this.

That was never the implication, and I’ve said repeatedly that he won the popular vote despite most people voting for someone else. Do you have TDS?

Who is this “most people” who should be president? That’s what you are saying.

50.2% who voted in the 2024 election voted for someone other than Trump to be president. Therefore “most people” did not vote for Trump.

Trump is our President. Thank God.

And yet most people don’t agree with you.

Trump is your president because the people spoke. Your agreement was not asked.

Yes. 50.2% of people spoke and said they didn’t want Trump to be the president. I don’t know why you’re acting like this is something I don’t agree on. He won the election. But most people voted for someone else. That is all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think that's legal.

It’s literally unconstitutional.

Congress has declined to assert its Article I authorities around spending, so I guess nothing matters anymore. Trump is our King, because a minority of people want that and the Electoral College allows them to decide.

Hyperbole, much?
Also, Trump win the popular vote as well. Your whining about the electoral college doesn’t help your argument because he didn’t need it. He would’ve been elected without it.

Trump did not win the majority of the popular vote. He only won a plurality, 49.8%, meaning most people who voted did not vote for him.

Moreover, he received votes from only 77 million people, meaning a mere 32% of eligible voters cast a ballot for him. If you consider the entire U.S. population, only 23% of people voted for him.

So, yes, a minority of people voted for Trump. Deal with it.

No one said he won a majority. He did what you admit win the popular vote. A lesser minority voted for your girl.

Yes, and most people didn’t vote for him and did not want him to be president. Why is that so triggering for you to admit?

So you admit again that he won the popular vote. More than the other candidates. Why is that so triggering for you to admit?

I have never contested that he won the popular vote. But you still refuse to accept that most people who voted didn’t vote for him and wanted a different candidate to win.

Not the pp, but you don’t have a point. He won the popular vote by over 2 million more votes than his opponent. It doesn’t matter if it’s plurality or majority. He won.

This conversation began because PP was mad that someone dare say a minority of people wanted the Trump presidency. But it’s a fact that only a minority of people wanted him to be president.

No, the conversation began because some tried to argue that he didn’t win popular vote by implying that it needed to be won by a majority rather than a plurality which is obviously wrong. Someone said he won the popular vote and another argued back that it was a plurality as if to say he didn’t win it.

No one argued he didn’t win the popular vote. Reread the thread. This began because someone (probably you) got pissy when it was pointed out that only a minority of people wanted Trump.

Why didn’t presumably you say that an even lesser number of people voted for Kamala? If not to deceive.

What does she have to do with whether only a minority of people voted for Trump? It’s true. Most people didn’t vote for him. They voted for someone else. He is not popular.

So unpopular that he won.

Yes, he won despite most people not voting for him and not wanting him to be president. When more than half of people go out of their way to say they do not want something, it is unpopular.

He was wanted for president more than anyone else in the country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think that's legal.

It’s literally unconstitutional.

Congress has declined to assert its Article I authorities around spending, so I guess nothing matters anymore. Trump is our King, because a minority of people want that and the Electoral College allows them to decide.

Hyperbole, much?
Also, Trump win the popular vote as well. Your whining about the electoral college doesn’t help your argument because he didn’t need it. He would’ve been elected without it.

Trump did not win the majority of the popular vote. He only won a plurality, 49.8%, meaning most people who voted did not vote for him.

Moreover, he received votes from only 77 million people, meaning a mere 32% of eligible voters cast a ballot for him. If you consider the entire U.S. population, only 23% of people voted for him.

So, yes, a minority of people voted for Trump. Deal with it.

No one said he won a majority. He did what you admit win the popular vote. A lesser minority voted for your girl.

Yes, and most people didn’t vote for him and did not want him to be president. Why is that so triggering for you to admit?

So you admit again that he won the popular vote. More than the other candidates. Why is that so triggering for you to admit?

I have never contested that he won the popular vote. But you still refuse to accept that most people who voted didn’t vote for him and wanted a different candidate to win.

Not the pp, but you don’t have a point. He won the popular vote by over 2 million more votes than his opponent. It doesn’t matter if it’s plurality or majority. He won.

This conversation began because PP was mad that someone dare say a minority of people wanted the Trump presidency. But it’s a fact that only a minority of people wanted him to be president.

No, the conversation began because some tried to argue that he didn’t win popular vote by implying that it needed to be won by a majority rather than a plurality which is obviously wrong. Someone said he won the popular vote and another argued back that it was a plurality as if to say he didn’t win it.

