RBG Politcal Discussion

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:10:06 again.

In the current environment, Schumer, Pelosi, and Biden have no choice but to expand SCOTUS to 11 or 13 judges and nuke the filibuster should the Senate fall into Dem hands.

They do have a choice. They can move back towards a non-politicized SCOTUS, undoing the damage that RBG did in this regard. Undo the Ginsberg Rule.

McConnell is about to further politicize the court right now. He can choose not to.

LOL, no. Republicans finally realized that they need to play the game that Democrats started. We helped you vote in Obama, you then turned around and called us racists for 8 years.

Not again.

Uh, who were the birthers, and the people who objected to tan suits and white house gardens and sleeveless dresses? Don't talk to us about the racists, when McConnell put roadblocks up from the drop of the first hat.

Oh, you are right, that's so much worse than calling someone racist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lagoa seems a little less scary than Barrett?

Yes, though conservative no indication at this point she's a religious zealot. She'd be easier to confirm in a very contentious environment and could potentially help in FL. She'd be a smart pick, though with Trump who knows. He'll probably pick whichever one sucks up to him the most.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:10:06 again.

In the current environment, Schumer, Pelosi, and Biden have no choice but to expand SCOTUS to 11 or 13 judges and nuke the filibuster should the Senate fall into Dem hands.

They do have a choice. They can move back towards a non-politicized SCOTUS, undoing the damage that RBG did in this regard. Undo the Ginsberg Rule.

McConnell is about to further politicize the court right now. He can choose not to.

LOL, no. Republicans finally realized that they need to play the game that Democrats started. We helped you vote in Obama, you then turned around and called us racists for 8 years.

Not again.

Uh, who were the birthers, and the people who objected to tan suits and white house gardens and sleeveless dresses? Don't talk to us about the racists, when McConnell put roadblocks up from the drop of the first hat.

Oh, you are right, that's so much worse than calling someone racist.

Wut? Being a racist is better than calling someone a racist? What the hell is wrong with you people?

[Anonymous]

Lindsay bringing straight fire on the upcoming scotus confirmation.

Says Lindsay to the democrats who tried to destroy Brett kavanaugh “you reap what you sow”.

https://mobile.twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1307807076358422531%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fpolitics%2Fprotesters-gather-outside-lindsey-grahams-home-supreme-court-building

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lindsay bringing straight fire on the upcoming scotus confirmation.

Says Lindsay to the democrats who tried to destroy Brett kavanaugh “you reap what you sow”.

https://mobile.twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1307807076358422531%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fpolitics%2Fprotesters-gather-outside-lindsey-grahams-home-supreme-court-building

Lindsey is on tape saying he wouldn’t confirm a Trump pick in Trump’s last year AFTER what happened to Kavanaugh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lindsay bringing straight fire on the upcoming scotus confirmation.

Says Lindsay to the democrats who tried to destroy Brett kavanaugh “you reap what you sow”.

https://mobile.twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1307807076358422531%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fpolitics%2Fprotesters-gather-outside-lindsey-grahams-home-supreme-court-building

We can look forward to sexual assault allegations against Garland? Huh?

This is absurd. Graham is trash. The false equivalencies are exhausting.

[Anonymous]

Some of you people talk is if politicians never flipped-flopped their positions before. Wake up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Some of you people talk is if politicians never flipped-flopped their positions before. Wake up.

Well, he "brought fire" when he held the opposite position too. His "fire" means zero now.

[Anonymous]

Republicans can't vote on a COVID relief bill, but they sure can find the time to confirm another Supreme Court justice.

[Anonymous]

Joe Scarborough has an interesting take--says this is an absolute nightmare for Trump. That it will increase turnout by women and suburbanites who will vote Dem, and that it severely hurts Collins and Gardner no matter how they vote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lindsay bringing straight fire on the upcoming scotus confirmation.

Says Lindsay to the democrats who tried to destroy Brett kavanaugh “you reap what you sow”.

https://mobile.twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1307807076358422531%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fpolitics%2Fprotesters-gather-outside-lindsey-grahams-home-supreme-court-building

We can look forward to sexual assault allegations against Garland? Huh?

This is absurd. Graham is trash. The false equivalencies are exhausting.

Graham’s take is ridiculous. Note that Kavanaugh was given the treatment he was given because he was accused of sexual assault and then cried about how unfair he was being treated while in what was essentially a job interview. Gorsuch did not get the same “treatment” so it was clearly targeting an actually unqualified nominee.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Joe Scarborough has an interesting take--says this is an absolute nightmare for Trump. That it will increase turnout by women and suburbanites who will vote Dem, and that it severely hurts Collins and Gardner no matter how they vote.

A girl can dream.

Vote them all out forever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Some of you people talk is if politicians never flipped-flopped their positions before. Wake up.

McConnell doesn't flip flop. If he can't get his way, he sabotages everything until he does.

[Anonymous]

Some of you are confusing a process disagreement with a policy disagreement. Processes should be neutral. If you want to change them whenever they disadvantage you, it's because you wan't force your own policy. Likewise, if you abuse the process to your own advantage, you are doing it for policy reasons, and the process is no longer neutral.

[Anonymous]

Lindsey is just doing what he does best, twisting himself in knots like a tumbler. Ignore.