Only in elementary here and I agree with all of this. The demands feel unrelenting at time because there's just always something coming from school + homework + activities + neverending laundry, dishes etc. Feels like so much more than pre K years. I'm not really sure an only is easier at this age, because the only playmates at home are mom and dad. It's tough to get things done and keep the kid occupied. But I do think only was much easier in the younger years and will be again when they are older. |
I have very very minimal leisure time as a sahm to an elementary kid. Several hours a day to undo the mess, at least an hour or two of home management (handling renovations, repairs, condo trust, purchases for the home etc), and also meal planning and grocery, making appointments, planning and booking travel, planning and booking events and activities for the family, running errands like bank and drycleaners, replying to emails from everything school and home related. I'm honestly busier than when I was working full time from home with a kid in preK. I know most working moms are doing the same tasks. I used to do them during work hours. The admin of running a household takes up so much more time than you realize |
I think a lot of this is answered by saying they spent less on their house than some ppl and also have a good commute bc that was priority over schools. Plus 1 kids is less expensive than multiple. You don't have to be rich. Solo travel easier too - not as hard for a spouse to watch one kid Obviously ppl can make different decisions and yes more kids means less independence for the parents. |
PP here. To the DP who was annoyed by my response, I probably could have worded my initial statement better. "Parents *should have the opportunity to* have an enriching life aside from kids." There. THat is more what I meant. Yes, I think having less house was a big part of it. We make mid 200s and historically made much lower. Fortunate by normal people standards but not "rich" per DCUM! |
I have a senior in HS and once he goes to college, I'll get most of my life back. It helps if you are rich and can buy your teens a car. |
You have three kids and there are only two of you and you both work. What did you expect? Seriously. |
| If you have a full, enriching life outside of your kids, you are either a negligent parent or a rich one (or both). |
I am not that pp but also a SAHM who spends a lot of time planning for my kids’ educational and extracurricular activities. My kids are very well rounded. I have boys and a girl with a large age gap. Over the years, they have done soccer (rec and travel), cub scouts and Girl Scouts, swim team, tennnis, basketball, volleyball, baseball, pickleball, chess, coding, robotics, science Olympiad, piano, violin, band, guitar, nature classes, engineering, art, digital art, model UN, debate, you name it, my kids have probably done it. Some things they have only done for one seasons. Others for years. My two older kids compete in their sports at a high level. My kids are happy and healthy. They have a lot of friends. All 3 kids have solid friend groups and sign up for activities together and often become close to their teammates. |
We definitely know some parents who seem to put themselves first. I think parents with onlies can not lose themselves to their children since parents can tag team easier. When we only had one child, Dh and I had plenty of time to do what we did pre kids. Now we have 3 kids. Very little time to just relax. |
I'll take both for 200, Alex |
| All of it…until a year ago, when I found a sport I enjoyed outside of the house. We joined a club, and now my husband is in charge of the kids 3x a week and I play said sport for 2 hours. It has done wonders for me and my relationship with my whole family. Sure, I had friends I would text and do girls outings with occassionally, but having a set thing I do several times a week at a time that is not 4:30 AM on my Peloton has been life changing. |
+1 I think some of this is semantics, though. When I read "full, enriching life outside of kids," what that means to me is that you have other things in your life that are as rewarding and time consuming as parenting. That seems impossible, since parenting is both unbelievably time consuming (even with one kid, even with help, even with money) and I have found there are very few things in life as gratifying and rewarding on a profound level. Like yeah, I read books and have friends and have a couple hobbies, but do these things provide me with a deep sense of meaning and purpose the way parenting does? No. So yes, I'm on board with parents having an identity outside of their kids. For themselves and for their kids, actually -- I think it's good for kids to see their parents living rich lives and taking care of themselves and also to not always be the center of their parents' attention at all times. But the idea of a "full" life outside your kids, assuming your kids are under age 15 or so, seems like an extremely high bar that would necessarily mean neglecting parenting to some degree. I have a very good life and I think balanced life, but if my kid was suddenly missing from it, the sense of loss would be complete. Nothing I do matters as much to me. I know one day I will need to fill my life in a different way and I want to remember that, but for this season of life, my kid sits squarely on the front burner and that's where my focus is. |
What is the sport? Looking for ideas. |
"Full, enriching life" PP here -- yes, I think my phrasing has been misunderstood a bit. I, too, would be devastated if I didn't have my DC. I mostly meant "identity outside of kids", though perhaps I place relatively more weight on things like hobbies and free time and romantic time than others in this thread have described. |
It's not golf if it's only 2 hours. Lol |