Help me understand Republican women in their 30s and 40s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not going to convince any right wing republicans of anything, so I am just waiting for them to fool around and find out. Not sure they are going to like what's coming for them too, if a republican actually gets elected this time.

Candidly, as a Democrat I was assured that the entire country would fail if Trump became president and that objectively did not happen.

We did have a pandemic. And nationwide race riots. I dunno about you, but I didn't enjoy all that.

Tell us how Trump caused a global pandemic that originated from China.

Cause? No. Made exponentially worse because of his completely inept response? Hell yes.

Funny how none of the blindly partisan Democrats in this thread have been willing to say with any specifics how Hilary Clinton was going to stop the spread of the virus in China, India, or the rest of the world.

I am still looking forward to learning about those plans! 👍 It’s amazing how Hilary apparently had the ability to stop a global pandemic. Can’t wait to hear how!

Leadership
Expertise
Coordination
Delegation
Decisiveness
Management
Oversight
Logistics
Communication

In other words, the exact opposite of what Trump spent his time on in 2020.

Specifics. How specifically was Hilary going to stop the spread of Covid in countries outside the US and stop a global pandemic? That’s the claim you Democrats are making. I want the exact plan that would have halted the spread of the virus. You say it exists. So share it.

The early detection office in China that Trump closed and the pandemic playbook that was developed by W and Obama that Trump threw out. Not stealing medical equipment. Taking it seriously. Paying attention during briefings.

Delusional. Just delusional. It’s honestly astonishing how scientifically illiterate you are.

But that’s not actually a specific or scientific response. You just don’t like the facts.

I’m sorry that you don’t understand how powerful the United States is or the good it can accomplish for Americans. Sure there is waste and inefficiency but the actual positives the federal government achieve are tremendous. You should be proud of that and not seek to tear it down.

+1
Republicans are nihilistic morons that don’t understand what the government even does.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The southern Baptists are deciding this week whether people can use ivf.

Republican women: what say you?

Hunter Biden something something, border woofwoofblahblah, trans men at swim meets - the usual.

Hunter Biden is irrelevant but the destruction of Title IX and males being allowed into vulnerable women-only spaces are absolutely serious issues that shouldn't be dismissed.

I live in flyover country and no one I know is talking about this or worrying about it. Trans people aren't any more violent then the rest of us.

I go to a welcoming church so have met several trans gender people. They are lovely. Kind. Helpful. Not aggressive.

You are a beast to try to say they are all bad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The southern Baptists are deciding this week whether people can use ivf.

Republican women: what say you?

Hunter Biden something something, border woofwoofblahblah, trans men at swim meets - the usual.

Hunter Biden is irrelevant but the destruction of Title IX and males being allowed into vulnerable women-only spaces are absolutely serious issues that shouldn't be dismissed.

I live in flyover country and no one I know is talking about this or worrying about it. Trans people aren't any more violent then the rest of us.

I go to a welcoming church so have met several trans gender people. They are lovely. Kind. Helpful. Not aggressive.

You are a beast to try to say they are all bad.

It is unlikely these posters are at all concerned about trans people. It's just a GOP strategy to try to combat the GOP hemorrhaging young females voters since they blew up roe. It's a failing strategy but it seems to be all they can come up with.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The southern Baptists are deciding this week whether people can use ivf.

Republican women: what say you?

Hunter Biden something something, border woofwoofblahblah, trans men at swim meets - the usual.

Hunter Biden is irrelevant but the destruction of Title IX and males being allowed into vulnerable women-only spaces are absolutely serious issues that shouldn't be dismissed.

I live in flyover country and no one I know is talking about this or worrying about it. Trans people aren't any more violent then the rest of us.

I go to a welcoming church so have met several trans gender people. They are lovely. Kind. Helpful. Not aggressive.

You are a beast to try to say they are all bad.

It is unlikely these posters are at all concerned about trans people. It's just a GOP strategy to try to combat the GOP hemorrhaging young females voters since they blew up roe. It's a failing strategy but it seems to be all they can come up with.

Exactly. To the extent any of them are concerned, it’s because they think trans people are icky and it should be okay to mock them. They’re not afraid of getting assaulted. They just don’t like being told their attitude is nasty.

[Anonymous]

In general, single women are overwhelmingly democrats and married women are 50/50ish. It's odd that none of this discussion has centered on why married women may have voting preferences that align with male voting patterns, except the bizarre and misogynistic conclusion that women are brainless and will do as their husbands instruct.

Married women tend to have more in common with men because marriage causes them to be a unit and their interests are united. A married woman has no interest in males being discriminated against, etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In general, single women are overwhelmingly democrats and married women are 50/50ish. It's odd that none of this discussion has centered on why married women may have voting preferences that align with male voting patterns, except the bizarre and misogynistic conclusion that women are brainless and will do as their husbands instruct.

Married women tend to have more in common with men because marriage causes them to be a unit and their interests are united. A married woman has no interest in males being discriminated against, etc.