No one argued he didn’t win the popular vote. Reread the thread. This began because someone (probably you) got pissy when it was pointed out that only a minority of people wanted Trump.

Wrong, the implication was that he lost the popular vote because it was only by a plurality. You know that was your intention in saying this.

That was never the implication, and I’ve said repeatedly that he won the popular vote despite most people voting for someone else. Do you have TDS?

Who is this “most people” who should be president? That’s what you are saying.

50.2% who voted in the 2024 election voted for someone other than Trump to be president. Therefore “most people” did not vote for Trump.

Trump is our President. Thank God.

And yet most people don’t agree with you.

Trump is your president because the people spoke. Your agreement was not asked.

Yes. 50.2% of people spoke and said they didn’t want Trump to be the president. I don’t know why you’re acting like this is something I don’t agree on. He won the election. But most people voted for someone else. That is all.

Who is this someone else?

[Anonymous]

Thanks to Trump the active military members will be paid next week.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think that's legal.

It’s literally unconstitutional.

Congress has declined to assert its Article I authorities around spending, so I guess nothing matters anymore. Trump is our King, because a minority of people want that and the Electoral College allows them to decide.

Hyperbole, much?
Also, Trump win the popular vote as well. Your whining about the electoral college doesn’t help your argument because he didn’t need it. He would’ve been elected without it.

Trump did not win the majority of the popular vote. He only won a plurality, 49.8%, meaning most people who voted did not vote for him.

Moreover, he received votes from only 77 million people, meaning a mere 32% of eligible voters cast a ballot for him. If you consider the entire U.S. population, only 23% of people voted for him.

So, yes, a minority of people voted for Trump. Deal with it.

No one said he won a majority. He did what you admit win the popular vote. A lesser minority voted for your girl.

Yes, and most people didn’t vote for him and did not want him to be president. Why is that so triggering for you to admit?

So you admit again that he won the popular vote. More than the other candidates. Why is that so triggering for you to admit?

I have never contested that he won the popular vote. But you still refuse to accept that most people who voted didn’t vote for him and wanted a different candidate to win.

Not the pp, but you don’t have a point. He won the popular vote by over 2 million more votes than his opponent. It doesn’t matter if it’s plurality or majority. He won.

This conversation began because PP was mad that someone dare say a minority of people wanted the Trump presidency. But it’s a fact that only a minority of people wanted him to be president.

No, the conversation began because some tried to argue that he didn’t win popular vote by implying that it needed to be won by a majority rather than a plurality which is obviously wrong. Someone said he won the popular vote and another argued back that it was a plurality as if to say he didn’t win it.

No one argued he didn’t win the popular vote. Reread the thread. This began because someone (probably you) got pissy when it was pointed out that only a minority of people wanted Trump.

Wrong, the implication was that he lost the popular vote because it was only by a plurality. You know that was your intention in saying this.

That was never the implication, and I’ve said repeatedly that he won the popular vote despite most people voting for someone else. Do you have TDS?

Who is this “most people” who should be president? That’s what you are saying.

50.2% who voted in the 2024 election voted for someone other than Trump to be president. Therefore “most people” did not vote for Trump.

Trump is our President. Thank God.

And yet most people don’t agree with you.

Trump is your president because the people spoke. Your agreement was not asked.

Yes. 50.2% of people spoke and said they didn’t want Trump to be the president. I don’t know why you’re acting like this is something I don’t agree on. He won the election. But most people voted for someone else. That is all.

Who is this someone else?

Any other candidate not named Trump. 50.2% of voters cast their ballot for a different candidate. Thus most people didn’t vote for him. They voted for someone else. They didn’t want him to be president.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think that's legal.

It’s literally unconstitutional.

Congress has declined to assert its Article I authorities around spending, so I guess nothing matters anymore. Trump is our King, because a minority of people want that and the Electoral College allows them to decide.

Hyperbole, much?
Also, Trump win the popular vote as well. Your whining about the electoral college doesn’t help your argument because he didn’t need it. He would’ve been elected without it.

Trump did not win the majority of the popular vote. He only won a plurality, 49.8%, meaning most people who voted did not vote for him.

Moreover, he received votes from only 77 million people, meaning a mere 32% of eligible voters cast a ballot for him. If you consider the entire U.S. population, only 23% of people voted for him.

So, yes, a minority of people voted for Trump. Deal with it.

