Trump says troops are getting paid

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does this increase the odds of a longer shutdown?

Absolutely. Trump cares about the troops, and he’s glad the Feds are getting RIFed.

Keep the government closed. Thank you, Schumer and Dems!

[Anonymous]

Let’s figure out what else can be chopped.

[Anonymous]

Maybe if Schumer does another video and drops 2 f-bombs Trump will fold.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does this increase the odds of a longer shutdown?

Yup. Troops going unpaid was a major lever in getting GOP to negotiate. I will be surprised if Trump can pull off making this happen though - from a logistics standpoint.

dems should just end this nonsense now. move on and pick another battle later.

Reps literally control all 3 branches.

This ends when they say so.

60 votes. It only takes a few more Democrats to end this. Schumer is blocking that for now.

Usually, if you don't have enough votes to pass something as is, you need to make some revisions in order to get more votes. That's not happening here. It's not democrats job to rubberstamp everything.

What is there in a 24 page CR to adjust?

Do you even know what they’re fighting about? Rs don’t want to extend ACA subsidies. Under the R plans millions will be priced out of health insurance. I’m not sure why people would be rooting for making health insurance even more unaffordable.

https://www.kff.org/affordable-care-act/aca-marketplace-premium-payments-would-more-than-double-on-average-next-year-if-enhanced-premium-tax-credits-expire/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does this increase the odds of a longer shutdown?

Yup. Troops going unpaid was a major lever in getting GOP to negotiate. I will be surprised if Trump can pull off making this happen though - from a logistics standpoint.

dems should just end this nonsense now. move on and pick another battle later.

Reps literally control all 3 branches.

This ends when they say so.

60 votes. It only takes a few more Democrats to end this. Schumer is blocking that for now.

Republicans can get rid of the filibuster. Regular Americans don’t care about it. They don’t. So this is on them. They already have 3 Ds who voted with them. It wouldn’t taken much to get 7 more. But R are weak negotiators. Unless it’s bullying, they don’t know how to do it.

[Anonymous]

Schumer and Dollar Store Obama are losing bigly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think that's legal.

It’s literally unconstitutional.

Congress has declined to assert its Article I authorities around spending, so I guess nothing matters anymore. Trump is our King, because a minority of people want that and the Electoral College allows them to decide.

Hyperbole, much?
Also, Trump win the popular vote as well. Your whining about the electoral college doesn’t help your argument because he didn’t need it. He would’ve been elected without it.

Trump did not win the majority of the popular vote. He only won a plurality, 49.8%, meaning most people who voted did not vote for him.

Moreover, he received votes from only 77 million people, meaning a mere 32% of eligible voters cast a ballot for him. If you consider the entire U.S. population, only 23% of people voted for him.

So, yes, a minority of people voted for Trump. Deal with it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does this increase the odds of a longer shutdown?

Yup. Troops going unpaid was a major lever in getting GOP to negotiate. I will be surprised if Trump can pull off making this happen though - from a logistics standpoint.

dems should just end this nonsense now. move on and pick another battle later.

Reps literally control all 3 branches.

This ends when they say so.

60 votes. It only takes a few more Democrats to end this. Schumer is blocking that for now.

Republicans can get rid of the filibuster. Regular Americans don’t care about it. They don’t. So this is on them. They already have 3 Ds who voted with them. It wouldn’t taken much to get 7 more. But R are weak negotiators. Unless it’s bullying, they don’t know how to do it.

There’s nothing to negotiate. Dem agencies getting slashed. Military getting paid.

Keep it closed. I’m sure Trump has more up his sleeve for next week.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think that's legal.

It’s literally unconstitutional.

Congress has declined to assert its Article I authorities around spending, so I guess nothing matters anymore. Trump is our King, because a minority of people want that and the Electoral College allows them to decide.

Hyperbole, much?
Also, Trump win the popular vote as well. Your whining about the electoral college doesn’t help your argument because he didn’t need it. He would’ve been elected without it.

