
See, there you go again, shifting definitions and trying to squeeze a square peg into a circle hole. No one is gaslighting you. They are sharing their opinions and you don’t like it. |
I'm 100% with you. Referencing Graceland to DEFEND Swift's music is insane to me. Just off the top of my head, I can think of a dozen phrases of music from that album that are so instantly recognizable and evocative. And it was released nearly 40 years ago! Also don't discount the fact that Simon was doing something musically interesting with that album, incorporating African rhythms, instruments, and vocalizations with an American approach to songwriting and lyricism in a way no-one had ever heard before and that actually made the album controversial -- Simon has been accused of cultural appropriation many times for that album, though it's an open debate because Simon actually collaborated with and hired many African artists, including the Zulu choir Ladysmith Black Mumbazo (who toured and Simon and appeared with him on SNL in a pretty famous appearance). I still think you can argue the ethics of what Simon did but it's harder to argue with the results. Whether you credit Simon alone for the brilliance of Graceland or you view it as a successful product of cross-polinization of musical styles and techniques, the truth is that Graceland is a work of genius that stands the test of time. There is no equivalent Taylor Swift album and I think she is too careful and risk-averse as a business person to produce one. Simon went to Africa, because endlessly inspired by what he heard there, and made something controversial and new. George Harrison did something similar with his travels in Southeast Asia. Swift's musical moves tend to be carefully planned and attuned to the existing preferences of her current fan base, or to capture an additional corner of the market without offending her current fans. It's a recipe for mediocrity, not innovation. Which is why Folklore and evermore sound kind of like indie albums from lesser known bands, but not TOO much like them, and certainly don't do anything new or exciting musically. It was a good way for Swift to capture some casual fans of bands like the National and Vampire Weekend without pissing off her core fanbase, who are more middle-of-the-road pop fans. Paul Simon is not a saint nor my personal hero (I think he was kind of a jerk in his relationships and probably self-centered and arrogant), but he made a truly amazing album of music. Taylor Swift could be the perfect human being, but I can't say the same about her musical achievements. She's okay, nothing more, and that is by design. |
The irony is it was a Swift detractor that first made the Paul Simon comparison. |
I believe they reference Simon to draw a negative comparison. To say "here is an example of truly great lyricis" and then to compare Swift negatively, as an example of mediocre or bad lyrics. So, actually not ironic. Perhaps Swift should write a song called "dictionary" and sell a Taylor Swift branded dictionary in her tour merchanise? |
+ 1 million, there was just a comment about how the term “gaslighting” was being as misused as “ironic.” Why or why do people use words they don’t know? |
This is not a private conversarion where one person interrups your conversation. You put it on the internet. What did you expect? |
Oh no you called me HYPOCRITICAl. How will I go on? I was actually not talking to you the haters. Post all you want....and I will respond if I choose |
Okay, here’s a few examples that comes to mind immediately While you were out building other worlds, where was I? Where's that man who'd throw blankets over my barbed wire? I made you my temple, my mural, my sky Now I'm begging for footnotes in the story of your life Drawing hearts in the byline Always taking up too much space or time —— Spider-boy, king of thieves Weave your little webs of opacity My pennies made your crown Trick me once, trick me twice Don't you know that cash ain't the only price? It's coming back around And I keep my side of the street clean You wouldn't know what I mean — It rains when you’re here and it rains when you’re gone — You call me up again just to break me like a promise, so casually cruel in the name of being honest — Long were the nights when my days once revolved around you Counting my footsteps Praying the floor won’t fall through, again — Fighting with a true love is boxing with no gloves, chemistry 'til it blows up, 'til there's no us |
Good lord, calm down. I don’t really know much about Paul Simon or his music. I have heard an and enjoy a few of his songs. I’m not comparing them or saying swift is just as good or iconic or talented. I was just saying that that lyric reminds me of something Taylor Swift would write and pointing out that lyrics don’t have to be super complex to be impactful and beautiful. |
I expected nothing. But a conversation in a coffee shop isn't private either. Swift fans are in this thread saying they feel attacked. But... why? It would be very easy to read the title of the thread, conclude they disagree and don't want to read a bunch of criticism of Taylor Swift, and move on. I don't understand the persistent desire to come to a thread that is clearly created for the purpose of criticizing Swift, engage in argument, and then get mad when people continue to disagree. I'm not surprised that Swift fans are angered by this thread -- anyone who knows anything about the Swifties could predict this. But it doesn't make it reasonable or rational. |
I love "calm down" to a perfectly come and well-argued post. Of course you don't know much about Paul Simon or his music. This is entirely the point. The people who claim Taylor Swift is great often don't have a lot of exposure to other music. I remember when she released her albums that sound kind of "indie-ish" a lot of the Swift fans I know were like "this is your kind of music!" But it's not. It's a weak imitation. I'm sorry. She's not an innovator. I come back to the thread title: her music isn't very good. It's not. I wish it was! If someone as famous and popular as Taylor Swift was churning out album after album of truly great music, I'd be thrilled because I love music. But she's not. Like many prolific pop stars before her, she's cranking out mediocrity in great volume because it sells. Yay? This is why I can't celebrate her and bristle at people saying she's so talented. Hardworking? No question. Smart and canny about her business? Yes and yes. But talented? Middling at best. I guess she's a good example of what a middling talent can accomplish with grit, determination, and a lot of financial backing. |
I don’t see what you see. To me all of those lyrics are derivative. I can immediately recall the other specific lyrics they remind me of. It’s not plagiarism per se, but they are reductive, nothing new or interesting to me, and I prefer the original much better. I would go line by line and describe what’s derivative about all of them, but the last time I did, I was accused of being a gaslighting abuser. But if you’re interested, I suggest you look into U2’s music. So many of Taylor’s lines are “inspired” directly by Bono. |
Really? There is no difference between a private conversation in a coffee shop and opening up a discussion on the internet? I highly doubt anyone would interject if they over heard you trash talking Taylor Swift in a coffee shop. And the ones who are mad are not the defenders. It is the op and those who hate her and her music. That's why it was started, right? |
You don’t make any sense at all. You can’t write coherently. Go ahead and respond away, whenever you feel like it. Your word salad adds nothing to this discussion, but you go, girl! |
hmmm what an insult...I am so hurt boo hoo ![]() |