Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:"There is no need for mixers and dances at co-ed public schools, because males and females interact daily with each other. Your experience at a public school is not what other are talking about. They are talking about private, all-girls/all-boys schools."
I think the point being made is that lots of schools, private and non-private, have cut back or completely eliminated discretionary social mixing. So the idea that a particular private school is doing what other schools are doing is not at all outlandish.
The OP says she is talking about NCS. The NCS is on a campus that has the brother school. Her daughter really never interacts with any of the boys? That's crazy. There is more going on here than OP is saying. Her daughter would have to be a complete recluse to avoid seeing and interacting with any boys while she is at school.
Pray tell us what op's dd is missing? St albans boys aren't all that and a bag of chips.
The OP says her kid is missing out on interactions with boys. Please read her posts.
I am pointing out that if the OP's daughter isn't interacting at all with boys at school, while she is on campus, then something is very weird. Literally the boys and girls schools are next door to each other and they
share sports/other facilities.
It's very easy not to have any interaction with the opposite school in 9th and 10th grade. The only sports that are coed are cross country/track and swimming. My daughter plays soccer,
basketball and softball. No interaction in any of those.
There is some interaction with the singing group and theatre but only a small fraction of the kids do those (mine does not).
There are some coed art classes but
my daughter's current art class has zero boys in it. There were 2 but they dropped it. My daughter had an art class last year with ONE boy in it. Now her art requirement is done.
There is a little more interaction later on through coed English classes senior year.
Mmm-hmm. Your daughter doesn't seem to be attracting boys, and she certainly doesn't seem to be making much effort to connect with them. She just happened to miss having boys in her art classes? Right. You pushed the sports way too hard. Now your daughter either doesn't know how to make herself attractive to boys, or has decided to be gay.
This is why you have to plot out DC's path from the beginning. No, it's not "cute" to have your kid play with another kid whose parents rent an apartment. No, it's not "sweet" that your kid shared her lunch with a FARMS kid. Yes, it's highly concerning and upsetting when your kid does not get interested in American Girl and doesn't "pretend" or "visualize" her American Girl's path.
I have always told my girlfriends that each kid should have a stylist from 5th grade onward. Someone highly qualified to help DC, girl or boy. The stylist can educate on fashion trends, make sure the haircut is attractive, and work through with DC the language that DC's appearance, clothes, and choice of friends tell about DC. Obviously Rachel Zoe would be ridiculously expensive, but she's the ideal. Perhaps you could see if Zoe has a protege or trainee or intern who would meet with DC at a reasonable rate to gain experience. Up to you.