Trump did not win the majority of the popular vote. He only won a plurality, 49.8%, meaning most people who voted did not vote for him.

Moreover, he received votes from only 77 million people, meaning a mere 32% of eligible voters cast a ballot for him. If you consider the entire U.S. population, only 23% of people voted for him.

So, yes, a minority of people voted for Trump. Deal with it.

And even fewer voted for your girl. Deal with it.

[Anonymous]

Any hope for civilians forced to work during the lapse?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think that's legal.

It’s literally unconstitutional.

Congress has declined to assert its Article I authorities around spending, so I guess nothing matters anymore. Trump is our King, because a minority of people want that and the Electoral College allows them to decide.

Hyperbole, much?
Also, Trump win the popular vote as well. Your whining about the electoral college doesn’t help your argument because he didn’t need it. He would’ve been elected without it.

Trump did not win the majority of the popular vote. He only won a plurality, 49.8%, meaning most people who voted did not vote for him.

Moreover, he received votes from only 77 million people, meaning a mere 32% of eligible voters cast a ballot for him. If you consider the entire U.S. population, only 23% of people voted for him.

So, yes, a minority of people voted for Trump. Deal with it.

And even fewer voted for your girl. Deal with it.

Doesn’t matter. Most people didn’t choose Trump, and his abysmal approval numbers show they still don’t.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think that's legal.

It’s literally unconstitutional.

Congress has declined to assert its Article I authorities around spending, so I guess nothing matters anymore. Trump is our King, because a minority of people want that and the Electoral College allows them to decide.

Hyperbole, much?
Also, Trump win the popular vote as well. Your whining about the electoral college doesn’t help your argument because he didn’t need it. He would’ve been elected without it.

Trump did not win the majority of the popular vote. He only won a plurality, 49.8%, meaning most people who voted did not vote for him.

Moreover, he received votes from only 77 million people, meaning a mere 32% of eligible voters cast a ballot for him. If you consider the entire U.S. population, only 23% of people voted for him.

So, yes, a minority of people voted for Trump. Deal with it.

Pp- looks like you have to deal with it. He’s the president.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Any hope for civilians forced to work during the lapse?

No news about them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think that's legal.

It’s literally unconstitutional.

Congress has declined to assert its Article I authorities around spending, so I guess nothing matters anymore. Trump is our King, because a minority of people want that and the Electoral College allows them to decide.

Hyperbole, much?
Also, Trump win the popular vote as well. Your whining about the electoral college doesn’t help your argument because he didn’t need it. He would’ve been elected without it.

Trump did not win the majority of the popular vote. He only won a plurality, 49.8%, meaning most people who voted did not vote for him.

Moreover, he received votes from only 77 million people, meaning a mere 32% of eligible voters cast a ballot for him. If you consider the entire U.S. population, only 23% of people voted for him.

So, yes, a minority of people voted for Trump. Deal with it.

Pp- looks like you have to deal with it. He’s the president.

I didn’t say he’s not. That doesn’t change the fact that most people who voted did not want him to be president. He is not popular and has no mandate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think that's legal.

It’s literally unconstitutional.

Congress has declined to assert its Article I authorities around spending, so I guess nothing matters anymore. Trump is our King, because a minority of people want that and the Electoral College allows them to decide.

Hyperbole, much?
Also, Trump win the popular vote as well. Your whining about the electoral college doesn’t help your argument because he didn’t need it. He would’ve been elected without it.

Trump did not win the majority of the popular vote. He only won a plurality, 49.8%, meaning most people who voted did not vote for him.

Moreover, he received votes from only 77 million people, meaning a mere 32% of eligible voters cast a ballot for him. If you consider the entire U.S. population, only 23% of people voted for him.

So, yes, a minority of people voted for Trump. Deal with it.

No one said he won a majority. He did what you admit win the popular vote. A lesser minority voted for your girl.