Slim picking dating in your fifties

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's very hard for 50-something women (I'm in my late 50s and married for 30 years) to rhink the grass is always greener only to face the reality that they are considered past their prime once they get back out there thinking they'll easily trade up. We are past our prime. Those days are gone. We're grandma lions sitting in the shade, not cubs rolling around in the sun. We are never going to compete with a younger women physically, and men don't find our jobs sexy, or a catch. Oh, you're divorced and sit at a desk all day gaining weight while you earn money and obsess about your work, I love you already, said no man ever. It's why a man will pick a barista over the woman with the MBA and a Ph.D. Young, pretty, fertile, available, caring, compassionate, peaceful. That's all he wants.

To me dating fishy change at all palsy divorce. I dated 30s men when I was in my 20s. In late 40s I date mid to late 50s men. Hot much younger women are not looking for them unless they want $$$ and by far not all men want sugar babies. Most men who look for a LTR date 5-10 years younger women .

* hardly changed post divorce - silly autocorrect !

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m so tired of this “unrealistic expectations” crap. I’m a 51 YO woman, ... if I’m going to sleep with you, you better be attractive!

Yes, both partners must be attractive.

Anonymous wrote:IME people who are looking for a relationship ... want to meet quickly in a low stakes situation- coffee or a drink. I definitely don’t want to plan an evening with someone new.

Single women want unlimited selection. If the men are asking and paying, then why not schedule a bunch of convenient free dates? The answer is that the men you want are quite different from 90% of the available men. Some women get a lot of dates and decide to do a quick meet-up to make sure the guy is not a loser.

Now think of the man's perspective. An attractive 51-year-old man can date an attractive young-looking 41-year-old woman. It displays bad attitude when the woman schedules a convenient coffee date, or is late, or dressed in gym clothes. I suggest a drink at the free daily Kennedy Center show. This gives you the option to upgrade to a second drink or dinner. It is rude when the woman treats the first meeting as an audition or a free-option instead of a real date.

Nobody ever fell in love over coffee. After 90+ coffee dates, D.C. dating author Erika Ettin finally met her fiance for an evening drink. My wife did this too, until I took her for an evening glass of wine. Be patient, and you might have the privilege of being my next ex-wife.

It sucks to dress up for a bunch of frogs, but you must always be prepared for a prince. Think of this as an interview, where you dress for the job you want. If you want the job of lover, then you had better be pleasant, punctual and dressed like a lover.

PP here: but I like the idea of KC in the afternoon . Just because at first meeting I would want to see what’s your intellectual depth and if we connect. I would have already interviewed you on video call prior to RL meeting and ensured you are not fat

I wouldn’t continue into evening because I date non-exclusively several men at a time and someone would be already balls deep into me Saturday night. But you have a chance at date 3, if I’m very interested and decide to drop the prior guy.

DP. Inviting someone to an overpriced drink with overpriced parking for a free show? Plus I’m assuming anyone posting this hasn’t looked at the line up recently.

Noseda’s symphony concert was great a few weeks ago. He’s still there so hope not lost for KC series
I wouldn’t date anyone concerned about $30 parking fee but that said, there is plentiful free street afternoon parking in the area. Particular in the afternoon

I also see NSO concerts. It’s not a better early date than coffee or after work drinks. You don’t sit silently for 80 minutes with a stranger.

I was not suggesting the day concert can you read? At least KC has nice walks and views at Potomac if the stranger is a total dud. You can get drinks at he rooftop they open at 5 pm so I’ll still have time to retreat to my late evening f..k sessions

I figured you were a poseur and you’re confirming it. I was not suggesting a day concert either. NSO plays at night. Last concert was 80 minutes. Sounds like you haven’t actually been to a concert either. Just bored and trolling women on the internet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m so tired of this “unrealistic expectations” crap. I’m a 51 YO woman, ... if I’m going to sleep with you, you better be attractive!

Yes, both partners must be attractive.

Anonymous wrote:IME people who are looking for a relationship ... want to meet quickly in a low stakes situation- coffee or a drink. I definitely don’t want to plan an evening with someone new.

