Vance’s Latest Misogynistic View

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn’t he just regurgitating the grandmother hypothesis which he probably learned from a humanities course?

No, because that’s the theory that those grandmothers are valuable in themselves with their knowledge as well as a pair of hands. JD - or, for the pedants among us, the podcaster with whom he was agreeing - was saying that those women’s sole value, since they’re no longer breeding, is to provide care for the newly bred.

or just a twisted way of saying that grandparents can play a significant role in lives of their grandchildren, like it takes a village to raise a child, not just a nuclear family?

+100
Funny how "it takes a village" didn't cause this much outrage, yet it's basically saying the same thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Postmenopausal females" -- and they wonder why we call them weird. What a psychotic way to refer to older women.

Does he refer to his mother this way? Will he refer to his wife this way when she hits that stage? Weirdo.

He gives me incel vibes.

I doubt he refers to his mother that way. His mother was an abusive, drug-addicted, unstable woman. For that reason, his grandmother took over raising him when he was a teenager.

May be that's one of the trait which attracted him to Usha, an intelligent and responsible woman who was ideal mther material in every way and had stable parental role models.

Usha was likely literally the first girl that ever showed interest in him. And the set up was under the advisement of two gatekeeper professors who controlled clerkships she wanted and a book deal he sought. He is a creepy incel in a de facto arranged marriage.

DP. Tell us you're a nutcase without actually telling us. Good grief. They had all of their classes together in law school and met there. Any more weird lies you'd like to spread?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is it really any wonder why this creepy dweeb hates women.

Ah, the troll posts rando troll tweets. That tracks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn’t he just regurgitating the grandmother hypothesis which he probably learned from a humanities course?

No, because that’s the theory that those grandmothers are valuable in themselves with their knowledge as well as a pair of hands. JD - or, for the pedants among us, the podcaster with whom he was agreeing - was saying that those women’s sole value, since they’re no longer breeding, is to provide care for the newly bred.

or just a twisted way of saying that grandparents can play a significant role in lives of their grandchildren, like it takes a village to raise a child, not just a nuclear family?

+100
Funny how "it takes a village" didn't cause this much outrage, yet it's basically saying the same thing.

I don't remember it being a post menopausal female village.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn’t he just regurgitating the grandmother hypothesis which he probably learned from a humanities course?

No, because that’s the theory that those grandmothers are valuable in themselves with their knowledge as well as a pair of hands. JD - or, for the pedants among us, the podcaster with whom he was agreeing - was saying that those women’s sole value, since they’re no longer breeding, is to provide care for the newly bred.

or just a twisted way of saying that grandparents can play a significant role in lives of their grandchildren, like it takes a village to raise a child, not just a nuclear family?

+100
Funny how "it takes a village" didn't cause this much outrage, yet it's basically saying the same thing.

I don't remember it being a post menopausal female village.

Or any implication that caring for children is that age group's sole purpose.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn’t he just regurgitating the grandmother hypothesis which he probably learned from a humanities course?

No, because that’s the theory that those grandmothers are valuable in themselves with their knowledge as well as a pair of hands. JD - or, for the pedants among us, the podcaster with whom he was agreeing - was saying that those women’s sole value, since they’re no longer breeding, is to provide care for the newly bred.

or just a twisted way of saying that grandparents can play a significant role in lives of their grandchildren, like it takes a village to raise a child, not just a nuclear family?

+100
Funny how "it takes a village" didn't cause this much outrage, yet it's basically saying the same thing.

I don't remember it being a post menopausal female village.

Or any implication that caring for children is that age group's sole purpose.

Bingo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"Postmenopausal females" -- and they wonder why we call them weird. What a psychotic way to refer to older women.

The radio host said that, not Vance.

If you listen, Vance did not disparage his mil, he praised her. The "why didnt she keep working and help pay for childcare?" comment was to say that society puts more value on the $$.

This thread is really taking comments (not even said by Vance) out of context.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Postmenopausal females" -- and they wonder why we call them weird. What a psychotic way to refer to older women.

The radio host said that, not Vance.

If you listen, Vance did not disparage his mil, he praised her. The "why didnt she keep working and help pay for childcare?" comment was to say that society puts more value on the $$.

This thread is really taking comments (not even said by Vance) out of context.

If you want to have a career in politics and appeal to a wide range of people, I imagine one of the simplest things you can do is simply decline to be on a program where something so offensive will be expressed, and if you happen to be in that situation anyway, couch (hehe) your statements in such a way that it’s clear what you really mean.

And if you find yourself in a situation where you said something stupid anyway, despite your best efforts, you need to have a way to apologize or clarify without digging your hole deeper.

If a politician can’t manage this, they shouldn’t expect anyone to vote for them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Postmenopausal females" -- and they wonder why we call them weird. What a psychotic way to refer to older women.

The radio host said that, not Vance.

If you listen, Vance did not disparage his mil, he praised her. The "why didnt she keep working and help pay for childcare?" comment was to say that society puts more value on the $$.

This thread is really taking comments (not even said by Vance) out of context.

Uh, no, they were in context.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn’t he just regurgitating the grandmother hypothesis which he probably learned from a humanities course?

No, because that’s the theory that those grandmothers are valuable in themselves with their knowledge as well as a pair of hands. JD - or, for the pedants among us, the podcaster with whom he was agreeing - was saying that those women’s sole value, since they’re no longer breeding, is to provide care for the newly bred.

or just a twisted way of saying that grandparents can play a significant role in lives of their grandchildren, like it takes a village to raise a child, not just a nuclear family?

+100
Funny how "it takes a village" didn't cause this much outrage, yet it's basically saying the same thing.

No, it isn’t saying the same thing at all. Vance is expecting women in his life to sacrifice to serve his needs but he is not offering to help them or anyone. He’s just a taker, not a giver.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn’t he just regurgitating the grandmother hypothesis which he probably learned from a humanities course?

No, because that’s the theory that those grandmothers are valuable in themselves with their knowledge as well as a pair of hands. JD - or, for the pedants among us, the podcaster with whom he was agreeing - was saying that those women’s sole value, since they’re no longer breeding, is to provide care for the newly bred.

or just a twisted way of saying that grandparents can play a significant role in lives of their grandchildren, like it takes a village to raise a child, not just a nuclear family?

+100
Funny how "it takes a village" didn't cause this much outrage, yet it's basically saying the same thing.

Because it was the village and not specifically the “post-menopausal females” tasked with raising up the kids. That’s a huge difference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Postmenopausal females" -- and they wonder why we call them weird. What a psychotic way to refer to older women.

The radio host said that, not Vance.

If you listen, Vance did not disparage his mil, he praised her. The "why didnt she keep working and help pay for childcare?" comment was to say that society puts more value on the $$.

This thread is really taking comments (not even said by Vance) out of context.

It’s as if you’re on the verge of acknowledging that what Vance agreed with is offensive and very weird, but your tribalism prevents you from having the thought.

[Anonymous]

You know nothing about me or my "tribe".
I just listen carefully and form my own opinions.
You may convince yourself about what I and others think but you won't convince me.

[Anonymous]

Vance gunning for the misogynist incel cohort. This hick dunce has killed the ticket.

Note: Nick Fuentes actually can’t stand Vance and thinks he was an awful pick, so they’re a little off base there.

[Anonymous]

Vance thinks it’s so important for grandmothers to be caretakers for grandchildren that he moved 800 miles away from his mom and wrote a memoir smearing her as a junkie.