
They could have directly asked what McKnight knew about complaints against Biedleman when she promoted him. She would have said she couldn't answer and it would be clear she knew and is complicit in protecting him. |
MCPS leadership is so spineless and pathetic. No way they will do a single thing to stop abusers and predators. What a disgrace that not a single member of the County Council was willing to go after McKnight. These people truly make me sick. |
This has become a soap opera. I seriously wonder about McKnight’s competency |
Just look at the crap PD she is shoving into teachers. We have actual PD that we have to do on our own time in addition to the daily work of our jobs yet she demands a PD day be used for this?
https://youtu.be/lKjXipZjLj4?si=OWcKZ07n1a_ldQzQ How about giving me the freedom to do my job?!! |
So what's the alternative? That McKnight is such a feckless and ineffective leader that her team would shuffle around and give a promotion to a major target of the internal investigation without ever letting her know? Is that supposed to make her look better? |
Thank you Alexandra and Nicole! Please keep the pressure on! |
Really? I think if they had asked her that it would be clear she wasn't involved so please stop with the wild speculation and try to focus on the actual facts. Sure, I get your rabid about finding fault with MCPS but this is getting a bit crazy. |
This is different than a former employee saying she did know. Again, it's just speculation and doesn't prove anything. Maybe sells papers. |
I love how the rabid pro mcps poster is keeping this thread alive...lol |
I hope the rapid pro-MCPS poster is getting paid over time for this PR work on an anonymous message board. Although the posts are doing more harm than good, since seeing sycophants feel compelled to toe the party line like this and deliberately and repeatedly deny facts and evidence, tells you a whole lot about the kind organizational culture that’s festering within MCPS… |
The level of stupid and incompetent within MCPS administration and leadership is baffling. After getting their a**es handed to them by WaPo, the county council and the county exec, you’d think they would start to be a bit more calculating and careful with their moves. No one in leadership thought or could foresee how promoting Khalid Walker at this moment could present a PR and perception problem as he is a central figure of a serious personnel and HR scandal? |
Truly moronic and makes me question McKnight's capabilities even more. I mean, the General Counsel is literally directly under her and I'm baffled that she thought it would look okay to give this guy a promotion and movement into the General Counsel! And why the heck did the actual General Counsel think it was okay too? Are they that clueless?? Of all departments, they should have a huge awareness on how this would look to the public. OMG. |
She had the opportunity to answer that way but didn’t. Instead, asked an open-ended question about whether she knew of the investigations, she said she didn’t know he was under investigation at that time. That’s a narrow lawyerly answer, not transparency. |
This. Does she have any values? How can she think this was the right move? Is she just a figure head and someone else is calling the shots? |
Clearly the general counsel should be relieved of her duties because she promoted someone under investigation. That’s if the superintendent didn’t know. And if she didn’t know, why is she always out of loop on promotions of people under investigation. |