Single women want unlimited selection. If the men are asking and paying, then why not schedule a bunch of convenient free dates? The answer is that the men you want are quite different from 90% of the available men. Some women get a lot of dates and decide to do a quick meet-up to make sure the guy is not a loser.

Now think of the man's perspective. An attractive 51-year-old man can date an attractive young-looking 41-year-old woman. It displays bad attitude when the woman schedules a convenient coffee date, or is late, or dressed in gym clothes. I suggest a drink at the free daily Kennedy Center show. This gives you the option to upgrade to a second drink or dinner. It is rude when the woman treats the first meeting as an audition or a free-option instead of a real date.

Nobody ever fell in love over coffee. After 90+ coffee dates, D.C. dating author Erika Ettin finally met her fiance for an evening drink. My wife did this too, until I took her for an evening glass of wine. Be patient, and you might have the privilege of being my next ex-wife.

It sucks to dress up for a bunch of frogs, but you must always be prepared for a prince. Think of this as an interview, where you dress for the job you want. If you want the job of lover, then you had better be pleasant, punctual and dressed like a lover.

Beautiful women on OLD usually already have several lovers. They don’t WANT unlimited selection of dates. They already have that unlimited selection, it’s their call. Not yours.

Both my lovers have several million on bank accounts, own businesses, homes, take me for weekend trips. Both are fit over 6’. I can’t decide which one to pick dating both already several months. I’m a late 40s woman

Do they know about each other?

I think this is common, but I also notice the terminology is a little weird. What you described sounds more or less "poly," but most people think of "poly" as referring to a certain kind of quirky and unattractive group of people, not well dressed people who have good jobs and stay at fancy hotels during their glamorous vacations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m so tired of this “unrealistic expectations” crap. I’m a 51 YO woman, ... if I’m going to sleep with you, you better be attractive!

Yes, both partners must be attractive.

Anonymous wrote:IME people who are looking for a relationship ... want to meet quickly in a low stakes situation- coffee or a drink. I definitely don’t want to plan an evening with someone new.

Single women want unlimited selection. If the men are asking and paying, then why not schedule a bunch of convenient free dates? The answer is that the men you want are quite different from 90% of the available men. Some women get a lot of dates and decide to do a quick meet-up to make sure the guy is not a loser.

Now think of the man's perspective. An attractive 51-year-old man can date an attractive young-looking 41-year-old woman. It displays bad attitude when the woman schedules a convenient coffee date, or is late, or dressed in gym clothes. I suggest a drink at the free daily Kennedy Center show. This gives you the option to upgrade to a second drink or dinner. It is rude when the woman treats the first meeting as an audition or a free-option instead of a real date.

Nobody ever fell in love over coffee. After 90+ coffee dates, D.C. dating author Erika Ettin finally met her fiance for an evening drink. My wife did this too, until I took her for an evening glass of wine. Be patient, and you might have the privilege of being my next ex-wife.

It sucks to dress up for a bunch of frogs, but you must always be prepared for a prince. Think of this as an interview, where you dress for the job you want. If you want the job of lover, then you had better be pleasant, punctual and dressed like a lover.

Beautiful women on OLD usually already have several lovers. They don’t WANT unlimited selection of dates. They already have that unlimited selection, it’s their call. Not yours.

Both my lovers have several million on bank accounts, own businesses, homes, take me for weekend trips. Both are fit over 6’. I can’t decide which one to pick dating both already several months. I’m a late 40s woman

Do they know about each other?

I think this is common, but I also notice the terminology is a little weird. What you described sounds more or less "poly," but most people think of "poly" as referring to a certain kind of quirky and unattractive group of people, not well dressed people who have good jobs and stay at fancy hotels during their glamorous vacations.

I think that was one fiction writer talking to another.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m so tired of this “unrealistic expectations” crap. I’m a 51 YO woman, ... if I’m going to sleep with you, you better be attractive!

Yes, both partners must be attractive.

Anonymous wrote:IME people who are looking for a relationship ... want to meet quickly in a low stakes situation- coffee or a drink. I definitely don’t want to plan an evening with someone new.

Single women want unlimited selection. If the men are asking and paying, then why not schedule a bunch of convenient free dates? The answer is that the men you want are quite different from 90% of the available men. Some women get a lot of dates and decide to do a quick meet-up to make sure the guy is not a loser.