I think that children influence the picture as well. Becoming a parent coincided with a hard right turn in my political opinions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The southern Baptists are deciding this week whether people can use ivf.

Republican women: what say you?

Hunter Biden something something, border woofwoofblahblah, trans men at swim meets - the usual.

Hunter Biden is irrelevant but the destruction of Title IX and males being allowed into vulnerable women-only spaces are absolutely serious issues that shouldn't be dismissed.

I live in flyover country and no one I know is talking about this or worrying about it. Trans people aren't any more violent then the rest of us.

I go to a welcoming church so have met several trans gender people. They are lovely. Kind. Helpful. Not aggressive.

You are a beast to try to say they are all bad.

Agreed. Transgendered ppl are the least of this country’s worries. But it’s interesting some make it seem that way

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The southern Baptists are deciding this week whether people can use ivf.

Republican women: what say you?

Hunter Biden something something, border woofwoofblahblah, trans men at swim meets - the usual.

Hunter Biden is irrelevant but the destruction of Title IX and males being allowed into vulnerable women-only spaces are absolutely serious issues that shouldn't be dismissed.

I live in flyover country and no one I know is talking about this or worrying about it. Trans people aren't any more violent then the rest of us.

I go to a welcoming church so have met several trans gender people. They are lovely. Kind. Helpful. Not aggressive.

You are a beast to try to say they are all bad.

It is unlikely these posters are at all concerned about trans people. It's just a GOP strategy to try to combat the GOP hemorrhaging young females voters since they blew up roe. It's a failing strategy but it seems to be all they can come up with.

Exactly. To the extent any of them are concerned, it’s because they think trans people are icky and it should be okay to mock them. They’re not afraid of getting assaulted. They just don’t like being told their attitude is nasty.

I don’t really care about trans people as much as I care about truth and reality. Transwomen are men and pretending otherwise harms women and children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The southern Baptists are deciding this week whether people can use ivf.

Republican women: what say you?

Hunter Biden something something, border woofwoofblahblah, trans men at swim meets - the usual.

Hunter Biden is irrelevant but the destruction of Title IX and males being allowed into vulnerable women-only spaces are absolutely serious issues that shouldn't be dismissed.

I live in flyover country and no one I know is talking about this or worrying about it. Trans people aren't any more violent then the rest of us.

I go to a welcoming church so have met several trans gender people. They are lovely. Kind. Helpful. Not aggressive.

You are a beast to try to say they are all bad.

Trans women are exactly as violent as cis men.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The southern Baptists are deciding this week whether people can use ivf.

Republican women: what say you?

Hunter Biden something something, border woofwoofblahblah, trans men at swim meets - the usual.

Hunter Biden is irrelevant but the destruction of Title IX and males being allowed into vulnerable women-only spaces are absolutely serious issues that shouldn't be dismissed.

I live in flyover country and no one I know is talking about this or worrying about it. Trans people aren't any more violent then the rest of us.

I go to a welcoming church so have met several trans gender people. They are lovely. Kind. Helpful. Not aggressive.

You are a beast to try to say they are all bad.

It is unlikely these posters are at all concerned about trans people. It's just a GOP strategy to try to combat the GOP hemorrhaging young females voters since they blew up roe. It's a failing strategy but it seems to be all they can come up with.

Exactly. To the extent any of them are concerned, it’s because they think trans people are icky and it should be okay to mock them. They’re not afraid of getting assaulted. They just don’t like being told their attitude is nasty.

I don’t really care about trans people as much as I care about truth and reality. Transwomen are men and pretending otherwise harms women and children.

Relax. That is so far down on the danger list as to be almost non-existent. Your time would be better spent on teaching your kid to be a safe driver.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In general, single women are overwhelmingly democrats and married women are 50/50ish. It's odd that none of this discussion has centered on why married women may have voting preferences that align with male voting patterns, except the bizarre and misogynistic conclusion that women are brainless and will do as their husbands instruct.

Married women tend to have more in common with men because marriage causes them to be a unit and their interests are united. A married woman has no interest in males being discriminated against, etc.

My white husband has not faced discrimination once in his life, and he’ll be the first to tell you that. I’m not a political unit with my husband, I’m an individual. We’re both Dems, though I’m further left. And finally, I haven’t aligned myself to men because I fell in love with him and got married.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The southern Baptists are deciding this week whether people can use ivf.

Republican women: what say you?

Hunter Biden something something, border woofwoofblahblah, trans men at swim meets - the usual.

Hunter Biden is irrelevant but the destruction of Title IX and males being allowed into vulnerable women-only spaces are absolutely serious issues that shouldn't be dismissed.

I live in flyover country and no one I know is talking about this or worrying about it. Trans people aren't any more violent then the rest of us.

I go to a welcoming church so have met several trans gender people. They are lovely. Kind. Helpful. Not aggressive.

You are a beast to try to say they are all bad.

It is unlikely these posters are at all concerned about trans people. It's just a GOP strategy to try to combat the GOP hemorrhaging young females voters since they blew up roe. It's a failing strategy but it seems to be all they can come up with.

