Vance’s Latest Misogynistic View

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Postmenopausal females" -- and they wonder why we call them weird. What a psychotic way to refer to older women.

Does he refer to his mother this way? Will he refer to his wife this way when she hits that stage? Weirdo.

He gives me incel vibes.

Honestly? No, he probably won’t. That’s how it is for these types. YOU and most other women are only good for having babies and then being unpaid caregivers for babies in your old age. His own wife and children are allowed to have families and careers. They can also get excellent $$$ private school educations, get an abortion if they want one even if they have to leave the country for it, and have 1-2 or no kids and it’s fine FOR THEM. But not for the rest of us.

If it wasn’t for double standards, they’d have no standards at all!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

On top of the wannabe authoritarian’s other archaic views of women, the Ohio senator revealed to Fox News Wednesday that he doesn’t believe it’s “normal” for suburban women to care about their reproductive rights.

“What do you say to suburban women out there who are marinating in this propaganda?” prompted Fox News host Laura Ingraham, claiming that some women have fallen into the belief that abortion is banned nationally.

“Well, first of all, I don’t buy that, Laura,” Vance said. “I think most suburban women care about the normal things that most Americans care about.”

https://newrepublic.com/post/184896/jd-vance-claim-women-voters-rights

he's trying to make women who are fighting for their rights sound abnormal or weird. sorry vance, that won't work - it's you that is the outlier with fringe views.

He is making this fatal mistake of continually insulting vast swaths of voters- childless women, post menopausal women, working women, people who love cats…. Has this friendless loser ever met a cat lover???

You do not F with people who love cats!!🐈‍⬛

How does anyone think this “trained lawyer” is going to debate a normal? He is so completely out of touch and living on another planet.

Agree! Cat woman here who is very very pissed with JD! 😡

I'm not sure he was going to win many votes among "childless cat ladies" anyway. But at the margin maybe cat owners will decided the election in swing states. That would be pretty hilarious if Trump lost due to pissing off women that have cats.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

On top of the wannabe authoritarian’s other archaic views of women, the Ohio senator revealed to Fox News Wednesday that he doesn’t believe it’s “normal” for suburban women to care about their reproductive rights.

“What do you say to suburban women out there who are marinating in this propaganda?” prompted Fox News host Laura Ingraham, claiming that some women have fallen into the belief that abortion is banned nationally.

“Well, first of all, I don’t buy that, Laura,” Vance said. “I think most suburban women care about the normal things that most Americans care about.”

https://newrepublic.com/post/184896/jd-vance-claim-women-voters-rights

he's trying to make women who are fighting for their rights sound abnormal or weird. sorry vance, that won't work - it's you that is the outlier with fringe views.

He is making this fatal mistake of continually insulting vast swaths of voters- childless women, post menopausal women, working women, people who love cats…. Has this friendless loser ever met a cat lover???

You do not F with people who love cats!!🐈‍⬛

How does anyone think this “trained lawyer” is going to debate a normal? He is so completely out of touch and living on another planet.

Agree! Cat woman here who is very very pissed with JD! 😡

I'm not sure he was going to win many votes among "childless cat ladies" anyway. But at the margin maybe cat owners will decided the election in swing states. That would be pretty hilarious if Trump lost due to pissing off women that have cats.

I think it’s a testimony to the complete and utter insanity of our politics that *owning a cat* now seems like a political statement.

Pets should not be political statements. Not everything needs to be political. Politics has infested everything to our detriment. Thanks sofa loren!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The wording of this statement is just bad and it gives the left great content to create political attacks. However, the statement itself if consistent with commonly accepted human evolutionary theory regarding the grandparents providing a survival advantage for grandkids.

Come on. Speak like a normal human. It sounds like your brain is rotting in redpill nonsense when you start talking about the world through "evolutionary theory" and "survival advantage."

Look on the bright side - Vance believes in evolutionary theory!

Honestly, I think he is faking the whole religion thing. He does not talk like he is a remotely religious person.

Yet he’s supposedly a relatively recent convert to Catholicism, so he must have convinced at least one priest, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

On top of the wannabe authoritarian’s other archaic views of women, the Ohio senator revealed to Fox News Wednesday that he doesn’t believe it’s “normal” for suburban women to care about their reproductive rights.

“What do you say to suburban women out there who are marinating in this propaganda?” prompted Fox News host Laura Ingraham, claiming that some women have fallen into the belief that abortion is banned nationally.