Now think of the man's perspective. An attractive 51-year-old man can date an attractive young-looking 41-year-old woman. It displays bad attitude when the woman schedules a convenient coffee date, or is late, or dressed in gym clothes. I suggest a drink at the free daily Kennedy Center show. This gives you the option to upgrade to a second drink or dinner. It is rude when the woman treats the first meeting as an audition or a free-option instead of a real date.

Nobody ever fell in love over coffee. After 90+ coffee dates, D.C. dating author Erika Ettin finally met her fiance for an evening drink. My wife did this too, until I took her for an evening glass of wine. Be patient, and you might have the privilege of being my next ex-wife.

It sucks to dress up for a bunch of frogs, but you must always be prepared for a prince. Think of this as an interview, where you dress for the job you want. If you want the job of lover, then you had better be pleasant, punctual and dressed like a lover.

Beautiful women on OLD usually already have several lovers. They don’t WANT unlimited selection of dates. They already have that unlimited selection, it’s their call. Not yours.

Both my lovers have several million on bank accounts, own businesses, homes, take me for weekend trips. Both are fit over 6’. I can’t decide which one to pick dating both already several months. I’m a late 40s woman

Do they know about each other?

I think this is common, but I also notice the terminology is a little weird. What you described sounds more or less "poly," but most people think of "poly" as referring to a certain kind of quirky and unattractive group of people, not well dressed people who have good jobs and stay at fancy hotels during their glamorous vacations.

I think that was one fiction writer talking to another.

I just tell I assume we are not exclusive unless it becomes serious and everyone uses protection . I also only sleep with tested people and test myself regularly

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m so tired of this “unrealistic expectations” crap. I’m a 51 YO woman, ... if I’m going to sleep with you, you better be attractive!

Yes, both partners must be attractive.

Anonymous wrote:IME people who are looking for a relationship ... want to meet quickly in a low stakes situation- coffee or a drink. I definitely don’t want to plan an evening with someone new.

Single women want unlimited selection. If the men are asking and paying, then why not schedule a bunch of convenient free dates? The answer is that the men you want are quite different from 90% of the available men. Some women get a lot of dates and decide to do a quick meet-up to make sure the guy is not a loser.

Now think of the man's perspective. An attractive 51-year-old man can date an attractive young-looking 41-year-old woman. It displays bad attitude when the woman schedules a convenient coffee date, or is late, or dressed in gym clothes. I suggest a drink at the free daily Kennedy Center show. This gives you the option to upgrade to a second drink or dinner. It is rude when the woman treats the first meeting as an audition or a free-option instead of a real date.

Nobody ever fell in love over coffee. After 90+ coffee dates, D.C. dating author Erika Ettin finally met her fiance for an evening drink. My wife did this too, until I took her for an evening glass of wine. Be patient, and you might have the privilege of being my next ex-wife.

It sucks to dress up for a bunch of frogs, but you must always be prepared for a prince. Think of this as an interview, where you dress for the job you want. If you want the job of lover, then you had better be pleasant, punctual and dressed like a lover.

Beautiful women on OLD usually already have several lovers. They don’t WANT unlimited selection of dates. They already have that unlimited selection, it’s their call. Not yours.

Both my lovers have several million on bank accounts, own businesses, homes, take me for weekend trips. Both are fit over 6’. I can’t decide which one to pick dating both already several months. I’m a late 40s woman

Do they know about each other?

I think this is common, but I also notice the terminology is a little weird. What you described sounds more or less "poly," but most people think of "poly" as referring to a certain kind of quirky and unattractive group of people, not well dressed people who have good jobs and stay at fancy hotels during their glamorous vacations.

I think that was one fiction writer talking to another.

I just tell I assume we are not exclusive unless it becomes serious and everyone uses protection . I also only sleep with tested people and test myself regularly

Does anybody ever ask "are you sleeping with other people?" Or "who else are you sleeping with?" I've been pretty honest when asking these kinds of questions but I've known women who totally freaked out when I asked them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
I like the idea of KC in the afternoon ... to see what’s your intellectual depth and if we connect.

I wouldn’t continue into evening because I date non-exclusively several men at a time ... But you have a chance at date 3, if I’m very interested and decide to drop the prior guy.