No one said he won a majority. He did what you admit win the popular vote. A lesser minority voted for your girl.

Yes, and most people didn’t vote for him and did not want him to be president. Why is that so triggering for you to admit?

So you admit again that he won the popular vote. More than the other candidates. Why is that so triggering for you to admit?

I have never contested that he won the popular vote. But you still refuse to accept that most people who voted didn’t vote for him and wanted a different candidate to win.

Not the pp, but you don’t have a point. He won the popular vote by over 2 million more votes than his opponent. It doesn’t matter if it’s plurality or majority. He won.

This conversation began because PP was mad that someone dare say a minority of people wanted the Trump presidency. But it’s a fact that only a minority of people wanted him to be president.

No, the conversation began because some tried to argue that he didn’t win popular vote by implying that it needed to be won by a majority rather than a plurality which is obviously wrong. Someone said he won the popular vote and another argued back that it was a plurality as if to say he didn’t win it.

No one argued he didn’t win the popular vote. Reread the thread. This began because someone (probably you) got pissy when it was pointed out that only a minority of people wanted Trump.

Wrong, the implication was that he lost the popular vote because it was only by a plurality. You know that was your intention in saying this.

That was never the implication, and I’ve said repeatedly that he won the popular vote despite most people voting for someone else. Do you have TDS?

Who is this “most people” who should be president? That’s what you are saying.

50.2% who voted in the 2024 election voted for someone other than Trump to be president. Therefore “most people” did not vote for Trump.

Trump is our President. Thank God.

And yet most people don’t agree with you.

Trump is your president because the people spoke. Your agreement was not asked.

Yes. 50.2% of people spoke and said they didn’t want Trump to be the president. I don’t know why you’re acting like this is something I don’t agree on. He won the election. But most people voted for someone else. That is all.

Honey, he won the popular vote by damn near 50%. He didn’t need the majority. It was more than anyone else combined. He also won the electoral. Your “most wanted someone else” is not relevant or needed for him to have won. He won no matter how you try to twist it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think that's legal.

It’s literally unconstitutional.

Congress has declined to assert its Article I authorities around spending, so I guess nothing matters anymore. Trump is our King, because a minority of people want that and the Electoral College allows them to decide.

Hyperbole, much?
Also, Trump win the popular vote as well. Your whining about the electoral college doesn’t help your argument because he didn’t need it. He would’ve been elected without it.

Trump did not win the majority of the popular vote. He only won a plurality, 49.8%, meaning most people who voted did not vote for him.

Moreover, he received votes from only 77 million people, meaning a mere 32% of eligible voters cast a ballot for him. If you consider the entire U.S. population, only 23% of people voted for him.

So, yes, a minority of people voted for Trump. Deal with it.

No one said he won a majority. He did what you admit win the popular vote. A lesser minority voted for your girl.

Yes, and most people didn’t vote for him and did not want him to be president. Why is that so triggering for you to admit?

So you admit again that he won the popular vote. More than the other candidates. Why is that so triggering for you to admit?

I have never contested that he won the popular vote. But you still refuse to accept that most people who voted didn’t vote for him and wanted a different candidate to win.

Not the pp, but you don’t have a point. He won the popular vote by over 2 million more votes than his opponent. It doesn’t matter if it’s plurality or majority. He won.

This conversation began because PP was mad that someone dare say a minority of people wanted the Trump presidency. But it’s a fact that only a minority of people wanted him to be president.

No, the conversation began because some tried to argue that he didn’t win popular vote by implying that it needed to be won by a majority rather than a plurality which is obviously wrong. Someone said he won the popular vote and another argued back that it was a plurality as if to say he didn’t win it.

No one argued he didn’t win the popular vote. Reread the thread. This began because someone (probably you) got pissy when it was pointed out that only a minority of people wanted Trump.

Wrong, the implication was that he lost the popular vote because it was only by a plurality. You know that was your intention in saying this.

That was never the implication, and I’ve said repeatedly that he won the popular vote despite most people voting for someone else. Do you have TDS?

Who is this “most people” who should be president? That’s what you are saying.

50.2% who voted in the 2024 election voted for someone other than Trump to be president. Therefore “most people” did not vote for Trump.

Trump is our President. Thank God.

And yet most people don’t agree with you.

Trump is your president because the people spoke. Your agreement was not asked.

Yes. 50.2% of people spoke and said they didn’t want Trump to be the president. I don’t know why you’re acting like this is something I don’t agree on. He won the election. But most people voted for someone else. That is all.