“Well, first of all, I don’t buy that, Laura,” Vance said. “I think most suburban women care about the normal things that most Americans care about.”

https://newrepublic.com/post/184896/jd-vance-claim-women-voters-rights

he's trying to make women who are fighting for their rights sound abnormal or weird. sorry vance, that won't work - it's you that is the outlier with fringe views.

He is making this fatal mistake of continually insulting vast swaths of voters- childless women, post menopausal women, working women, people who love cats…. Has this friendless loser ever met a cat lover???

You do not F with people who love cats!!🐈‍⬛

How does anyone think this “trained lawyer” is going to debate a normal? He is so completely out of touch and living on another planet.

I agree with everything you said except that I think Vance will be a good debater. He said he doesn't mind being aggressive and he can't wait to attack Walz on his military experience. Vance is undignified and will enjoy hitting below the belt despite Walz being a thoroughly decent person who has a great service record. Vance has no shame.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

On top of the wannabe authoritarian’s other archaic views of women, the Ohio senator revealed to Fox News Wednesday that he doesn’t believe it’s “normal” for suburban women to care about their reproductive rights.

“What do you say to suburban women out there who are marinating in this propaganda?” prompted Fox News host Laura Ingraham, claiming that some women have fallen into the belief that abortion is banned nationally.

“Well, first of all, I don’t buy that, Laura,” Vance said. “I think most suburban women care about the normal things that most Americans care about.”

https://newrepublic.com/post/184896/jd-vance-claim-women-voters-rights

he's trying to make women who are fighting for their rights sound abnormal or weird. sorry vance, that won't work - it's you that is the outlier with fringe views.

He is making this fatal mistake of continually insulting vast swaths of voters- childless women, post menopausal women, working women, people who love cats…. Has this friendless loser ever met a cat lover???

You do not F with people who love cats!!🐈‍⬛

How does anyone think this “trained lawyer” is going to debate a normal? He is so completely out of touch and living on another planet.

I agree with everything you said except that I think Vance will be a good debater. He said he doesn't mind being aggressive and he can't wait to attack Walz on his military experience. Vance is undignified and will enjoy hitting below the belt despite Walz being a thoroughly decent person who has a great service record. Vance has no shame.

A high ranking army officer will be able to handle him.

[Anonymous]

I'm sure Walz has no idea that Vance might take that tack and certainly would not prepare the appropriate response.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

On top of the wannabe authoritarian’s other archaic views of women, the Ohio senator revealed to Fox News Wednesday that he doesn’t believe it’s “normal” for suburban women to care about their reproductive rights.

“What do you say to suburban women out there who are marinating in this propaganda?” prompted Fox News host Laura Ingraham, claiming that some women have fallen into the belief that abortion is banned nationally.

“Well, first of all, I don’t buy that, Laura,” Vance said. “I think most suburban women care about the normal things that most Americans care about.”

https://newrepublic.com/post/184896/jd-vance-claim-women-voters-rights

he's trying to make women who are fighting for their rights sound abnormal or weird. sorry vance, that won't work - it's you that is the outlier with fringe views.

He is making this fatal mistake of continually insulting vast swaths of voters- childless women, post menopausal women, working women, people who love cats…. Has this friendless loser ever met a cat lover???

You do not F with people who love cats!!🐈‍⬛

How does anyone think this “trained lawyer” is going to debate a normal? He is so completely out of touch and living on another planet.

I agree with everything you said except that I think Vance will be a good debater. He said he doesn't mind being aggressive and he can't wait to attack Walz on his military experience. Vance is undignified and will enjoy hitting below the belt despite Walz being a thoroughly decent person who has a great service record. Vance has no shame.

I don't disagree, but I would add that Vance has this extremely bizarre tendency to insult the voting public, despite all his education and all his training... that's not going to go well in a debate no matter how good he is at attacking Walz.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

On top of the wannabe authoritarian’s other archaic views of women, the Ohio senator revealed to Fox News Wednesday that he doesn’t believe it’s “normal” for suburban women to care about their reproductive rights.

“What do you say to suburban women out there who are marinating in this propaganda?” prompted Fox News host Laura Ingraham, claiming that some women have fallen into the belief that abortion is banned nationally.

“Well, first of all, I don’t buy that, Laura,” Vance said. “I think most suburban women care about the normal things that most Americans care about.”

https://newrepublic.com/post/184896/jd-vance-claim-women-voters-rights

he's trying to make women who are fighting for their rights sound abnormal or weird. sorry vance, that won't work - it's you that is the outlier with fringe views.

He is making this fatal mistake of continually insulting vast swaths of voters- childless women, post menopausal women, working women, people who love cats…. Has this friendless loser ever met a cat lover???