The Kennedy Center Millennium stage show is free at 6:00 every day.

A first date should be relaxed, flexible and low-pressure. Longer shows and dinners are a burden, but it is easy to walk out of a free show or stay and grab a second drink. My nerdy Korean friend asked recommendations on American restaurants for a first date, because American culture was considered "cool". Somehow, he got a recommendation for Chucky Cheese. This turned out to be great, because it is interactive. His date thought he was confident and fun instead of clueless. They are now married. Also try food festivals, ice skating, bowling, etc.

It is fair to date anyone. But men don't like the idea of paying for dates so you can smash another guy later the same evening. That is another reason why men should choose cheap dates with higher-priority time slots. I want to shoot my shot with someone who is available.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m so tired of this “unrealistic expectations” crap. I’m a 51 YO woman, ... if I’m going to sleep with you, you better be attractive!

Yes, both partners must be attractive.

Anonymous wrote:IME people who are looking for a relationship ... want to meet quickly in a low stakes situation- coffee or a drink. I definitely don’t want to plan an evening with someone new.

Single women want unlimited selection. If the men are asking and paying, then why not schedule a bunch of convenient free dates? The answer is that the men you want are quite different from 90% of the available men. Some women get a lot of dates and decide to do a quick meet-up to make sure the guy is not a loser.

Now think of the man's perspective. An attractive 51-year-old man can date an attractive young-looking 41-year-old woman. It displays bad attitude when the woman schedules a convenient coffee date, or is late, or dressed in gym clothes. I suggest a drink at the free daily Kennedy Center show. This gives you the option to upgrade to a second drink or dinner. It is rude when the woman treats the first meeting as an audition or a free-option instead of a real date.

Nobody ever fell in love over coffee. After 90+ coffee dates, D.C. dating author Erika Ettin finally met her fiance for an evening drink. My wife did this too, until I took her for an evening glass of wine. Be patient, and you might have the privilege of being my next ex-wife.

It sucks to dress up for a bunch of frogs, but you must always be prepared for a prince. Think of this as an interview, where you dress for the job you want. If you want the job of lover, then you had better be pleasant, punctual and dressed like a lover.

Beautiful women on OLD usually already have several lovers. They don’t WANT unlimited selection of dates. They already have that unlimited selection, it’s their call. Not yours.

Both my lovers have several million on bank accounts, own businesses, homes, take me for weekend trips. Both are fit over 6’. I can’t decide which one to pick dating both already several months. I’m a late 40s woman

Do they know about each other?

I think this is common, but I also notice the terminology is a little weird. What you described sounds more or less "poly," but most people think of "poly" as referring to a certain kind of quirky and unattractive group of people, not well dressed people who have good jobs and stay at fancy hotels during their glamorous vacations.

I think that was one fiction writer talking to another.

I just tell I assume we are not exclusive unless it becomes serious and everyone uses protection . I also only sleep with tested people and test myself regularly

Does anybody ever ask "are you sleeping with other people?" Or "who else are you sleeping with?" I've been pretty honest when asking these kinds of questions but I've known women who totally freaked out when I asked them.

Yes and I tell I may or may not be exclusive sexually with them but I tags precautions. Other partners information is none of their business unless we are in a relationship

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m so tired of this “unrealistic expectations” crap. I’m a 51 YO woman, ... if I’m going to sleep with you, you better be attractive!

Yes, both partners must be attractive.

Anonymous wrote:IME people who are looking for a relationship ... want to meet quickly in a low stakes situation- coffee or a drink. I definitely don’t want to plan an evening with someone new.

Single women want unlimited selection. If the men are asking and paying, then why not schedule a bunch of convenient free dates? The answer is that the men you want are quite different from 90% of the available men. Some women get a lot of dates and decide to do a quick meet-up to make sure the guy is not a loser.

Now think of the man's perspective. An attractive 51-year-old man can date an attractive young-looking 41-year-old woman. It displays bad attitude when the woman schedules a convenient coffee date, or is late, or dressed in gym clothes. I suggest a drink at the free daily Kennedy Center show. This gives you the option to upgrade to a second drink or dinner. It is rude when the woman treats the first meeting as an audition or a free-option instead of a real date.