Who is this someone else?

Any other candidate not named Trump. 50.2% of voters cast their ballot for a different candidate. Thus most people didn’t vote for him. They voted for someone else. They didn’t want him to be president.

So, all these other candidates won is what you are saying. They each got more votes.
Say that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think that's legal.

It’s literally unconstitutional.

Congress has declined to assert its Article I authorities around spending, so I guess nothing matters anymore. Trump is our King, because a minority of people want that and the Electoral College allows them to decide.

Hyperbole, much?
Also, Trump win the popular vote as well. Your whining about the electoral college doesn’t help your argument because he didn’t need it. He would’ve been elected without it.

Trump did not win the majority of the popular vote. He only won a plurality, 49.8%, meaning most people who voted did not vote for him.

Moreover, he received votes from only 77 million people, meaning a mere 32% of eligible voters cast a ballot for him. If you consider the entire U.S. population, only 23% of people voted for him.

So, yes, a minority of people voted for Trump. Deal with it.

No one said he won a majority. He did what you admit win the popular vote. A lesser minority voted for your girl.

Yes, and most people didn’t vote for him and did not want him to be president. Why is that so triggering for you to admit?

So you admit again that he won the popular vote. More than the other candidates. Why is that so triggering for you to admit?

I have never contested that he won the popular vote. But you still refuse to accept that most people who voted didn’t vote for him and wanted a different candidate to win.

Not the pp, but you don’t have a point. He won the popular vote by over 2 million more votes than his opponent. It doesn’t matter if it’s plurality or majority. He won.

This conversation began because PP was mad that someone dare say a minority of people wanted the Trump presidency. But it’s a fact that only a minority of people wanted him to be president.

No, the conversation began because some tried to argue that he didn’t win popular vote by implying that it needed to be won by a majority rather than a plurality which is obviously wrong. Someone said he won the popular vote and another argued back that it was a plurality as if to say he didn’t win it.

No one argued he didn’t win the popular vote. Reread the thread. This began because someone (probably you) got pissy when it was pointed out that only a minority of people wanted Trump.

Wrong, the implication was that he lost the popular vote because it was only by a plurality. You know that was your intention in saying this.

That was never the implication, and I’ve said repeatedly that he won the popular vote despite most people voting for someone else. Do you have TDS?

Who is this “most people” who should be president? That’s what you are saying.

50.2% who voted in the 2024 election voted for someone other than Trump to be president. Therefore “most people” did not vote for Trump.

Trump is our President. Thank God.

And yet most people don’t agree with you.

Trump is your president because the people spoke. Your agreement was not asked.

Yes. 50.2% of people spoke and said they didn’t want Trump to be the president. I don’t know why you’re acting like this is something I don’t agree on. He won the election. But most people voted for someone else. That is all.

Who is this someone else?

Any other candidate not named Trump. 50.2% of voters cast their ballot for a different candidate. Thus most people didn’t vote for him. They voted for someone else. They didn’t want him to be president.

They wanted him more than anyone else. Suck it.

[Anonymous]

Why do you egg heads care if the military gets paid?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think that's legal.

It’s literally unconstitutional.

Congress has declined to assert its Article I authorities around spending, so I guess nothing matters anymore. Trump is our King, because a minority of people want that and the Electoral College allows them to decide.

Hyperbole, much?
Also, Trump win the popular vote as well. Your whining about the electoral college doesn’t help your argument because he didn’t need it. He would’ve been elected without it.

Trump did not win the majority of the popular vote. He only won a plurality, 49.8%, meaning most people who voted did not vote for him.

Moreover, he received votes from only 77 million people, meaning a mere 32% of eligible voters cast a ballot for him. If you consider the entire U.S. population, only 23% of people voted for him.

So, yes, a minority of people voted for Trump. Deal with it.

No one said he won a majority. He did what you admit win the popular vote. A lesser minority voted for your girl.

Yes, and most people didn’t vote for him and did not want him to be president. Why is that so triggering for you to admit?

So you admit again that he won the popular vote. More than the other candidates. Why is that so triggering for you to admit?

I have never contested that he won the popular vote. But you still refuse to accept that most people who voted didn’t vote for him and wanted a different candidate to win.

Not the pp, but you don’t have a point. He won the popular vote by over 2 million more votes than his opponent. It doesn’t matter if it’s plurality or majority. He won.

