Vance’s Latest Misogynistic View

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's funny to me is his views are regularly espoused by posters here. Posters who are mad their kids don't want grandkids. Posters who are upset their parents don't want to spend all their time with their grandkids. Posters who insist people who aren't married by a certain age must have something wrong with them.
Posters who claim non parents are just immature second class citizens and they regularly denigrate family and friends without a spouse or kids. That mom should just deal with it because husbands aren't great with little kids and on and on.
I know you all are going to quote me and pretend this doesn't happen or it's just incel and maga trolls. Don't bother gaslighting.

He's saying the quiet part out loud, but it's not just the GOP who feel this way. There's a lot of misogyny in America.

Hey PP how do you know that the people you are citing are Democrats (which you are implying)? Those posts you are talking about are on the non-political forums and those posters are not identifying their party membership.

Also those posters are not advocating for policies anyway, are they? They are making their own personal observations and opinions about their own little worlds. Get back to us when they are pushing for new laws and policies that say "mom should just deal with it because husbands aren't great with little kids" (sounds like a Republican to me to be honest) and so forth.

Exactly! It's one thing to hope your AC have kids, but very different to think the govt should ban abortion. Personal preferences of DCUM posters are not being imposed on society at large by the hand of the state!

[Anonymous]

Dovetailing on vile views, will the devout “Catholic” JD Vance condemn his homosexual paymaster for slandering the Church on Joe Rogan this week?

[Anonymous]

Isn’t he just regurgitating the grandmother hypothesis which he probably learned from a humanities course?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Postmenopausal females" -- and they wonder why we call them weird. What a psychotic way to refer to older women.

Does he refer to his mother this way? Will he refer to his wife this way when she hits that stage? Weirdo.

He gives me incel vibes.

I doubt he refers to his mother that way. His mother was an abusive, drug-addicted, unstable woman. For that reason, his grandmother took over raising him when he was a teenager.

May be that's one of the trait which attracted him to Usha, an intelligent and responsible woman who was ideal mother material in every way and had stable parental role models.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Isn’t he just regurgitating the grandmother hypothesis which he probably learned from a humanities course?

No, because that’s the theory that those grandmothers are valuable in themselves with their knowledge as well as a pair of hands. JD - or, for the pedants among us, the podcaster with whom he was agreeing - was saying that those women’s sole value, since they’re no longer breeding, is to provide care for the newly bred.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How did he get accepted to Yale?

Branding fail for Yale

Yale's "brand" has been a failure for some time now. Especially after the entire world saw the YLS morons shouting down an invited speaker.

He came far considering hurdles he faced in life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn’t he just regurgitating the grandmother hypothesis which he probably learned from a humanities course?

No, because that’s the theory that those grandmothers are valuable in themselves with their knowledge as well as a pair of hands. JD - or, for the pedants among us, the podcaster with whom he was agreeing - was saying that those women’s sole value, since they’re no longer breeding, is to provide care for the newly bred.

So that women can have more children. It’s not a value judgment

[Anonymous]

I don't know if he is an involved dad or not but he probably knows value of a stable family environment for a growing child from his own experience.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn’t he just regurgitating the grandmother hypothesis which he probably learned from a humanities course?

No, because that’s the theory that those grandmothers are valuable in themselves with their knowledge as well as a pair of hands. JD - or, for the pedants among us, the podcaster with whom he was agreeing - was saying that those women’s sole value, since they’re no longer breeding, is to provide care for the newly bred.

or just a twisted way of saying that grandparents can play a significant role in lives of their grandchildren, like it takes a village to raise a child, not just a nuclear family?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Postmenopausal females" -- and they wonder why we call them weird. What a psychotic way to refer to older women.

Does he refer to his mother this way? Will he refer to his wife this way when she hits that stage? Weirdo.

He gives me incel vibes.

I doubt he refers to his mother that way. His mother was an abusive, drug-addicted, unstable woman. For that reason, his grandmother took over raising him when he was a teenager.

May be that's one of the trait which attracted him to Usha, an intelligent and responsible woman who was ideal mother material in every way and had stable parental role models.

Usha was likely literally the first girl that ever showed interest in him. And the set up was under the advisement of two gatekeeper professors who controlled clerkships she wanted and a book deal he sought. He is a creepy incel in a de facto arranged marriage.

[Anonymous]

Is it really any wonder why this creepy dweeb hates women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:America is suffering from an epidemic of fat, ugly, mean spirited misogynists and it makes me wish we had a hot war going. Men like Vance forget that significant proportions of men were typically wiped out in wars and cannon fodder was historically the main use of lower class men of peasant stock like him. This age in which the local idiot has the luxury of an internet connection and can sit around spewing hatred about women is no good.

+100

With all the hand wringing over the amount of male violence in the world, I'm not sure why people haven’t made the connection that the world hasn’t had a big war in more than a generation. Wars have historically taken care of the kind of men who now sit around ranting about how much they hate women.

Society has evolved to try to avoid war, which in the abstract is a good thing. But war is a natural part of life on earth and has always served a purpose, for better or worse.

When I was just a kid studying history and anthropology, I used to say that society would suffer the consequences of too many “useless” men. (I know it’s not kind to say, but it’s true). And we have.

Exactly. Wars also used up the violent, hateful men who drive crime rates. Being sent to the frontlines was a common punishment for criminals. Society has yet to come up with another mechanism that accounts for the fact that many (most?) men are not meant to reproduce and are not fit to be part of society beyond the point at which they reach adulthood.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ugly incels like him legitimately hate women because they never got laid in their teens and 20s. They never get over it. But most keep their dark commentary private or on incel forums, while Vance goes mask off publicly because he’s a white trash idiot hick at heart who became famous.

It's posts like yours that make it abundantly clear who has deep, deep issues. I hope you're in some kind of anger management therapy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ugly incels like him legitimately hate women because they never got laid in their teens and 20s. They never get over it. But most keep their dark commentary private or on incel forums, while Vance goes mask off publicly because he’s a white trash idiot hick at heart who became famous.

You jealous? His stock portfolio alone shows he’s got the brains to succeed.

Ah, the "man of the people" with the big bouncy stock portfolio. Better shout that even louder, that's bound to work.

Yes, calling him an "ugly incel white trash idiot hick" is a much smarter tactic. Thanks for showing us all your true colors.
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't know if he is an involved dad or not but he probably knows value of a stable family environment for a growing child from his own experience.

+1
Absolutely. He has talked about that before. My husband is the same way - came from a pretty unsavory upbringing and is so grateful for the stable family life our own kids have. Vance seems like a very good father.