You do not F with people who love cats!!🐈‍⬛

How does anyone think this “trained lawyer” is going to debate a normal? He is so completely out of touch and living on another planet.

I agree with everything you said except that I think Vance will be a good debater. He said he doesn't mind being aggressive and he can't wait to attack Walz on his military experience. Vance is undignified and will enjoy hitting below the belt despite Walz being a thoroughly decent person who has a great service record. Vance has no shame.

Vance is aggressive in an immensely unlikable way. He repulses everyone except other sociopaths.

[Anonymous]

He’s so oblivious. His mother in law took a sabbatical from her academic position to help with her grandchildren so that Usha could serve her federal court clerkship. She did it for her daughter’s career, not for his dumb misogynistic ass. What an ungrateful jackass.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

On top of the wannabe authoritarian’s other archaic views of women, the Ohio senator revealed to Fox News Wednesday that he doesn’t believe it’s “normal” for suburban women to care about their reproductive rights.

“What do you say to suburban women out there who are marinating in this propaganda?” prompted Fox News host Laura Ingraham, claiming that some women have fallen into the belief that abortion is banned nationally.

“Well, first of all, I don’t buy that, Laura,” Vance said. “I think most suburban women care about the normal things that most Americans care about.”

https://newrepublic.com/post/184896/jd-vance-claim-women-voters-rights

he's trying to make women who are fighting for their rights sound abnormal or weird. sorry vance, that won't work - it's you that is the outlier with fringe views.

He is making this fatal mistake of continually insulting vast swaths of voters- childless women, post menopausal women, working women, people who love cats…. Has this friendless loser ever met a cat lover???

You do not F with people who love cats!!🐈‍⬛

How does anyone think this “trained lawyer” is going to debate a normal? He is so completely out of touch and living on another planet.

I agree with everything you said except that I think Vance will be a good debater. He said he doesn't mind being aggressive and he can't wait to attack Walz on his military experience. Vance is undignified and will enjoy hitting below the belt despite Walz being a thoroughly decent person who has a great service record. Vance has no shame.

A high ranking army officer will be able to handle him.

A high ranking army officer who was both a high school teacher and a coach will be able to handle him.

[Anonymous]

Vance is intelligent and articulate. I can see why dems constantly disparage and lie about him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

On top of the wannabe authoritarian’s other archaic views of women, the Ohio senator revealed to Fox News Wednesday that he doesn’t believe it’s “normal” for suburban women to care about their reproductive rights.

“What do you say to suburban women out there who are marinating in this propaganda?” prompted Fox News host Laura Ingraham, claiming that some women have fallen into the belief that abortion is banned nationally.

“Well, first of all, I don’t buy that, Laura,” Vance said. “I think most suburban women care about the normal things that most Americans care about.”

https://newrepublic.com/post/184896/jd-vance-claim-women-voters-rights

he's trying to make women who are fighting for their rights sound abnormal or weird. sorry vance, that won't work - it's you that is the outlier with fringe views.

He is making this fatal mistake of continually insulting vast swaths of voters- childless women, post menopausal women, working women, people who love cats…. Has this friendless loser ever met a cat lover???

You do not F with people who love cats!!🐈‍⬛

How does anyone think this “trained lawyer” is going to debate a normal? He is so completely out of touch and living on another planet.

I agree with everything you said except that I think Vance will be a good debater. He said he doesn't mind being aggressive and he can't wait to attack Walz on his military experience. Vance is undignified and will enjoy hitting below the belt despite Walz being a thoroughly decent person who has a great service record. Vance has no shame.

A high ranking army officer will be able to handle him.

A high ranking army officer who was both a high school teacher and a coach will be able to handle him.

Waltz was enlisted and lies about his rank.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He’s so oblivious. His mother in law took a sabbatical from her academic position to help with her grandchildren so that Usha could serve her federal court clerkship. She did it for her daughter’s career, not for his dumb misogynistic ass. What an ungrateful jackass.

I wonder if she regrets it now, given her daughter’s lame choices on husband and career now. Hard to imagine how any self-respecting woman could vote for this misogynistic creep.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He’s so oblivious. His mother in law took a sabbatical from her academic position to help with her grandchildren so that Usha could serve her federal court clerkship. She did it for her daughter’s career, not for his dumb misogynistic ass. What an ungrateful jackass.

I wonder if she regrets it now, given her daughter’s lame choices on husband and career now. Hard to imagine how any self-respecting woman could vote for this misogynistic creep.

LOL she would be joining a very big club, wouldn’t she? His MIL despising him would be the most normal thing about JD Vance.