This conversation began because PP was mad that someone dare say a minority of people wanted the Trump presidency. But it’s a fact that only a minority of people wanted him to be president.

No, the conversation began because some tried to argue that he didn’t win popular vote by implying that it needed to be won by a majority rather than a plurality which is obviously wrong. Someone said he won the popular vote and another argued back that it was a plurality as if to say he didn’t win it.

No one argued he didn’t win the popular vote. Reread the thread. This began because someone (probably you) got pissy when it was pointed out that only a minority of people wanted Trump.

Wrong, the implication was that he lost the popular vote because it was only by a plurality. You know that was your intention in saying this.

That was never the implication, and I’ve said repeatedly that he won the popular vote despite most people voting for someone else. Do you have TDS?

Who is this “most people” who should be president? That’s what you are saying.

50.2% who voted in the 2024 election voted for someone other than Trump to be president. Therefore “most people” did not vote for Trump.

Trump is our President. Thank God.

And yet most people don’t agree with you.

Trump is your president because the people spoke. Your agreement was not asked.

Yes. 50.2% of people spoke and said they didn’t want Trump to be the president. I don’t know why you’re acting like this is something I don’t agree on. He won the election. But most people voted for someone else. That is all.

Honey, he won the popular vote by damn near 50%. He didn’t need the majority. It was more than anyone else combined. He also won the electoral. Your “most wanted someone else” is not relevant or needed for him to have won. He won no matter how you try to twist it.

Once again, this conversation began with your insistence that it was wrong to say a minority of people wanted Trump. But that doesn’t change the truth. Trump has no mandate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think that's legal.

It’s literally unconstitutional.

Congress has declined to assert its Article I authorities around spending, so I guess nothing matters anymore. Trump is our King, because a minority of people want that and the Electoral College allows them to decide.

Hyperbole, much?
Also, Trump win the popular vote as well. Your whining about the electoral college doesn’t help your argument because he didn’t need it. He would’ve been elected without it.

Trump did not win the majority of the popular vote. He only won a plurality, 49.8%, meaning most people who voted did not vote for him.

Moreover, he received votes from only 77 million people, meaning a mere 32% of eligible voters cast a ballot for him. If you consider the entire U.S. population, only 23% of people voted for him.

So, yes, a minority of people voted for Trump. Deal with it.

No one said he won a majority. He did what you admit win the popular vote. A lesser minority voted for your girl.

Yes, and most people didn’t vote for him and did not want him to be president. Why is that so triggering for you to admit?

So you admit again that he won the popular vote. More than the other candidates. Why is that so triggering for you to admit?

I have never contested that he won the popular vote. But you still refuse to accept that most people who voted didn’t vote for him and wanted a different candidate to win.

Not the pp, but you don’t have a point. He won the popular vote by over 2 million more votes than his opponent. It doesn’t matter if it’s plurality or majority. He won.

This conversation began because PP was mad that someone dare say a minority of people wanted the Trump presidency. But it’s a fact that only a minority of people wanted him to be president.

No, the conversation began because some tried to argue that he didn’t win popular vote by implying that it needed to be won by a majority rather than a plurality which is obviously wrong. Someone said he won the popular vote and another argued back that it was a plurality as if to say he didn’t win it.

No one argued he didn’t win the popular vote. Reread the thread. This began because someone (probably you) got pissy when it was pointed out that only a minority of people wanted Trump.

Wrong, the implication was that he lost the popular vote because it was only by a plurality. You know that was your intention in saying this.

That was never the implication, and I’ve said repeatedly that he won the popular vote despite most people voting for someone else. Do you have TDS?

Who is this “most people” who should be president? That’s what you are saying.

50.2% who voted in the 2024 election voted for someone other than Trump to be president. Therefore “most people” did not vote for Trump.

Trump is our President. Thank God.

And yet most people don’t agree with you.

Trump is your president because the people spoke. Your agreement was not asked.

Yes. 50.2% of people spoke and said they didn’t want Trump to be the president. I don’t know why you’re acting like this is something I don’t agree on. He won the election. But most people voted for someone else. That is all.

Who is this someone else?

Any other candidate not named Trump. 50.2% of voters cast their ballot for a different candidate. Thus most people didn’t vote for him. They voted for someone else. They didn’t want him to be president.

They wanted him more than anyone else. Suck it.

50.2% of people voted for someone else. Most people didn’t want him. I’ve said several times that he won the popular vote and the election. But you haven’t once acknowledged the fact that the majority of voters voted him not to be president.