Nobody ever fell in love over coffee. After 90+ coffee dates, D.C. dating author Erika Ettin finally met her fiance for an evening drink. My wife did this too, until I took her for an evening glass of wine. Be patient, and you might have the privilege of being my next ex-wife.

It sucks to dress up for a bunch of frogs, but you must always be prepared for a prince. Think of this as an interview, where you dress for the job you want. If you want the job of lover, then you had better be pleasant, punctual and dressed like a lover.

Beautiful women on OLD usually already have several lovers. They don’t WANT unlimited selection of dates. They already have that unlimited selection, it’s their call. Not yours.

Both my lovers have several million on bank accounts, own businesses, homes, take me for weekend trips. Both are fit over 6’. I can’t decide which one to pick dating both already several months. I’m a late 40s woman

Do they know about each other?

I think this is common, but I also notice the terminology is a little weird. What you described sounds more or less "poly," but most people think of "poly" as referring to a certain kind of quirky and unattractive group of people, not well dressed people who have good jobs and stay at fancy hotels during their glamorous vacations.

I think that was one fiction writer talking to another.

No, it's just one of the countless beautiful women on DCUM describing her limitless options with gorgeous, rich men. Very common (on the Internet).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm a man in my 50s and I have no problem with women showing up in work clothes. That usually means they have jobs.

You find the Best Buy uniform sexy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I like the idea of KC in the afternoon ... to see what’s your intellectual depth and if we connect.

I wouldn’t continue into evening because I date non-exclusively several men at a time ... But you have a chance at date 3, if I’m very interested and decide to drop the prior guy.

The Kennedy Center Millennium stage show is free at 6:00 every day.

A first date should be relaxed, flexible and low-pressure. Longer shows and dinners are a burden, but it is easy to walk out of a free show or stay and grab a second drink. My nerdy Korean friend asked recommendations on American restaurants for a first date, because American culture was considered "cool". Somehow, he got a recommendation for Chucky Cheese. This turned out to be great, because it is interactive. His date thought he was confident and fun instead of clueless. They are now married. Also try food festivals, ice skating, bowling, etc.

It is fair to date anyone. But men don't like the idea of paying for dates so you can smash another guy later the same evening. That is another reason why men should choose cheap dates with higher-priority time slots. I want to shoot my shot with someone who is available.

First, I’m available . I’m just dating like men do - what’s an issue with that ? Second, KC afternoon coffee is a cheap date. Third, if I like him and it’s mutual I’ll smash him just like other 2 guys maybe I meet finally one man that meets all my needs

[Anonymous]

I believe that woman is telling the truth. I'm a man and I've dated a few women like her. They're not totally available emotionally but not totally unavailable either. They're usually pretty good at avoiding having their hearts broken.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I believe that woman is telling the truth. I'm a man and I've dated a few women like her. They're not totally available emotionally but not totally unavailable either. They're usually pretty good at avoiding having their hearts broken.

I’m telling 100% truth. I chat and meet dozens of men every week; sleep with two. They are both busy business people with kids: why should I spend my weekend alone when he’s visiting his family ? When we are not even in a relationship and he didn’t ask to be his GF yet. If he does, I’ll tell I’m not ready or agree (if I’m ready ).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m so tired of this “unrealistic expectations” crap. I’m a 51 YO woman, ... if I’m going to sleep with you, you better be attractive!

Yes, both partners must be attractive.

Anonymous wrote:IME people who are looking for a relationship ... want to meet quickly in a low stakes situation- coffee or a drink. I definitely don’t want to plan an evening with someone new.

Single women want unlimited selection. If the men are asking and paying, then why not schedule a bunch of convenient free dates? The answer is that the men you want are quite different from 90% of the available men. Some women get a lot of dates and decide to do a quick meet-up to make sure the guy is not a loser.

Now think of the man's perspective. An attractive 51-year-old man can date an attractive young-looking 41-year-old woman. It displays bad attitude when the woman schedules a convenient coffee date, or is late, or dressed in gym clothes. I suggest a drink at the free daily Kennedy Center show. This gives you the option to upgrade to a second drink or dinner. It is rude when the woman treats the first meeting as an audition or a free-option instead of a real date.