Exactly. To the extent any of them are concerned, it’s because they think trans people are icky and it should be okay to mock them. They’re not afraid of getting assaulted. They just don’t like being told their attitude is nasty.

I don’t really care about trans people as much as I care about truth and reality. Transwomen are men and pretending otherwise harms women and children.

Relax. That is so far down on the danger list as to be almost non-existent. Your time would be better spent on teaching your kid to be a safe driver.

Obviously you aren’t a parent, so I’m not sure why you are on a parent site.

If you were then you know every other teenage girl thinks she is a boys these days.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not going to convince any right wing republicans of anything, so I am just waiting for them to fool around and find out. Not sure they are going to like what's coming for them too, if a republican actually gets elected this time.

Candidly, as a Democrat I was assured that the entire country would fail if Trump became president and that objectively did not happen.

We did have a pandemic. And nationwide race riots. I dunno about you, but I didn't enjoy all that.

Tell us how Trump caused a global pandemic that originated from China.

Cause? No. Made exponentially worse because of his completely inept response? Hell yes.

Funny how none of the blindly partisan Democrats in this thread have been willing to say with any specifics how Hilary Clinton was going to stop the spread of the virus in China, India, or the rest of the world.

I am still looking forward to learning about those plans! 👍 It’s amazing how Hilary apparently had the ability to stop a global pandemic. Can’t wait to hear how!

Leadership
Expertise
Coordination
Delegation
Decisiveness
Management
Oversight
Logistics
Communication

In other words, the exact opposite of what Trump spent his time on in 2020.

Specifics. How specifically was Hilary going to stop the spread of Covid in countries outside the US and stop a global pandemic? That’s the claim you Democrats are making. I want the exact plan that would have halted the spread of the virus. You say it exists. So share it.

NP: Given that the GOP doesn't even have a platform, you may want to start fixing up your own house first before you start pointing fingers.

Democrats in this thread have said that Hilary would have stopped the Covid-19 pandemic globally. They are the ones who made that claim. Are you now backing down from that claim?

That is an absolutely hilarious claim; would love to hear more about it. Of course, Obama was going to stop the oceans from rising and reverse climate change, so it's quite likely that their worshipping cult members do believe this.

Yes, it is hilarious. And they seem to be digging in. Comedy gold. What a cult.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The southern Baptists are deciding this week whether people can use ivf.

Republican women: what say you?

Hunter Biden something something, border woofwoofblahblah, trans men at swim meets - the usual.

Hunter Biden is irrelevant but the destruction of Title IX and males being allowed into vulnerable women-only spaces are absolutely serious issues that shouldn't be dismissed.

I live in flyover country and no one I know is talking about this or worrying about it. Trans people aren't any more violent then the rest of us.

I go to a welcoming church so have met several trans gender people. They are lovely. Kind. Helpful. Not aggressive.

You are a beast to try to say they are all bad.

Trans women are exactly as violent as cis men.

Exactly. Male patterns of violence are completely distinct and dramatically higher than violence committed by females.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not going to convince any right wing republicans of anything, so I am just waiting for them to fool around and find out. Not sure they are going to like what's coming for them too, if a republican actually gets elected this time.

Candidly, as a Democrat I was assured that the entire country would fail if Trump became president and that objectively did not happen.

We did have a pandemic. And nationwide race riots. I dunno about you, but I didn't enjoy all that.

Tell us how Trump caused a global pandemic that originated from China.

Cause? No. Made exponentially worse because of his completely inept response? Hell yes.

Funny how none of the blindly partisan Democrats in this thread have been willing to say with any specifics how Hilary Clinton was going to stop the spread of the virus in China, India, or the rest of the world.

I am still looking forward to learning about those plans! 👍 It’s amazing how Hilary apparently had the ability to stop a global pandemic. Can’t wait to hear how!

Leadership
Expertise
Coordination
Delegation
Decisiveness
Management
Oversight
Logistics
Communication

In other words, the exact opposite of what Trump spent his time on in 2020.

Specifics. How specifically was Hilary going to stop the spread of Covid in countries outside the US and stop a global pandemic? That’s the claim you Democrats are making. I want the exact plan that would have halted the spread of the virus. You say it exists. So share it.

The early detection office in China that Trump closed and the pandemic playbook that was developed by W and Obama that Trump threw out. Not stealing medical equipment. Taking it seriously. Paying attention during briefings.

Delusional. Just delusional. It’s honestly astonishing how scientifically illiterate you are.

But that’s not actually a specific or scientific response. You just don’t like the facts.

I’m sorry that you don’t understand how powerful the United States is or the good it can accomplish for Americans. Sure there is waste and inefficiency but the actual positives the federal government achieve are tremendous. You should be proud of that and not seek to tear it down.

How was Hilary going to stop the spread of Covid internationally? Your cult can’t answer that question, even though you claimed that she would have stopped the spread of Covid worldwide.