
The PP's comment ("You can. 100%. It’s just sad as hell and a little pathetic, but you absolutely can.") is an abusive technique. Not saying that PP is an abuser, at all. But this is a common rhetorical tool that is abusive, where you mask insults and ad hominem ("sad as hell" and "pathetic") under a veneer of not caring at all, or being detached and reasonable. The PP actually cares deeply about the subject or they wouldn't be posting. But rather than saying "this is important to me and here are the reasons why I think you are wrong," she is pretending not to care at all but then tossing very rude and hurtful comments in as facts. People who do this instinctually, even in a silly conversation about Taylor Swift, should be aware it's an abusive tactic. If you want to engage with people on an issue, do so directly and respectfully. Pretending not to care one way or another while issuing low-blow attacks is not the way. |
Nobody’s posts are asinine. They are expressing different opinions. And yours are opinions, too, not the facts you think they are. And for you to think name calling is appropriate, especially in this context, is really sad actually. I’m going to leave the thread because, while it was entertaining initially, now I just feel sorry for you. I pity you. Someone hurt you and I feel bad for you. |
The term "parasocial" was invented in the 1950s but recently became more popularized specifically because of the relationships that celebrities have developed with their fans via social media. People are talking about it more today because these relationships are far more common than they used to be, and social media interaction seems to intensify parasocial relationships more than ever before. Previously people developed parasocial relationships by going to concerts or fan events, reading interviews or biographies, etc. Now you log onto Instagram or TikTok and not only see these celebrities at home, in their down time, with friends and family, but sometimes you can interact with them directly via comments and likes. Swift has harnessed and encouraged these parasocial relationships to an extreme degree, to great effect (and $$$$$ for her). So of course it's going to come up in a conversation about her. Saying you can't say "parasocial" in a conversation about Taylor Swift is like telling people not to mention the word autofiction in discussing Truman Capote's In Cold Blood. Even if you don't use the term, it will be part of the conversation because it's a perfect example of it. But if you want to turn it into a drinking game, that could be fun. |
Save your pompous, self aggrandizing comment for yourself. Many posts are asinine. Sorry if some responses hurt your feelings. |
I got a very different read about the poster that you are illogically certain someone hurt. For me, she sounds highly educated, cultured and intelligent, not wounded. |
No. |
You know what is also an abusive technique? Gaslighting. So quit telling people they are wrong for being a fan of someone. |
That poster is angry at ... everyone who doesn't agree with her. Can you imagine meeting *that* in person? Holy crap. |
Where has anyone said you are "wrong" for being a fan of someone? The point is just that some of us are not fans. If you are looking for somewhere where your Taylor Swift fandom will be rewarded and celebrated, a quick Google search revealed the following: https://www.reddit.com/r/TaylorSwift/ https://newtaylorconnect.freeforums.net/forum https://taylor.boards.net There is no shortage of Taylor Swift echo chambers out there. Go forth! Enjoy! |
Gaslighting? I don’t think you understand what that term means. It means manipulating someone into questioning his or her sanity. It does not mean telling someone that their preference for a celebrity is wrong. That being said, no one in this thread has told anyone that they are wrong for being a fan. The only thing posters are doing on a thread titled “Taylor Swift is awful (and her music isn’t very good),” is discussing the reasons they think she’s a mediocre singer, lyricist and performer. Voicing their opinions on her abilities is not gaslighting. |
The difference is this: Person A: "DD just got a new Mary Johnson record for christmas. I'm psyched - I love MJ!" Person B: "Really? I am not a fan. A few of my friends tried to get me into her but I don't get it." Person A: "Oh man. LOVE her. So who are your faves?" And the conversation goes on for a few minutes ending music discussions at some point and veering into something else. Vs: Person A: "DD just got a new Mary Johnson record for christmas. I'm psyched - I love MJ!" Person B: "Really? I'm not a fan. She is ugly, and her eggs are drying up. She can't write or sing. You are going to be embarrassed for liking her in 10 years." Person A: "Hahahah.....oh wow look at the time...." leaves unhinged conversation |
Exactly, there’s no shortage of places to praise Taylor on the internet. This unprecedented and persistent attempt to quiet any adverse opinion on a pop star is making me think that some of these posters are actually lowly interns for Taylor’s PR team. |
They absolutely have. I can point you about 100 comments on this thread of people saying they’re going to regret being a fan, they’re wrong, and have no musical taste,. You telling me that is not the case is completely manipulating reality which is the very definition of gaslighting. you’re also super condescending. I know what the definition of gaslighting is. |
Well, last I checked this is a discussion board. People are expressing opinions. Some aren't yours. Suck it. |
I personally think the personal attacks on Swift's looks or personal choices are lame and I've defended Swift on this thread against that, even though I don't like her at all as a musician or performer. But even with that, your example doesn't hold up because (1) this is not a casual conversation between two friends with a pre-existing relationship -- it's a thread about not liking Taylor Swift. So it's more like a group of people who all don't like Taylor Swift got together at a coffee shop and were talking about not liking Taylor Swift, and then "Person B" who is a Taylor Swift megafan, overheard them and comes and sits down at their table and tries to engage them in conversation about Taylor Swift, and then gets angry at them when they reiterate that they don't like her and actually came to this gathering for the express purpose of discussing how they don't like her. And then, (2) not only refused to leave but told all the people who had made the plans to get together to discuss not liking Taylor Swift that THEY should leave, or at least sit there in silence, because their opinions on Taylor Swift, that they just wanted to share with each other, were hurting Person B's feelings. I know a ton of people who love Taylor Swift and I never say anything more to them about her than "oh yeah, she's not my thing." Or sometimes I'll say something nice that I genuinely think, like "I've heard her show is really impressive and the costumes look awesome" or "she's a really savvy businesswoman -- I admire her for that." But at the end of the day, I do NOT like her music and don't get why other people do like it so much. It's just a total mystery to me why or how she sells so many albums and inspires such devotion. And I've tried. I've listened to many of her albums all the way through. I even have some artists I am a fan of who have done covers of her songs and I can't get into those either. I just don't like her. And that doesn't make me a jerk or stupid or pathetic or whatever. It just means I don't like Taylor Swift. To quote your very favorite musical artist, you need to calm down. |