Nobody ever fell in love over coffee. After 90+ coffee dates, D.C. dating author Erika Ettin finally met her fiance for an evening drink. My wife did this too, until I took her for an evening glass of wine. Be patient, and you might have the privilege of being my next ex-wife.

It sucks to dress up for a bunch of frogs, but you must always be prepared for a prince. Think of this as an interview, where you dress for the job you want. If you want the job of lover, then you had better be pleasant, punctual and dressed like a lover.

Beautiful women on OLD usually already have several lovers. They don’t WANT unlimited selection of dates. They already have that unlimited selection, it’s their call. Not yours.

Both my lovers have several million on bank accounts, own businesses, homes, take me for weekend trips. Both are fit over 6’. I can’t decide which one to pick dating both already several months. I’m a late 40s woman

Do they know about each other?

I think this is common, but I also notice the terminology is a little weird. What you described sounds more or less "poly," but most people think of "poly" as referring to a certain kind of quirky and unattractive group of people, not well dressed people who have good jobs and stay at fancy hotels during their glamorous vacations.

I think that was one fiction writer talking to another.

I just tell I assume we are not exclusive unless it becomes serious and everyone uses protection . I also only sleep with tested people and test myself regularly

Does anybody ever ask "are you sleeping with other people?" Or "who else are you sleeping with?" I've been pretty honest when asking these kinds of questions but I've known women who totally freaked out when I asked them.

Yes and I tell I may or may not be exclusive sexually with them but I tags precautions. Other partners information is none of their business unless we are in a relationship

You are so disgusting that I hope you are a troll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m so tired of this “unrealistic expectations” crap. I’m a 51 YO woman, ... if I’m going to sleep with you, you better be attractive!

Yes, both partners must be attractive.

Anonymous wrote:IME people who are looking for a relationship ... want to meet quickly in a low stakes situation- coffee or a drink. I definitely don’t want to plan an evening with someone new.

Single women want unlimited selection. If the men are asking and paying, then why not schedule a bunch of convenient free dates? The answer is that the men you want are quite different from 90% of the available men. Some women get a lot of dates and decide to do a quick meet-up to make sure the guy is not a loser.

Now think of the man's perspective. An attractive 51-year-old man can date an attractive young-looking 41-year-old woman. It displays bad attitude when the woman schedules a convenient coffee date, or is late, or dressed in gym clothes. I suggest a drink at the free daily Kennedy Center show. This gives you the option to upgrade to a second drink or dinner. It is rude when the woman treats the first meeting as an audition or a free-option instead of a real date.

Nobody ever fell in love over coffee. After 90+ coffee dates, D.C. dating author Erika Ettin finally met her fiance for an evening drink. My wife did this too, until I took her for an evening glass of wine. Be patient, and you might have the privilege of being my next ex-wife.

It sucks to dress up for a bunch of frogs, but you must always be prepared for a prince. Think of this as an interview, where you dress for the job you want. If you want the job of lover, then you had better be pleasant, punctual and dressed like a lover.

Beautiful women on OLD usually already have several lovers. They don’t WANT unlimited selection of dates. They already have that unlimited selection, it’s their call. Not yours.

Both my lovers have several million on bank accounts, own businesses, homes, take me for weekend trips. Both are fit over 6’. I can’t decide which one to pick dating both already several months. I’m a late 40s woman

Do they know about each other?

I think this is common, but I also notice the terminology is a little weird. What you described sounds more or less "poly," but most people think of "poly" as referring to a certain kind of quirky and unattractive group of people, not well dressed people who have good jobs and stay at fancy hotels during their glamorous vacations.

I think that was one fiction writer talking to another.

I just tell I assume we are not exclusive unless it becomes serious and everyone uses protection . I also only sleep with tested people and test myself regularly

Does anybody ever ask "are you sleeping with other people?" Or "who else are you sleeping with?" I've been pretty honest when asking these kinds of questions but I've known women who totally freaked out when I asked them.

Yes and I tell I may or may not be exclusive sexually with them but I tags precautions. Other partners information is none of their business unless we are in a relationship

You are so disgusting that I hope you are a troll.

Why ? Men do the same we are all tested for STDs and use protection. Most guys on OLD don’t even bother about it sleeping around whatever